Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Aliens have created humans!

  • Thread starter Thread starter SSAlexSS
  • Start date Start date
S

SSAlexSS

Guest
THE CASE OF ADAM’S ALIEN GENES

In whose image was The Adam – the prototype of modern humans, Homo sapiens – created?

The Bible asserts that the Elohim said: “Let us fashion the Adam in our image and after our likeness.” But if one is to accept a tentative explanation for enigmatic genes that humans possess, offered when the deciphering of the human genome was announced in mid-February, the feat was decided upon by a group of bacteria!

“Humbling” was the prevalent adjective used by the scientific teams and the media to describe the principal finding – that the human genome contains not the anticipated 100,000 - 140,000 genes (the stretches of DNA that direct the production of amino-acids and proteins) but only some 30,000+ -- little more than double the 13,601 genes of a fruit fly and barely fifty percent more than the roundworm’s 19,098. What a comedown from the pinnacle of the genomic Tree of Life!

Moreover, there was hardly any uniqueness to the human genes. They are comparative to not the presumed 95 percent but to almost 99 percent of the chimpanzees, and 70 percent of the mouse. Human genes, with the same functions, were found to be identical to genes of other vertebrates, as well as invertebrates, plants, fungi, even yeast. The findings not only confirmed that there was one source of DNA for all life on Earth, but also enabled the scientists to trace the evolutionary process – how more complex organisms evolved, genetically, from simpler ones, adopting at each stage the genes of a lower life form to create a more complex higher life form – culminating with Homo sapiens.


The “Head-scratching” Discovery

It was here, in tracing the vertical evolutionary record contained in the human and the other analyzed genomes, that the scientists ran into an enigma. The “head-scratching discovery by the public consortium,” as Science termed it, was that the human genome contains 223 genes that do not have the required predecessors on the genomic evolutionary tree.

How did Man acquire such a bunch of enigmatic genes?

In the evolutionary progression from bacteria to invertebrates (such as the lineages of yeast, worms, flies or mustard weed – which have been deciphered) to vertebrates (mice, chimpanzees) and finally modern humans, these 223 genes are completely missing in the invertebrate phase. Therefore, the scientists can explain their presence in the human genome by a “rather recent” (in evolutionary time scales) “probable horizontal transfer from bacteria.”

In other words: At a relatively recent time as Evolution goes, modern humans acquired an extra 223 genes not through gradual evolution, not vertically on the Tree of Life, but horizontally, as a sideways insertion of genetic material from bacteria…


An Immense Difference

Now, at first glance it would seem that 223 genes is no big deal. In fact, while every single gene makes a great difference to every individual, 223 genes make an immense difference to a species such as ours.

The human genome is made up of about three billion neucleotides (the “letters” A-C-G-T which stand for the initials of the four nucleic acids that spell out all life on Earth); of them, just a little more than one percent are grouped into functioning genes (each gene consists of thousands of "letters"). The difference between one individual person and another amounts to about one “letter” in a thousand in the DNA “alphabet.” The difference between Man and Chimpanzee is less than one percent as genes go; and one percent of 30,000 genes is 300.

So, 223 genes is more than two thirds of the difference between me, you and a chimpanzee!

An analysis of the functions of these genes through the proteins that they spell out, conducted by the Public Consortium team and published in the journal Nature, shows that they include not only proteins involved in important physiological but also psychiatric functions. Moreover, they are responsible for important neurological enzymes that stem only from the mitochondrial portion of the DNA – the so-called “Eve” DNA that humankind inherited only through the mother-line, all the way back to a single “Eve.” That finding alone raises doubt regarding that the "bacterial insertion" explanation.


A Shaky Theory

How sure are the scientists that such important and complex genes, such an immense human advantage, was obtained by us --“rather recently”-- through the courtesy of infecting bacteria?

“It is a jump that does not follow current evolutionary theories,” said Steven Scherer, director of mapping of the Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine.

“We did not identify a strongly preferred bacterial source for the putative horizontally transferred genes,” states the report in Nature. The Public Consortium team, conducting a detailed search, found that some 113 genes (out of the 223) “are widespread among bacteria” – though they are entirely absent even in invertebrates. An analysis of the proteins which the enigmatic genes express showed that out of 35 identified, only ten had counterparts in vertebrates (ranging from cows to rodents to fish); 25 of the 35 were unique to humans.

