T
The Shadow
Guest
Comments on CLK430 and SLK500.
alien amp pharm said:The only way those cars could be prettier is if you could see my reflection in them.
NJjuice22 said:you gotta get the 05's , 06's if you getting a benz. those pics you posted are of played out older models.
The Shadow said:You obviously have no clue what a new sl costs.
NJjuice22 said:oh I do. I figured if you wanted those cars you could afford to go new. if not those are hella-nice used cars.
_Yossarian_ said:Ive owned neither but driven both. the CLK's handling seemed a bit tighter than what I had experienced in the sl500, but i was drunk at the time so it might have been justy an illusion.
Overall though, the slk500 is just so goddamn pretty that I dont see any other option.
The Shadow said:Im trying to locate an slk in silver as well
The Shadow said:Comments on CLK430 and SLK500.
MattTheSkywalker said:You already know how I feel, sir. I can buy anything and I avoid the german cars enthusiastically. Lexus SC430 is better if you want a 2dr or a coupe. I have one and I love it. I've driven many Benzes and find them to handle well, to be tight, and to be about 12% more comfy than BWs, which means they are like bringing a seat cushion to a football game, instead of just getting the stadium seat.
Silver on silver is about as ugly as ugly gets, avoid that at all costs. They'll probably be 5-10% cheaper because it is such an undesirable color. Those styles of MB on those years are fucking hideous, so boxy on the SL. The CLK is a little better but those tail lights are simly gross..
Last thing I'll add is that if you're looking at 2001s, you're taking on maintenance risks - remember total cost of ownership. Better off with something 2004-new, even if you can't get your pretty little hood ornament. Get an Acura or Lexus or something from 03 04 - now.
The girlies will still like you.
_Yossarian_ said:lol, whats up with you and lexus? they might be well engineered, its a shame they are so f*cking ugly. park a lexus next to a toyota camry and you cant tell the difference, lol.
The boxy style of that slk500, in my mind, is one of the most beautiful body designs Ive ever seen.
Youre right about silver though- black with saddle interior is the way to go.
tiger88 said:ya they are out of youre league
MattTheSkywalker said:I have the SC and the RX, so there aren't really comparable toyotas
MattTheSkywalker said:Point is, if he has to buy a car that's 5 years old to get one he can afford, buy something else.
Spend that extra cash on some good tacos.
The Shadow said:wow.....it's a bit pretentious for you to assume anything about me, you ass Nozzle.....
I think dropping 90 grand on ANY car is the definition of absurd....especialy knowing that you take a 20% hit the minute you drive it from the dealership.
MattTheSkywalker said:Last thing I'll add is that if you're looking at 2001s, you're taking on maintenance risks - remember total cost of ownership. Better off with something 2004-new, even if you can't get your pretty little hood ornament. Get an Acura or Lexus or something from 03 04 - now.
The girlies will still like you.
MattTheSkywalker said:hey man, I don't care how you spend your cash, you know this. It's just a general statement.
New cars are a scam, so is getting a payment on a car that's 5 years old. By the time you pay off the loan it'll be 10 years old, so you'll get to experience the severe depreciation that comes with old old cars, and still be making a payment.
Your move.
The Shadow said:I think dropping 90 grand on ANY car is the definition of absurd....especialy knowing that you take a 20% hit the minute you drive it from the dealership.
MattTheSkywalker said:not sure what you meant by not seeing it from the driver's seat.
The Shadow said:LMAO
Matt Matt Matt....again - you are making the assumption that I NEED a loan to purchse either car.
I believe that's Checkmate.
I know it can be difficult for you...but really - stop making an ass of yourself.
Mr. dB said:Can you tell what the exterior styling of a car looks like when you're sitting in it?
MattTheSkywalker said:I was writing shit for general consumption until you wanted to make it an exchange, so fuck it, I'll be unabashedly direct:
99.9999% of the time, people who want a "status" car but only look at older ones are doing it because they want the brand, not the best value. They want to own the hood ornament, not make a smart purchase. They only way they can afford the hood ornanment is to get an older model.
Maybe you're that 1 in a million exception.
Look at me, I have a Benz.
99.9999% of people who buy new upmarket cars don't sweat the depreciation that much. (Those who do, lease. They are called poseurs). Those who pay $100K+ for a new car do it because the price is secondary to the car.
