Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Arms, what and how did you make them "grow"...

MrRTTB

New member
This post is for those who has small arms, but who changed their training some way to target the arms and by that got great results.

What did you do, and how did you work them out. Did you use high reps, low reps?
 
ok, seriously, just get bigger overall - increase your bench, rows, squats and deadlift numbers and eat big, get big, your arms will grow.
 
squats, deadlift, bench, over head press, direct bi work/tri work 2-3 times per week, eat, rest.
 
There are no magic exercises. Gain bodyweight while getting stronger at the big compound lifts like bench, overhead press, rows, pullups . . . toss in a decent bicep exercise like the BB/DB curl and a decent tricep exercise like skullcrushers, close-grip bench, and get better at those. Work 'em a few times/wk.
 
Protobuilder said:
There are no magic exercises. Gain bodyweight while getting stronger at the big compound lifts like bench, overhead press, rows, pullups . . . toss in a decent bicep exercise like the BB/DB curl and a decent tricep exercise like skullcrushers, close-grip bench, and get better at those. Work 'em a few times/wk.
^^^ this isn't what you wanted to hear, but it's how it works.

unless you have Arnold like genetics and gallons of AAS to use.
 
^ you heard it right there above.....

one thing that i worked for me personally was switching up my routine regularly.....after focusing on compounds for 6-8 weeks, i went to straight up isolation lifts for another 4-6 weeks....biceps responded very well to that.....smaller muscles like the biceps typically respond better with relatively lower weights at high reps.....high enough where you get the "burn" and you can't go another rep.....
 
For the most part arm size is genetic. focus on whats gonna make your whole body bigger. and then tweak with a little isolation. dont waste your time looking for the perfect arm routine. put a hundred pounds on each of your compund lifts and you will grow. for me i do 3 sets of 10 for curls on monday and 3 sets of 10 with weighted dips on friday. for a reference point im 200 lbs with just a shade under 18" ... it can be done.
 
enigma4dub said:
For the most part arm size is genetic. focus on whats gonna make your whole body bigger. for a reference point im 200 lbs with just a shade under 18" ... it can be done.
lol... prime example of Great arm genetics ^^^
 
MrRTTB said:
This post is for those who has small arms, but who changed their training some way to target the arms and by that got great results.

What did you do, and how did you work them out. Did you use high reps, low reps?


as far as the gym, ...this is what worked for me; when you hit the gym to workout a particular part or (area) of your body, make sure you get a quick set of a arm workout.
i focused on just tri\bi. whatever your routine is for that day, make sure you get 1 set in. .......push your self, drop the reps,and add on the weight. go heavy , and switch it up. hit your arms from another angle.
if your diet is spot-on, you will be happy with the results. in my case i just needed more cal. intake. good luck
 
Inhibitor13 said:
Im 170 with 16" arms.... I read somewhere on here that every 10lbs of weight you put on is 1" on the arms.

Inhibitor

Yea, and every 13lbs is 3/4th" to the inner chest.....you read wrong.
 
Would you guys suggest women follow this advice as well?
I have trouble getting my bi's to grow. I think I try to lift too heavy and maybe lifting less weight for more reps is the key?
Any advice from the ladies and gents?!
 
sgtslaughter said:
Increased bodyweight with respectively increased core lifts does add to your arms.

I understand that, but theres no magic formula, like 24lbs each 2.4 inches to your arms, which is what hes suggesting.
 
ZGzaZ said:
I understand that, but theres no magic formula, like 24lbs each 2.4 inches to your arms, which is what hes suggesting.
Ok, I hear ya.

I have read that though as well. And I believe the more bodyweight you have... the more muscle (20lbs+) you need to put on to see noticeable arm size.

It all comes down to getting bigger (quality muscle wise). No one wants 20" flabby guns.
 
blueta2 said:
Would you guys suggest women follow this advice as well?
I have trouble getting my bi's to grow. I think I try to lift too heavy and maybe lifting less weight for more reps is the key?
Any advice from the ladies and gents?!


