BRITISH SAS vs. DELTA FORCE

[~HOUNDOG~]

What do you think? I go with the SAS. They are trained more intensivley, have more experience and are some tough sums a bitches. Delta Force have had too many failures, overly confident and have "after action counsellors ie, "pussied down."

 

[DcupSheepNipples]

What do you think? I go with the SAS. They are trained more intensivley, have more experience and are some tough sums a bitches. Delta Force have had too many failures, overly confident and have "after action counsellors ie, "pussied down."

Neither! The Gurkhas!

 

[Golfer18--old]

They should cross train.

 

[~HOUNDOG~]

What is a ghurka? If I recall they were world war 2 clandestine troops?

 

[Mad4Iron]

Read Col Beckwith's book.

He trained with the SAS and Delta was based on it.

Go on about the failures,I'd like to hear it.

Mad

 

[Imnotdutch]

Neither! The Gurkhas!

The Gurkhas are good........but they are a world away from the SAS. I still wouldnt fuck with a single one of them though.

 

[The Ranger]

Everyone knows of the failures....Tell me of the victory's.

Ranger

 

[manny78]

SAS is far superior. More experience and better trained. Take a look at all the conflicts they got involved.

 

[DcupSheepNipples]

The Gurkhas are good........but they are a world away from the SAS. I still wouldnt fuck with a single one of them though.

I'm talking one on one not the whole units themselves! The SAS have DF can cheat the Gurkhas with their technology gadgets! Take a Gurkhas with the same equipment, then I would take the Gurkhas as a whole!

 

[Imnotdutch]

In that case I agree..............

I'm talking one on one not the whole units themselves! The SAS have DF can cheat the Gurkhas with their technology gadgets! Take a Gurkhas with the same equipment, then I would take the Gurkhas as a whole!