Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Bill O'Reilly is officially insane...

2Thick

2Thick

Elite Mentor
Platinum
EF Logger
He has totally lost it.

We have always known that he is biased and incoherent, but it seems that his recessive CRACKHEAD gene has somehow become dominant.

http://www.outcastradio.com/streams/glick.mp3

Here is the audio of him interviewing a man who lost his father in the 9/11 attacks.

The best parts where he went totally ape-shit have been cut out.
 
Blind faith in government will be the downfall of freedom in a society.

bwood,

I question O'Reilly's reaction to historical FACTS. His arguments rested on the irrelevant work he supposedly has done for the family's of 9/11

Darktooth,

He was talking about Bush senior. The people that attacked the US were armed, trained and funded by the US government. That is why he is questioning the bombing of the innocent people of Afghanistan to get rid of the tiny minority of Taliban fighters.

I do not expect you to understand Glick when O'Reilly is screaming "SHUT UP" like a little brat everytime Glick recites a fact.
 
Bill O'Reilly Kicks ass and takes names. I would say anyone who doesn't like the O' Reilly fator then you voted for Clinton.
 
Darktooth said:
Glick blames Bush for his father's death? That's a little irrational, isn't it?
O'Reilly is a strong right-winger, and I could see why he would be so upset at Glick, since it seemed Glick would rather side with Afghanistan/Terrorists than with the American Govt.

atleast that's what I got out of it. I could be wrong.
Click to expand...

tooth...

glick is trying to blame past governmental actions
for 911...

he wants to blame bush sr. as he was the head of
the cia during a time when the us was training some
muslims who allegedly formed/participated in the taliban...

to a nutty liberal, the fact that this was done to help
them resist the USSR is irrelevant...

but 100,000??? seems like an unlikely number...

has the usa messed around too much with other
countries??? hell yes, get us out of the un...but then,
liberals wont have that will they???

but lets examine this liberal doublethink further...

the us messed with japan to an awful degree,
so we should have ignored pearl harbor???

according to libthink yes...of course, this concept
of appeasement worked well at munich...:rolleyes:

what really infuriated oreilly imho is that a man's son
is so polluted with spastic libthink that he cannot even
conceive of retaliation against the persons who physically
murdered his own father...

he wants to blame a causal chain, that if it truly exists,
is at least 20 years old...

this equates to blaming a shopping mall, that sold a
steak knife 20 years ago, that wound up in the hands
of felon who killed a loved one, for the murder...

in tort law this equates to cause in fact, true; but no
proximate cause...

i can see the libs side...but it doesnt matter...we must
fix it where these bastards dont do it again...yes, we can
do that, if we quit listening to whiny liberals...
 
bwood8168 said:
he wants to blame a causal chain, that if it truly exists,
is at least 20 years old...

this equates to blaming a shopping mall, that sold a
steak knife 20 years ago, that wound up in the hands
of felon who killed a loved one, for the murder...
Click to expand...

Now that is a stretch.

If the US had not brought the Taliban to power in the first place, they would not have had the power to allow Al Qaeda to train there.

That is a huge leap from selling something that was intended for a kitchen and then used in an unforeseen manner.

And 100k is a reasonable number.
 
That guys an idiot. He's real one sided, and I notice that his opinion is the ONLY opinion, and is the right opinion. Anyone elses opinion is not right, unless it shares his view.

This was hilarious..He copped out with the "out of respect for your father" thing, lol, what a puss.
 
true it is a stretch, but i was just illustrating,
albeit crudely, my logic...

but truthfully 2Thick, was the us just
supposed to stand by during the soviet
incursion???

i think yes, but let the media flash some
images of atrocities and what are the odds
that the bleeding hearts will let that happen???

hindsight being 20-20, it really is not fair to
be too critical to past foreign policy in this area...

but that is immaterial, it cant be changed...

what can be changed is these people's
capacity to do this again...take away their money...
lock down our effin borders inspite of all the liberal
whining...and kick the shit out of any nations openly
sponsoring terrorism...
 
OK, now you have proven your ignorance and glaring liberalism. Glick is a fucking idiot, his own father was killed by terrorists and he is so deluded that he was against the war on afghanistan because of the "poor afghani people"-which are allot better off now by their own admission by the way and now he is against the Iraq war because the US supported them during the Iran war. What a total doucebag. I would punch that punk in the face if I saw him. He is a disgrace and if he hates America so much he can go join his beloved Taliban and GET THE FUCK OUT!