......i think that all depends on how long you have been training your arms.
if you can see definition (cut) in your arms,then you will need to shift gears and add on the weight. but if your just starting out,start light with 10 - to 12 reps. gradually, you will reach a point where you will have to add on weight or you will never grow more muscle, or even more cut. also hit those bi 's from another angle.
 
Inhibitor13 said:
Im 170 with 16" arms.... I read somewhere on here that every 10lbs of weight you put on is 1" on the arms.

Inhibitor



.......are you sure ? i m having a hard time believing that.
 
jordanyfz said:
......i think that all depends on how long you have been training your arms.
if you can see definition (cut) in your arms,then you will need to shift gears and add on the weight. but if your just starting out,start light with 10 - to 12 reps. gradually, you will reach a point where you will have to add on weight or you will never grow more muscle, or even more cut. also hit those bi 's from another angle.

I have cuts on my arms but they are still not defined as much as I would like.
I have been lifting for almost 8 yrs so it's high time to get the cuts I want, but can't seem to.
I, of course, have upped my weight over the years, but still no super gains
 
blueta2 said:
I have cuts on my arms but they are still not defined as much as I would like.
I have been lifting for almost 8 yrs so it's high time to get the cuts I want, but can't seem to.
I, of course, have upped my weight over the years, but still no super gains
"Definition"/cuts = less fat covering the muscle

= Proper Diet, not training

We are hijacking the shit out of this guys thread.

Blueta post a new thread if you want to review your goals and talk about diet.
 
jordanyfz said:
as far as the gym, ...this is what worked for me; when you hit the gym to workout a particular part or (area) of your body, make sure you get a quick set of a arm workout.
i focused on just tri\bi. whatever your routine is for that day, make sure you get 1 set in. .......push your self, drop the reps,and add on the weight. go heavy , and switch it up. hit your arms from another angle.
if your diet is spot-on, you will be happy with the results. in my case i just needed more cal. intake. good luck

Please don't take this dog shit advice - it is wrong - "hit your arms from another angle" lol - I just pissed my panties reading that

Also - "when you hit the gym to workout a particular part or (area) of your body, make sure you get a quick set of a arm workout."

Now that is crappy advice. B/c everyone knows you need to train arms at least 2x a day if not more.
 
sgtslaughter said:
care to elaborate on the positive effects of doing this?

...yes sgt. for example triceps,cable push downs, then single arm push downs. same muscle, one with differant angle of movement, and stabalizer muscles. .....right ?
 
jordanyfz said:
...yes sgt. for example triceps,cable push downs, then single arm push downs. same muscle, one with differant angle of movement, and stabalizer muscles. .....right ?
No, this is not advice that most of us on the training board take as having a positive impact to training. Most of us rely on heavy compound movements and throw in a few "fluff" (curls and press downs) once a week because it's guaranteed to work and not the new M & F exercise regimen of the week.

Your biceps insertion points will never change, that's genetic. The size of your muscles may increase and may have seemed to be "re-shaped" but that's not possible on this planet.... may be possible surgically though.

Also, we have what are called "newbie" gains. Which someone may experience trying something new out for the first time... but then those gains stop and they continue switching up "stuff" for the rest of their lifting career looking for the magic routine.

We preach no magic. Get better at the big lifts and you will progress no matter what and look better (compeletly diet dependent though).
 
I added pull ups into my routine and that's what started packing on some meat. I also added Bi's/Tri's in twice a week.
 
al420 said:
Please don't take this dog shit advice - it is wrong - "hit your arms from another angle" lol - I just pissed my panties reading that

Also - "when you hit the gym to workout a particular part or (area) of your body, make sure you get a quick set of a arm workout."

Now that is crappy advice. B/c everyone knows you need to train arms at least 2x a day if not more.


first of all . right or wrong no one was asked this. we where simply asked...... what worked for you. i am not saying i am right , or wrong. i am only stating what i have noticed that worked for me. and oh b.t.w dont call someone out on something and run like a little bitch. you got something possotive to contribute to this thread, lets hear it. but dont just say dont take dog shit advice and not help. if thats the case, your the piece of shit .
 
sgtslaughter said:
No, this is not advice that most of us on the training board take as having a positive impact to training. Most of us rely on heavy compound movements and throw in a few "fluff" (curls and press downs) once a week because it's guaranteed to work and not the new M & F exercise regimen of the week.