You've already demonstrated a price / depreciation sensitivity that is uncharacteristic of a $100K car buyer. Maybe, yet again, you are the 1 in a million buyer. But I don't think so. I think your ultimate guiding principle is price, and you feel silly admitting that you're overpaying just to feel good about owning something.
Is that better? Do you like direct better? Do us both a favor and don't assume I ever give a shit what you do.
MattTheSkywalker said:you must own stock in Daimler Corp.
wutangnomo said:Now this is starting to turn into a great thread.
MattTheSkywalker said:I was writing shit for general consumption until you wanted to make it an exchange, so fuck it, I'll be unabashedly direct:
99.9999% of the time, people who want a "status" car but only look at older ones are doing it because they want the brand, not the best value. They want to own the hood ornament, not make a smart purchase. They only way they can afford the hood ornanment is to get an older model.
Maybe you're that 1 in a million exception.
Look at me, I have a Benz.
99.9999% of people who buy new upmarket cars don't sweat the depreciation that much. (Those who do, lease. They are called poseurs). Those who pay $100K+ for a new car do it because the price is secondary to the car.
You've already demonstrated a price / depreciation sensitivity that is uncharacteristic of a $100K car buyer. Maybe, yet again, you are the 1 in a million buyer. But I don't think so. I think your ultimate guiding principle is price, and you feel silly admitting that you're overpaying just to feel good about owning something.
Is that better? Do you like direct better? Do us both a favor and don't assume I ever give a shit what you do.
The Shadow said:Comments on CLK430 and SLK500.
bullett said:Shadow,
Search for a CLK55 AMG, or CL55 AMG (if you need four doors), 2000-2002 (W208 body style for the CLK).
You will love this car. 350hp, and handles like a dream....
Yopu can find 2002 CLK55 AMG's out there with less than 25k miles, and factory warranty left, as well as being eligible for the factory 100k warranty extension. You will find the pricing to be between 30-40k, for what was originally a 75k car. The sheer driving pleasure is awesome, not to mention the looks, and gasps in the parking lots...
Do yourself a favor and find one and drive it.........
Remember.........AMG
The Shadow said:Comments on CLK430 and SLK500.
manny78 said:I dont like the old SL500s. That CLK430 is not that bad but maintenance is a pain in the ass. If you cant find an old AMG it doesnt really matter because yoyu could tune that one to AMG specs or even better, Brabus. I guess you really like Benz, perosnally I wouldnt pay for an old Benz since there're so many options out there (Lexus, infiniti, BMW, Acura...).
LMAO..................true dat!!XBiker said:Get the extended warranty with the benz, you'll need it.
alien amp pharm said:Be a man, like me, and buy a truck. It'll get you laid!
ok so it won't get ME laid, but it'll get YOU laid.
The Shadow said:The new Jeep will turn 0-60 in under 5 seconds......
manny78 said:That's the SRT-8 and to be honest, this truck is just a poseur/wannabe Cayenne TT toy. it doesnt have the same off-road capabilities as the other Grand Cherokee. Dont buy that crap. Btw I saw a some nice used Benz at the local dealer today, among them was a C32 AMG 2004 with 15 000 miles on it for just $45k. That's one nice piece of ass with full warranty. I'm sure you can find the same.
manny78 said:I dont like the old SL500s. That CLK430 is not that bad but maintenance is a pain in the ass. If you cant find an old AMG it doesnt really matter because yoyu could tune that one to AMG specs or even better, Brabus. I guess you really like Benz, perosnally I wouldnt pay for an old Benz since there're so many options out there (Lexus, infiniti, BMW, Acura...).
The Shadow said:both cars have the 100k deal...so I dont think it would be much of an issue.
I like the look of the 2002 amg....performance-wise, the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times are comparable to the sl......6.1 0-60 for the amg versus 6.2 for the amg.
I also ran across a 67 Camaro and a 65 Vette that I am considering
The Shadow said:Im just amazed that the jeep is that quick.
The prices locally for amg's are a bit steep imo....2001 with 45,000 on it is running 48k
bullett said:LMAO,
"tuning" to AMG specs would include replacing the engine, transmission, suspension, brakes, exhaust, the computer, tires, and wheels....
These are all different for the AMG vehicle....
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