All of you pansy liberals are so clueless as to what is going on in the real world. You assume O'Reilly is republican which he is not. Pro war does not = republican Bush supporter. This anti-war talk is far from honest dissent, it is anti-American propoganda that you liberals are spilling whenever you get the chance.

Are you really so blind? Blind faith in government will be the downfall? Do you honestly think the government is within the common citizens grasp or has been for oh about 30 years? What do you suggest we do? Sit on our ass and wait for our buildings and malls to blow up and say "oh , well its our own fault, oh well."

What has happened in the past makes no differance now, nor does anything Bush senior did, this is now and we have radical muslims breathing down our neck just itching to kill us- yes you liberals too!

That fool Glick should be ashamed that he supports the anti-war effort, his dad is rolling in his grave I am sure. Its funny how all of you who say you dont like O'Reilly just so happen to be liberals. Hmmm...
If you have a logical argument and facts to back it up he does not bully you. If you dont answer his questions like most of the liberal guest do, then he gets pissed. I dont blame him one bit. How in the hell can you not be mad as all hell that your own God damn father was killed by these scum? It is beyond me.

I wish to remind all of you who think like Glick that it is the military and soldiers who have died fighting under our United States flag so that pissant wussies like yourselves can even have the right to say the insane anti-American things you do. I dont like the government much either but this is a time to understand what needs to be done and what needs to be done is kick Iraq's ass!

If you come on the Factor spouting jibberish then Bill will treat you like the child you are, if you are professional and have a logical argument he will listen and respect you regardless of his differance in opinion.
 
excellent BRC!!!

however, i try to keep from personally
insulting 2Thick as he usually
returns the favor inspite of the
fact we seem to disagree a lot...

i am not sure he is really a liberal...

its 50/50 if he just likes stirring up poo...:)
 
BigRedCat said:
If you come on the Factor spouting jibberish then Bill will treat you like the child you are, if you are professional and have a logical argument he will listen and respect you regardless of his differance in opinion.
Click to expand...

The only one I hard on this audio clip acting like a child was O'reilly himself. He showed professionalism in the beginning, then he rapidly deteriorated into shit. He gets way too defensive it seems. It's one of those shows where if you agree with him, life is fine, if not, then he turns into a baby and boo hoo's himself a hole.
 
He was pissed because here is this kid that had his own father killed and he is basically defending the "poor terrorists"- its pathetic.
 
O'reily is a dick head. He should have stayed where he belongs covering the pulp of rags like Star and the Enquirer.
 
O'Reilly haters are all liberals. Coincidence?

Even after the undeniable evidence presented today the far left still clings to their insane anti-war philosophies. If that isn't politics over reason I dont know what is.

I like 2Thick, I find him to be one of the more intelligent people around here but I wish he would step outside his conspiratorial anti-government thinking for a moment and think what is best for the US and all other first world nations.

As for Bill O'Reilly covering the Star and the Enquirer- I will assume you have not read his bio. http://billoreilly.com/pg/jsp/general/billbio.jsp

By the way, since Colin Powell showed the world the evidence on Iraq today, 70% of the US favors a pre-emtive strike. Hell, even Diane Feinstein realized a strike is the best option. The rest of you holdouts can hate on the US while the military saves your ass from terrorism.
 
I'm a moderate, O'reilly is a dick head.

This war, like the previous gulf war, is about oil. Just call a spade a spade is all I say.
 
WODIN said:
I'm a moderate, O'reilly is a dick head.

This war, like the previous gulf war, is about oil. Just call a spade a spade is all I say.
Click to expand...

wodin...

i like oreilly because at his level it is
so rare to see any of the talking heads
display any emotion other than pity...

our society has devolved to the point
where any show of contempt for another's
viewpoint is considered bad...

i disagree...i want duels on the whitehouse
lawn...i want knifefights every time the congressional
idiots want to spend one of my dollars...

j/k, but damn i am sick of this used car salesman
schtick that has permeated all things political...
 
Bwood, I understand your point. I'm all for scrapping the entire electorial process and going to a fuedal system with battles to the death for senat and congressional seats.

1. It would far more entertaining.
2. The pay-per-view proceeds would fund government and we could abolish taxes.
 
Some O'Reilly quotes from that 4 minute conversation.