“It is not clear whether the transfer was from bacteria to human or from human to bacteria,” Science quoted Robert Waterson, co-director of Washington University’s Genome Sequencing Center, as saying.

But if Man gave those genes to bacteria, where did Man acquire those genes to begin with?


The Role of the Anunnaki

Readers of my books must be smiling by now, for they know the answer.

They know that the biblical verses dealing with the fashioning of The Adam are condensed renderings of much much more detailed Sumerian and Akkadian texts, found inscribed on clay tablets, in which the role of the Elohim in Genesis is performed by the Anunnaki – “Those Who From Heaven to Earth Came.”

As detailed in my books, beginning with The 12th Planet (1976) and even more so in Genesis Revisited and The Cosmic Code, the Anunnaki came to Earth some 450,000 years ago from the planet Nibiru – a member of our own solar system whose great orbit brings it to our part of the heavens once every 3,600 years. They came here in need of gold, with which to protect their dwindling atmosphere. Exhausted and in need of help in mining the gold, their chief scientist Enki suggested that they use their genetic knowledge to create the needed Primitive Workers. When the other leaders of the Anunnaki asked: How can you create a new being? He answered:

"The being that we need already exists;
all that we have to do is put our mark on it.”

The time was some 300,000 years ago.

What he had in mind was to upgrade genetically the existing hominids, who were already on Earth through Evolution, by adding some of the genes of the more advanced Anunnaki. That the Anunnaki, who could already travel in space 450,000 years ago, possessed the genomic science (whose threshold we have now reached) is clear not only from the actual texts but also from numerous depictions in which the double-helix of the DNA is rendered as Entwined Serpents (a symbol still used for medicine and healing) -- see illustration ‘A’ below.

When the leaders of the Anunnaki approved the project (as echoed in the biblical ”Let us fashion the Adam”), Enki with the help of Ninharsag, the Chief Medical Officer of the Anunnaki, embarked on a process of genetic engineering, by adding and combining genes of the Anunnaki with those of the already-existing hominids.

When, after much trial and error breathtakingly described and recorded in antiquity, a “perfect model” was attained, Ninharsag held him up and shouted: “My hands have made it!” An ancient artist depicted the scene on a cylinder seal (illustration ‘B’).

And that, I suggest, is how we had come to possess the unique extra genes. It was in the image of the Anunnaki, not of bacteria, that Adam and Eve were fashioned.


A Matter of Extreme Significance

Unless further scientific research can establish, beyond any doubt, that the only possible source of the extra genes are indeed bacteria, and unless it is then also determined that the infection (“horizontal transfer”) went from bacteria to Man and not from Man to bacteria, the only other available solution will be that offered by the Sumerian texts millennia ago.

Until then, the enigmatic 223 alien genes will remain as an alternative – and as a corroboration by modern science of the Anunnaki and their genetic feats on Earth.

Zecharia Sitchin.
 
Wow a ripped off article from somebody who seems to like to twist science around to suit his own needs......so what does this prove??? ABSOLUTELY DIDDLY SQUAT!!!!
 
Re: Re: Aliens have created humans!

Imnotdutch said:
Wow a ripped off article from somebody who seems to like to twist science around to suit his own needs......so what does this prove??? ABSOLUTELY DIDDLY SQUAT!!!!



Proves? We got 300 genes out of nowhere inserted of us! It doesnt happen naturally so the only other, possible solution is
somewhat of a "biblical creationism" with modern terminology, namely, aliens.

300 genes is enough to completely change a species into something else.... hmmm..... dumb monkeys changing into humans .... That how humans appeared. Not through evolution since such things dont happen in evolution!
 
don't even get me started on this.. i just recently wrote a paper about this.... the digger you deep in to this the more sense it makes, and the less proof you find for it not to be true!

There’s a Sumerian cylinder seal in a German museum that has a map of every planet in our solar system including Pluto . This is from the same civilization Sitchin refers to(sumerians) that the Anunnaki created and.