Your biceps insertion points will never change, that's genetic. The size of your muscles may increase and may have seemed to be "re-shaped" but that's not possible on this planet.... may be possible surgically though.

Also, we have what are called "newbie" gains. Which someone may experience trying something new out for the first time... but then those gains stop and they continue switching up "stuff" for the rest of their lifting career looking for the magic routine.

We preach no magic. Get better at the big lifts and you will progress no matter what and look better (compeletly diet dependent though).

.....thanx for the explenation big bro


just wanna say i reread your post andit registered. makes sence.
 
sgtslaughter said:
"Definition"/cuts = less fat covering the muscle

= Proper Diet, not training

We are hijacking the shit out of this guys thread.

Blueta post a new thread if you want to review your goals and talk about diet.


No one is hijacking! psssst!
Less fat covering the muscle? Now that is not the best advice either.
You can have very low bf and diet til the cows come home, this is not going to build size on the arms.
 
blueta2 said:
No one is hijacking! psssst!
Less fat covering the muscle? Now that is not the best advice either.
You can have very low bf and diet til the cows come home, this is not going to build size on the arms.
This is what I was repling to:
blueta2 said:
I have cuts on my arms but they are still not defined as much as I would like. I have been lifting for almost 8 yrs so it's high time to get the cuts I want, but can't seem to.
... to see that = less BF.

Size on arms = keep training and eating :)
 
All I can say for arms is that there are no real tricks. Generally speaking, genetic arm freaks like the 1st Mr. O, Larry Scott and a guy like enigma4dub aside, most people need a really big body to have really big arms. As a whole, most guys are not gonna see 20" arms if they don't weigh about 250-275lbs. It is why the Abercrombie boys at the gym who do nothing but curl with every peice of equipment from every angle invented do not have 20" arms to compliment their 150lb geek bodies.

Most guys seeking arm training advice seem to be at a point where they have reached a level of development, say 5'10 and 185lbs with a 16" arm, really at that size, a 16" arm is pretty impressive, and not too many 5'10" 185lbers (again, freaky people aside) are gonna have a much bigger arm, so the anser is build your bdy up more and prime it to carry bigger arms, get up to 220 at 5' 10 and you'll see maybe an 18" measurement.

For training, don't lose track of common sense, one or 2 solid lifts like barbell curls and hammer curls, get good at them, eat for your goals. I will say that chins make your biceps stronger and will most likely have direct carryover to arm work (more weight curled will stimulate greater gains).

Being 'ripped' is a matter of bodyfat %, if you want more defined arms, you have to do it in the kitchen, no exercise under the sun will "cut you up".
 
I never had what you would call small arms so maybe this isn't the information you want but the bulk of my arm work has just been the compound lifts and at the end of chest day Id do some kinda of burnout for triceps and at the end of back day a burnout exercise for biceps. Basically just dips/cgp and preacher curls is the only isolation I do, went from 315lb with 16" arms to 230lb with 18" arms.
 
Squat for bigger arms. Do some direct arm-work to "fill them out".

Some direct work will give them the usual swelling that any muscle suffers from being worked but the main growth will come from getting bigger overall. If your arms get trained to the point where they are too large for your body then they are going to shrink back down at the first opportunity.
 
Less fat covering the muscle? Now that is not the best advice either.

it's the best advice there is, for anyone not involved in strength sports who needs the extra bf for cushioning

low bodyfat gives 'cuts' and with it the illusion of larger measurements.

there's delusional fatties on EF who like to brag about their imaginary 'bad boy' 22" arms (which is obviously bullshit as anyone not 5'2" would need to be around 280 to have arms that size).. but for comparison when a 'bad boy' 18" (a generous estimate on my part) lunch-lady arm is compared to a cut up 16.5" er the smaller arm will look much more impressive.
 
lol @ lunch-lady arms.

As someone who currently is around 280 with lunch-lady arms, I can vouch for Tweakle's post. My arms looked much better and were more imposing a couple of inches ago.
 
Top Bottom