"I really don't care what you think."

"That's a bunch of crap."

"I've done more for [the 9/11] families than you could ever hope to do."

"You keep your mouth SHUT!"

"THEY KILLED YOUR FATHER!"

"HE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

"Shut up. Shut up!"

"Cut his mic."

BigRedCat said:
O'Reilly haters are all liberals. Coincidence?
Click to expand...

O'Reilly is a fucking moron - try to call me, of all people, a liberal.

Glick is wrong in his assumptions to blame Bush for his father's death, etc... but O'Reilly is just plain stupid for treating someone like that on his show. The fact that the "good parts" were cut out only reinforces my belief that he must have made a total ass of himself.

Again - try to call me, of all people, a liberal.

-Warik
 
WODIN said:
Bwood, I understand your point. I'm all for scrapping the entire electorial process and going to a fuedal system with battles to the death for senat and congressional seats.

1. It would far more entertaining.
2. The pay-per-view proceeds would fund government and we could abolish taxes.
Click to expand...

That's surprisingly lucid......lol

Moderate here too. O'Reilly is a classless buffoon....
 
BigRedCat said:
O'Reilly haters are all liberals. Coincidence?

Even after the undeniable evidence presented today the far left still clings to their insane anti-war philosophies. If that isn't politics over reason I dont know what is.

I like 2Thick, I find him to be one of the more intelligent people around here but I wish he would step outside his conspiratorial anti-government thinking for a moment and think what is best for the US and all other first world nations.

As for Bill O'Reilly covering the Star and the Enquirer- I will assume you have not read his bio. http://billoreilly.com/pg/jsp/general/billbio.jsp

By the way, since Colin Powell showed the world the evidence on Iraq today, 70% of the US favors a pre-emtive strike. Hell, even Diane Feinstein realized a strike is the best option. The rest of you holdouts can hate on the US while the military saves your ass from terrorism.
Click to expand...

Exactly - I can't improve on this statement
 
Blind distrust of government will play a part as well.
2Thick said:
That's not what the founding fathers said, or have you forgotten so easily?
Click to expand...
Are you kidding? Show me one instance where they endorsed blind distrust of government. These men established government. They were the government. True, they gave many warnings regarding the peril of blind faith in government - but they never advocated it's dismissal.
 
O'Reilly is a televised version of Rush Limbaugh and that is all he will ever be. He is in no way a real journalist. I want to hear/read the news and make up my own mind, I don't need someone else to tell me what to think. The whole idea that Fox news is an objective news organization is laughable.
 
well i think he was just telling glick to shut up so he wouldnt embarrass himself anymore, he, its just undescribable
 
That guy on there was a total douche. I cant believe Oreilly didnt get any more pissed off at him then he did. I would have choked the shit out of him on t.v.
 
You know I'm going to skip through most of the posts...I watched this interview and the Guy was A DAMN FUCKING MORON!!!!

I hope someone else who lost a loved one puts this PIECE OF SHIT in his PLACE!!!!!!!!!!!

DAMN FUCKING,PUSSY,ASS FUCKING COCK LICKING PIECE OF SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!FUCK HIM. LEGACY...How's this for Legacy pieces of shit like him are the SCUM that BLAME AND DO NOTHING TO Solve the problem other then BITCH. HISTORY IS FILLED AND FORGOTTEN PEOPLE LIKE HIM

ARRRHHH!!!!!!!!!THAT piece of shit dont know DICK about AFGHANISTAN. HIS RHETORIC about that historical moment in time shows how little he knows about what happened then and now. I know DAMN well based on faimly accounts who were involved in AFGHANISTAN. What a bunch of Crap, We didn't start Training the "Mujahadean"sp? till shit had already hit the fan.




ARRRRRRRRRRHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!I'm out time to hit the gym and FOCUS hopefully on a growing possibility that I'll get to go Rid the world of Pieces of shit who FUCK with this Country and NOW THE FUCKING COMMIES of North Korea...

FUCK the Terrorists, the Commies, and those who support them.
 
....and people say that the military alters the thinking process :p








j/k bro we are proud of you (at least I am) like any of those who serve
 
Have you all forgotten who brought to light where all of the 9/11 Red Cross money (as well as lots of other charity money) was going to? It was O'Reilly.

That's what he meant by saying that he did more for those families than.....

how quickly you all forget what disproves your statements.

