BRITISH SAS vs. DELTA FORCE

[~HOUNDOG~]

What do you think? I go with the SAS. They are trained more intensivley, have more experience and are some tough sums a bitches. Delta Force have had too many failures, overly confident and have "after action counsellors ie, "pussied down."

 

[DcupSheepNipples]

What do you think? I go with the SAS. They are trained more intensivley, have more experience and are some tough sums a bitches. Delta Force have had too many failures, overly confident and have "after action counsellors ie, "pussied down."

Neither! The Gurkhas!

 

[Golfer18--old]

They should cross train.

 

[~HOUNDOG~]

What is a ghurka? If I recall they were world war 2 clandestine troops?

 

[Mad4Iron]

Read Col Beckwith's book.

He trained with the SAS and Delta was based on it.

Go on about the failures,I'd like to hear it.

Mad

 

[Imnotdutch]

Neither! The Gurkhas!

The Gurkhas are good........but they are a world away from the SAS. I still wouldnt fuck with a single one of them though.

 

[The Ranger]

Everyone knows of the failures....Tell me of the victory's.

Ranger

 

[manny78]

SAS is far superior. More experience and better trained. Take a look at all the conflicts they got involved.

 

[DcupSheepNipples]

The Gurkhas are good........but they are a world away from the SAS. I still wouldnt fuck with a single one of them though.

I'm talking one on one not the whole units themselves! The SAS have DF can cheat the Gurkhas with their technology gadgets! Take a Gurkhas with the same equipment, then I would take the Gurkhas as a whole!

 

[Imnotdutch]

In that case I agree..............

I'm talking one on one not the whole units themselves! The SAS have DF can cheat the Gurkhas with their technology gadgets! Take a Gurkhas with the same equipment, then I would take the Gurkhas as a whole!

 

[BigBazooka]

Pretty soon, KAYNE says that both are pussies and he'd take both of them blindfolded and one arm tied behind his back.

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

They do cross train. I trained with Delta Force a few times when I was in Ranger Regiment. Ranger Regiment has more incommon with SAS than Delta Force does.

Delta Force is much smaller and has different missions....also, Delta Force has been handicaped by military leadership that did not know how to use Special ops and preferred heavy armor. That is changing somewhat, and special ops troops are getting better.

 

[MrMuscle]

Well only thing i know is that the SAS gets their ass handed to them at a regular bases when it comes to the yearly NATO exercises. Last time i was on the exercise the norwegian special forces the Telemark Bataljon beat them in every encounter they had. It WAS a winter exercise, and that might have a lot to do with it.

 

[Imnotdutch]

It WAS a winter exercise, and that might have a lot to do with it.

Well worked out genius.............try em in the jungle or the desert and see how you fair then.

If you are brought up living in snow you are bound to be better at dealing with it than those that aren't. As for the SAS getting their asses handed to them regularly that isn't strictly true is it......slight exaggeration there huh. At least thats what my friends in the forces seem to think........

 

[Imnotdutch]

Thats not to mention that the main point of the SAS is to avoid confrontations and collect information. Their approach in confrontations is shoot and scoot........that way you live to fight another day and you are still operational.

 

[MrMuscle]

Hey i can only tell you what the war judges told us.

Oh and they got heavy penalized(sp?) for killing a couple of hundreds medics, among others me

 

[Imnotdutch]

Hey i can only tell you what the war judges told us.

Oh and they got heavy penalized(sp?) for killing a couple of hundreds medics, among others me

Something tells me they were having a laugh at your expense