great example of how when something is repeated often enough, it becomes a "fact".
1) studies have shown no progesterone effect from anadrol
2) anadrol doesnt aromatize
3) in any event, AI such as arimidex and AIFM are of limited/ancillary if any value in management of progesterone sides. so says SCIENCE. Speculation and hypothesis may say otherwise.
I've been tru this patch before, I'll leave it at that. anyone interested now has sufficient info to look into the SCIENCE of the matter (as opposed to throwaway atatements in a post).
from any number of steroid profiles:
...It is important to note however, that this drug does not directly convert to estrogen in the body. Oxymetholone is a derivative of dihydrotestosterone, which gives it a structure that cannot be aromatized. As such, many have speculated as to what makes this hormone so troublesome in terms of estrogenic side effects. Some have suggested that it has progestational activity, similar to nandrolone, and is not actually estrogenic at all. Since the obvious side effects of both estrogens and progestins are very similar, this explanation might be a plausible one. However we do find medical studies looking at this possibility. One such tested the progestational activity of various steroids including nandrolone, norethandrolone, methandrostenolone, testosterone and oxymetholone 3. It reported no significant progestational effect inherent in oxymetholone or methandrostenolone, slight activity with testosterone and strong progestational effect inherent in nandrolone and norethandrolone...