Also…
Strangely enough the Sumerian medical seal is the same as ours today. 2 snakes intertwined around a thing with the wings on top. This today is meant to represent our DNA strand. How did they know about DNA back then?

IRONICLY the main land this civilization lived, and all this stuff took place is in IRAQ.

Freaky huh...
:freak:
 
Diesel3d said:
Strangely enough the Sumerian medical seal is the same as ours today. 2 snakes intertwined around a thing with the wings on top. This today is meant to represent our DNA strand. How did they know about DNA back then?

:freak: [/B]

That 'thing' does not represent a DNA strand it represents a parasitic worm. Obviously you did not do your research very well!!! The worm is wrapped around a stick which is the common way of removing the parasite!!!
 
Re: Re: Re: Aliens have created humans!

You are not listening at all......

WE DO NOT HAVE THE DNA SEQUENCE FOR MANY ORGANSIMS SO WE DO NOT KNOW THAT THESE GENES ARE EXTRA!!!

Your last paragragh makes no sense......I assume this is because you are typing as you have a thought....that jumbles my writing up to. Please rewrite it so I can understand.

SSAlexSS said:




Proves? We got 300 genes out of nowhere inserted of us! It doesnt happen naturally so the only other, possible solution is
somewhat of a "biblical creationism" with modern terminology, namely, aliens.

300 genes is enough to completely change a species into something else.... hmmm..... dumb monkeys changing into humans .... That how humans appeared. Not through evolution since such things dont happen in evolution!
 
Imnotdutch said:


That 'thing' does not represent a DNA strand it represents a parasitic worm. Obviously you did not do your research very well!!! The worm is wrapped around a stick which is the common way of removing the parasite!!!

either way the logo still represents a visual of dna. I’m not sure where i read that's what ours represents, but i did somewhere. Either way it would not matter, because it could have meant that for them, but not for us.
 
What you read was somebody elses interpretation of what they saw. Interpretations depend upon the person and what they want to believe. NOBODY can know that the symbol is meant to represent DNA.

Did you also read that it represents the same thing as our current symbol?? If so, whoever wrote the article obviously didn't have a clue.

Diesel3d said:


either way the logo still represents a visual of dna. I’m not sure where i read that's what ours represents, but i did somewhere. Either way it would not matter, because it could have meant that for them, but not for us.
 
note the size comparisons of the Sumerian depiction of out solar system. Mars is shown smaller that earth , big bigger than mercury etc..
 
you guys might find it more worthwhile to actually read the stuff published by the scientists that work on the genome project instead of the stuff filtered out by someone that has their own agenda.

people that want to get across ideas will frequently do what is done in this article - you state one fact, and say, see that is true, therefore... and then you say whatever the fuck you want. then you claim that since the first is true, the second must be true... not so.

there is some fascinating stuff out there, but to immediately say that it must be aliens that cause it because you don't understand it is... well, moronic and quite frankly should cause embarassment on your part.
the difference between any one human in the world is incredibly small. the difference between us and any chimp is also relatively not that large.
but the difference between rats within two blocks of NYC are wildly different. that shows that rats are better at diversifying their gene pool.
there is a block of genes that are unaccounted for - in that they don't do anything, they just get replicated and passed along. most are things that we one time used and or needed - more bodyhair, better sense of smell as we were closer to the ground (once we stand more upright, sight becomes more important in day to day life than scent). but to say they are of alien origin... that would be an aumsing first jump.

on a side note, the reason that a fruit fly and a human share many of the same genes would be the same reason that any living thing on the planet and us will share many of the same genes - it is to make us more efficient - there is no need for every species to reinvent the wheel when it comes to cellular division or mitochondria creation, etc etc - it is like shared code in programming.
 