Glick is just another in a HUGE line of crybaby liberals, using a horrible tragedy to further their causes/beliefs.
 
hes a fool, his attacks on hiphop were unfounded and floored, when hiphop heads tried to discuss hiphop and his points with him he kept on going on about hoodlims and gangstas and the classic "i've been to africa and the uk so i known what gos on in the ghetto"
 
2Thick said:


Now that is a stretch.

If the US had not brought the Taliban to power in the first place, they would not have had the power to allow Al Qaeda to train there.
Click to expand...

I am still amazed with this argument. While we did aid this group in their efforts to resist Russian invasion, I fail to see how this prevents us from retaliating against this group when they turn against us. Are we somehow restrained from action because at one point in time we were involved with their country?

If you raise a dog and it turns against you or your family, do you keep it?
 
HulkRow said:
hes a fool, his attacks on hiphop were unfounded and floored, when hiphop heads tried to discuss hiphop and his points with him he kept on going on about hoodlims and gangstas and the classic "i've been to africa and the uk so i known what gos on in the ghetto"
Click to expand...

Are there really alternative options, concerning hiphop, asides from laughter and ridicule?
 
atlantabiolab said:


Are there really alternative options, concerning hiphop, asides from laughter and ridicule?
Click to expand...
hey for un-intelligent and ignorant people what else thats all they can do? for bill oreilly all he can do is talk loud but say nothing.
 
Please, like hip hop is "good" for kids. I love hip-hop and I can even see that it is essentially a bad influence on kids. How can you argue it isn't? Gangsta rap sells and what they are saying is far from positive. Dont get me wrong, I love the music but you have to at least see its damaging effect. At first it was a breakthrough for artists to be able to tell the stories of what it is like growing up in the "hood", now it is mostly studio gangsta's trying to sell albums.

I assume your talking about the Ludacris issue that O'Reilly addressed. He is basically responsible for Pepsi dropping Ludacris and since then Russel Simmons is crusading around trying to get blacks to boycot Pepsi because they have Ozzy in a commercial. Simmons says Ozzy is just as much a bad influence as Ludacris which is in my opinion, Ludacris! Perhaps 15 years ago he may have been but for Christ's sake, the Osbournes are a household name, far from dangerous- unless swearing is a terrible influence. Its funny watching these guys try to defend Ludacris and his "talent" to O'Reilly. Plus you have to take into consideration that O'Reilly is an older white guy who is definately not going to find any value in hip hop because of his age and upbringing. I value what hip-hop has to say but I still think all the bling bling and shoot em up lyrics are not at all good for kids. We have several generations of black and white(mostly white now) kids who try to be their rap hero's. All it gets them is in jail or dead. It is not a positive lifestyle. That is all O'Reilly is saying and I agree. I can see why Pepsi dropper Ludacris. He should not be selling a product to kids.

Hey babydoc, thanks for pointing that out about the red cross money- apparently many people do not know that is what O'Reilly was speaking about. He definately did do more than that punk ass ever will to help 9/11 victims.

For those of you that say you want to watch the news and decide on your own, HELLO!!, the Factor is a news editorial program, not the "news"- DUH! Watch the robots on the regular news if all you want is the story.
 
Don't watch him, but alot of what all of these talk/radio persons due is pure theatrics! Plain and simple. They elicit emotional responses from their audiences and then run with it. And most all who watch regulary are like the children and the Pied Piper.

One point that was brought out here is that it is irrelevent what happened in the past. We have now and have to deal with it. No amount of balming and finger pointing will save our asses now.

When we are secure again, then we should look at the past and learn from it, not pass blame or judgement.

Remember, hindsight is always 20/20!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Push50
A Brief History of Steroids
Replies
11
Views
2K
ballin2504
ballin2504
~Vision~
Tren/Injection cough explained (Backed by a clinical studies)
Replies
4
Views
3K
MasonicBodybuilder
MasonicBodybuilder
F
Blood work/pct
Replies
1
Views
818
SF1025
S
ceo
NCAAF - TEXAS BOWL - Syracuse v Minnesota - 12/27 - 6:00 PM ET
Replies
1
Views
2K
jesse_01
jesse_01
hanselthecaretaker
What would you make of this (Israeli agent predicted several terrorist attacks)?
Replies
2
Views
1K
jeremyng25
jeremyng25
Top Bottom