Checkup Q about test (enanth vs. blend)

[kethnaab]

Lemme make sure I'm following properly.

500mg of test is 500mg of test. However, various esters will release the test slower (or faster), and that is what will cause your blood levels to fluctuate.

people recommend longer esters (cyp/enanth) over blends (sus/omna) because the longer esters allow for a gradual buildup of test followed by a period of steady-state, which minimizes sides.

A blend, assuming once (or even twice) weekly injections, will cause a test level that fluctuates more due to the 2 short-lived esters in each.

The basic question I have is...

Assuming EOD or 3x-weekly injections of the blend, then are the following statements true:

1) Shorter-acting esters in the blend will provide a slightly noticeable "bump" earlier in the cycle than what would be experienced with a longer-acting ester
2) The frequent blend injections will keep test levels very stable, day-to-day
3) The maximum amount of test in the system from this method will be slightly lower or equal to what would be experienced on a cycle of a longer ester, assuming the same total mg amount overall (i.e. 500mg weekly of sus vs. 500mg of enanth), which would lead to lesser sides

 

[needtogetaas]

brillant

 

[kethnaab]

"brilliant", as in that means I was correct in my assumptions?

or "brilliant", as in that means I need to wear my helmet and ride the short bus to school?

 

[flyingjer]

yeah are right, but i think it is somewhat common knowledge that sus eod is the best due to the prop and phenylprop esters

 

[asianlover]

"brilliant", as in that means I was correct in my assumptions?

or "brilliant", as in that means I need to wear my helmet and ride the short bus to school?

now thats funny shit. i have never used a sigle long ester. only blends and short esters. i used sust up to 700mg/wk and had almost no sides. no even any acne.

 

[big_boy_1]

1) Shorter-acting esters in the blend will provide a slightly noticeable "bump" earlier in the cycle than what would be experienced with a longer-acting ester
2) The frequent blend injections will keep test levels very stable, day-to-day
3) The maximum amount of test in the system from this method will be slightly lower or equal to what would be experienced on a cycle of a longer ester, assuming the same total mg amount overall (i.e. 500mg weekly of sus vs. 500mg of enanth), which would lead to lesser sides

1. Yes.

2. Not completely true, some bbers require daily injections of sustanon to keep stable levels, eod is not as stable.

3. No, because sustanon is less effective -unless injected daily- youll require more to make the same gains as enanthate.

 

[flex2win]

Correct me if I'm wrong, BUT:
500mg of oil based test is NOT truly 500mg of Test, it's around 380mg, assuming you have 76mg/ml of actual test without the ester.
Only Test suspension would equal the desired 500mg amount you're talking about.

 

[flyingjer]

Correct me if I'm wrong, BUT:
500mg of oil based test is NOT truly 500mg of Test, it's around 380mg, assuming you have 76mg/ml of actual test without the ester.
Only Test suspension would equal the desired 500mg amount you're talking about.

yes this true, prop has the lightest weight, so 500mg of prop a week is more than 500mg of enant a week, with sust, i don't feel like going through the math right now, but i am sure that levels are not as high as taking enanthate equally, i have done this on a PCT calculater, doing the same amount of prop mg per week, ed injects does not get your test levels as high as the same amount of mg's as enanthate, BUT!!!
it might make up the difference since prop's ester is lighter in weight, maybe tomorrow not at 4:30A.M. i will figure out the math, not now though, going to bed