HappyScrappy said:
you guys might find it more worthwhile to actually read the stuff published by the scientists that work on the genome project instead of the stuff filtered out by someone that has their own agenda.

people that want to get across ideas will frequently do what is done in this article - you state one fact, and say, see that is true, therefore... and then you say whatever the fuck you want. then you claim that since the first is true, the second must be true... not so.

there is some fascinating stuff out there, but to immediately say that it must be aliens that cause it because you don't understand it is... well, moronic and quite frankly should cause embarassment on your part.
the difference between any one human in the world is incredibly small. the difference between us and any chimp is also relatively not that large.
but the difference between rats within two blocks of NYC are wildly different. that shows that rats are better at diversifying their gene pool.
there is a block of genes that are unaccounted for - in that they don't do anything, they just get replicated and passed along. most are things that we one time used and or needed - more bodyhair, better sense of smell as we were closer to the ground (once we stand more upright, sight becomes more important in day to day life than scent). but to say they are of alien origin... that would be an aumsing first jump.

on a side note, the reason that a fruit fly and a human share many of the same genes would be the same reason that any living thing on the planet and us will share many of the same genes - it is to make us more efficient - there is no need for every species to reinvent the wheel when it comes to cellular division or mitochondria creation, etc etc - it is like shared code in programming.



The scientists are not concerned with "politicly incorrect" truth!!!


Look I am using this example as well.... Government denied the existence of area 51 even when pictures where presented. If they deny that with hundreds of photos, a text gonna do nothing.

Government says that UFOs are weather phenomenons, blims on radar screen, equipment malfunction etc. How are they then able to track it from two distinct locations? Not possible unless the object is there.

If I see barney while being high, you wont see because it doesnt exist. Howeever if the object is real and is there we both gonna see it because it exists, same is here.


Monkeys are different from us in such a way that it would take millions of years for them to change into us. Not sudden "change"
that takes in matter of years or less!

All this unaccounted for dna is not that important as you make it of it. We have it since we can trace back to where all living things on earth were when they first appeared on earth. Look you dont need to know all the strands to figure everything out! Today with DNA tech through mitochondria you can determine who your parents were like many hundreds and thousands of years ago (including where they lived).

So same thing here.



Rats are similiar to rats living next door. i wont rebute your post because that rat thing is totally wrong and show that you dont undertstand.
 
Last edited:
lol - that was the funniest post I've read in awhile. I was going to show you links and point out faults in your logic - but I'm pretty sure this has to just be a joke to pass your idle time.
 
Diesel3d said:


either way the logo still represents a visual of dna. I’m not sure where i read that's what ours represents, but i did somewhere. Either way it would not matter, because it could have meant that for them, but not for us.

It could represent basket weaving for all we know. Seriously. Just because it's their "medical" seal, that doesn't mean it's meant to represent DNA. You can only hypothesize on it's meaning, not make a statement of fact.
 
Is Planet X on that Sumerian astro-chart? I don't see it.

How could they miss it? What a bunch of ignortant alien bitches.
 
dude as soon as you said that you could tell where my parents lived hundreds of thousands of years ago... you lost my support!

unless the standard answer is "somewhere on earth", that is some seriously faulty research.
 
sigweed said:
dude as soon as you said that you could tell where my parents lived hundreds of thousands of years ago... you lost my support!

unless the standard answer is "somewhere on earth", that is some seriously faulty research.


They have that technology now! It is very recent, watch science programs.

We move at the fast pace, there are probably inventions going on now that are really great yet we dont even know about them!
 
SSAlexSS said:



All this unaccounted for dna is not that important as you make it of it. We have it since we can trace back to where all living things on earth were when they first appeared on earth. Look you dont need to know all the strands to figure everything out! Today with DNA tech through mitochondria you can determine who your parents were like many hundreds and thousands of years ago (including where they lived).

So same thing here.


Uhhh no you can't. That particular branch of science is full of potential errors........unfortunately those erros are rarely discussed on TV!!

BTW Star Trek doesn't count as a science program.
 
I wish I were high right now...this would be way way more intertaining.
 
The Dude said:


It could represent basket weaving for all we know. Seriously. Just because it's their "medical" seal, that doesn't mean it's meant to represent DNA. You can only hypothesize on it's meaning, not make a statement of fact.

I by no means meant to come off saying that stuff is all fact. Notice i used the word "could".

I do agree with you , but the only way to be sure is to research the Sumerian translations.

Zecharia Sitchin is able translate as well as many others, the Sumerian texts. The research he did for his books were translated right from the official tablets. His beliefs are based on the Sumerian mythology; he sates them as real though. heh. Although he makes very good points there are many flaws in his work that I just don't agree with... and some I can go with. It's been 24 years since his first book when he wrote about all this and no other Sumerian translator has gone against him to say his translations are wrong, they are all very similar. Everyone interprets translations their own way. That’s the problem with all this stuff. Even today we still can't understand some ancient Egyptian texts.

