Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Anadrol+Fina=Progresterone(spell?)

BJJ

New member
I did a search on the subject,but didnt get the answeres i was looking for..........is a anadrol and fina cycle going give me progresterone???:confused:
 
...it might
take some winny and have some ru486 on hand
that cycle is also gonna do a number on your liver and kidneys bro
i wouldn't do it, but if you do make sure you have plenty of ala, cranberry extract, etc.
 
the actually DECREASE the level of NATURAL PROGESTERONE.

they, at least FINA for sure, are Progestins. WHich means that they can "cause" progestenic gyno.. though sensitivity to progestins varies considerably.
 
excuse my ignorance

but what is ru486 and if it is legal where can I get it ?
 
I have heard a lot of bad shit about RU486..do a search and get some more opionions.

Personally I would not do those two together since they both could interact with progesteron receptors.

I am not a big fan of anadrol..but get some more opinions...I know a lot of guys love the shit.
 
help me out here, by progestin do you mean like progesterone? I am no chemist but I just compared the molecular structure of the two and they are not even close to being alike. Are you sure TA is a progestin? I will grant you that TA does bind to the PR in bovine uterus but I would not care to draw many conclusions from that concerning human breast tissue. Everyone speaks with such certainty of things which to me are speculative at best. If possible, could you point me in the direction i need to go to confirm the progestenic nature of TA?


macrophage69alpha said:
the actually DECREASE the level of NATURAL PROGESTERONE.

they, at least FINA for sure, are Progestins. WHich means that they can "cause" progestenic gyno.. though sensitivity to progestins varies considerably.
 
This was written by Llewellyn


"Progestational Activity

It has been reported in other bodybuilding literature that trenbolone does not exhibit any activity as a progestin in the body. I am not certain where this belief originated, as trenbolone does appear to exhibit the classic progesterone receptor binding ability that is characteristic of nandrolone and its derivatives. One study looking at the bovine uterine progesterone receptor for example found trenbolone to be a very potent binder, startlingly even more so than progesterone itself (4). Another looking at the binding of various compounds to the androgen, estrogen, progestin, mineral corticoid and glucocorticoid receptors found trenbolone to be a more potent binder of the progestin receptor than nandrolone (5), a steroid normally noted for its usual activity in this regard. What does this mean for trenbolone? I don’t think it really means that much. Trenbolone clearly doesn’t cause gyno, water retention or fat buildup, which one might attribute to estrogenic or progestational activity. So whatever slight action it does have as a progestin on paper doesn’t amount to all that much in the real world. The absence of estrogen may be a significant factor, as progesterone is believed to cause gyno by enhancing estrogen’s stimulation of mammary gland growth (6). Perhaps when trenbolone is taken with other aromatizable compounds it could affect a person’s sensitivity level to gyno and water/fat retention. This seems logical, at least in a technical sense, although admittedly I have seen no evidence to support this."
 
I've done an anadrol fina cycle with no problems. And I'm about to run another with 100mgs anadrol ed / 75-100mgs fina ed and I'm not worried at all. Of course it could happen but I don't think you need to worry unless your a sensitive individual.
 
strong island said:
This was written by Llewellyn


"Progestational Activity

It has been reported in other bodybuilding literature that trenbolone does not exhibit any activity as a progestin in the body. I am not certain where this belief originated, as trenbolone does appear to exhibit the classic progesterone receptor binding ability that is characteristic of nandrolone and its derivatives. One study looking at the bovine uterine progesterone receptor for example found trenbolone to be a very potent binder, startlingly even more so than progesterone itself (4). Another looking at the binding of various compounds to the androgen, estrogen, progestin, mineral corticoid and glucocorticoid receptors found trenbolone to be a more potent binder of the progestin receptor than nandrolone (5), a steroid normally noted for its usual activity in this regard. What does this mean for trenbolone? I don’t think it really means that much. Trenbolone clearly doesn’t cause gyno, water retention or fat buildup, which one might attribute to estrogenic or progestational activity. So whatever slight action it does have as a progestin on paper doesn’t amount to all that much in the real world. The absence of estrogen may be a significant factor, as progesterone is believed to cause gyno by enhancing estrogen’s stimulation of mammary gland growth (6). Perhaps when trenbolone is taken with other aromatizable compounds it could affect a person’s sensitivity level to gyno and water/fat retention. This seems logical, at least in a technical sense, although admittedly I have seen no evidence to support this."

actually tren DOES clearly cause GYNO at least in some individuals.. the number of people reporting gyno(on this website alone) from TREN only cycles while small is SIGNIFICANT.
 
from my observations i would have to say there is some synergism with the fina and anadrol in regard to gyno.
 
I think once again we are back at the old saw that "everyone" is different. I have done 150mg of anadrol a day along with 200mg of tren a day with NO gyno. Others, it would seem, can do 75 mg eod of tren and get gyno symptoms. I have no argument with those that report gyno on tren only with those that are so sure of why this occurs and the surety that it will occur! Just because tren binds to the pr in a cows uterus, there is NO clear extrapolation to human breast tissue.. Even in human studies we find certain chems that bind to receptors in different parts of the body and act the opposite, either as an agonist or antagonist. So to assume that the gyno came from the pr and to further assume that winny will prevent it(another anecdotal report not supported by any reearch conclusion) is a leap of faith that I prefer not to make. Would it be accurate to say that some folks report gyno from tren, yes! Could you further say that winny "might" help with it according to some folks(note that others say exactly the opposite.)-yes! Do we know any of this to lbe a fact-NO!
 
Top Bottom