I am reading Rick Collins "Legal Muscle", an informative, entertaining and very useful read on every topic pertaining to AAS and the law. I recommend it for everyone in this forum who chooses to use AAS, who is interested in using AAS or who knows someone who uses AAS.
Basically if your doctor prescribes AAS to you for a valid medical purpose, that's legal. That generally means AAS can be prescribed for hormone replacement and for gender-change operations because those are considered valid medical porposes.
Building muscle is not currently considered a "valid medical use". However, Rick asks us to consider this: surgery to implant fake muscles IS considered a valid medical operation, as is full-body liposuction, even both are purely aesthetic and arguably more dangerous a precedure than using AAS to build real muscle and lose real fat! It is quite a hypocracy that AAS are illegal for purely aesthetic reasons when more dubious and more dangerous choices are still legal and available.
Why is it that a doctor can inject a deadly botulin toxin (botox) into your face to make your face look nice, but the same doctor cannot inject a safe compound that has been well-understood for 100 years (say 250mg of testosterone) into your body to make your body look nice? It's a crazy mixed-up world. Go figure.
We all need to speak up to our various lawmakers, the people who create and maintain these crazy, poorly thought-out laws.