He does make a very good comparison to the mythology and the bible which is very interesting.

i would suggest reading this to anyone who really wants to learn more about this. I wrote it off ass wacky when i first heard the stories about what his books were about like many of you here are, but it's best to read his books, do a little research about the Sumerian civilization and decide for yourself.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/A...2635870/sr=8-3/ref=sr_8_3/102-1674312-0908148

The bottom line is this is not some internet hoax. This guy actually did a lot of realistic research and work for years to write his books, so it's not wise to really come here and call this all bs with having not done any research.

In my opinion aliens from another planet that came down and created us or did something here on earth is more realistic than there being a god. And look how serious this world takes religion. We are at WAR because of religion !

Think about that. I bet most of you that post here believe in God/ALA/Whatever. You believe in an invisible man, yet you find all this stuff bs and there are texts, scrolls, tablets that explain all that they know. We also have proof that the civilization was very advanced( how did they know about Pluto? ) , brining support to the stories. The Sumerian mythology is very similar to the bible. The texts could be translated wrong, but how do you know the bible was not translated wrong too? The bible could have been created from passed on stories of the Sumerian mythology, who the hell knows.. That would explain a lot though.


I will say one thing. Aliens with advanced technology could easily be depicted and described as gods by people who were under control by them, who later on passed on stories calling them “gods” instead of “aliens”. Think of the movie stargate. You never know lol.


P.s the Sumerians refer to earth as the 7th planet in the solar system….. Counting from outside the system itself. Fucked up huh…
:freak:

Please excuse me while i adjust my tinfoil hat ;)
 
Last edited:
Diesel3d said:

In my opinion aliens from another planet that came down and created us or did something here on earth is more realistic than there being a god. And look how serious this world takes religion. We are at WAR because of religion !


Except that there is Tons more evidence of our Evolution on THIS planet than there is of aliens in general, yet alone aliens making us.

:rolleyes:
 
epimetheus said:



Except that there is Tons more evidence of our Evolution on THIS planet than there is of aliens in general, yet alone aliens making us.

:rolleyes:

True, but if you read his books you would understand they did not create us from scratch, they only speed up and improved the evolutionary process of the ape. There's is a huge gap in years from homoerectus to homosapien. It should have taken us a lot longer to evolve.
 
I would say 500,000 years was plenty of time for the gap between Homoerectus and HomoSapiens.

Evolve- 500,000 years between two species..
Alien force evolve- 500,000 years between species

Hmm, Occams razor seems to suggest that the Aliens are not really needed.


Really people, aliens are not a very cool idea. I don't know why everybody likes accrediting so much to them. In a real world setting, like the one we live in, there would be no way for them to hide themselves. Secrets like that do not hold.
 
epimetheus said:
I would say 500,000 years was plenty of time for the gap between Homoerectus and HomoSapiens.

Evolve- 500,000 years between two species..
Alien force evolve- 500,000 years between species

Hmm, Occams razor seems to suggest that the Aliens are not really needed.


Really people, aliens are not a very cool idea. I don't know why everybody likes accrediting so much to them. In a real world setting, like the one we live in, there would be no way for them to hide themselves. Secrets like that do not hold.

you do realize that homo habilis to homo erectus is 2.2 millions years right? 500,000 years later and we are Homo sapiens? It's actually less than 500,000.. It's around 200-400k years

How would they not be able to hid themselves? Do you really think humans are that smart? I bet they are sitting up there in box seats eating popcorn watching the stupidity show as we set nukes off and fly into buildings. If they can travel across the galaxy I’m sure they are smart enough to hid themselves if they really wanted to.

There's a lot of evidence out there of proof to aliens existence. When the Soviet Union broke up a lot of stuff surfaced, that was released form the KGB. Also, if you live in the US things are not reported to the public. UFO sightings are common news all over the world. It's less controversial, and more open-minded. American reporters never want to cover the topic in fear of ruining their career, and news brand credibility.
 
Top Bottom