shoestring
New member
Are ICN's really 1.2ml? If this is the case then that means that they are 300mg not 250mg right?? Ret, you must know for sure..
shoestring said:Are ICN's really 1.2ml? If this is the case then that means that they are 300mg not 250mg right?? Ret, you must know for sure..
instant.muscle said:thats nothing, Iranians say 250 but test out at 333mg
GOLUAN said:yeah, a lot of sources still have that batch number in stock...
Yes most batches I`ve seen were overfilled.. 1.1cc or 1.2cc per amp... that doesnt mean they are 300mg per amp. It might be extra oil. but looks much better than underfilled niles for sureshoestring said:Are ICN's really 1.2ml? If this is the case then that means that they are 300mg not 250mg right?? Ret, you must know for sure..
Those rumours are getting crazy. One batch had tested at 333mg and it was long time ago, actually I dont like iranian test, to me its underdosed, ICNs work better... and I dont believe those 333mf/1ml test results that much either... Its not bad but still I prefer ICNs...instant.muscle said:thats nothing, Iranians say 250 but test out at 333mg
looking to lean said:whats wrong with amps? get an opener... easy![]()
Retabolil2 said:Those rumours are getting crazy. One batch had tested at 333mg and it was long time ago, actually I dont like iranian test, to me its underdosed, ICNs work better... and I dont believe those 333mf/1ml test results that much either... Its not bad but still I prefer ICNs...
LOL!Guvna said:you ever had any other batches tested?
string_bean00 said:Just because it's overfilled doesn't mean there is more test in the amp. The folks at ICN could be adjusting each amp fill according to how that batch came out...
ie, 250mg/1.2ml
250mg/1.5ml
250mg/1ml
etc
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










