98% polled support retalliation, *92% support full war

[HumanShell]

This was reported on CNN earlier. I'll keep an eye out to see how many people were polled, and where from.

 

[frorider6]

war with who?

 

[SAF]

war with who?

Exactly. There is no country to go to war with. People need to understand that terrorist groups do not represent countries, they are simply groups of people whose ethnic background and demographics cannot be used to trace back to a country and start a war with.

Just give it some time. The US will never let this settle, and eventually people will get answers.

SAF

 

[HumanShell]

They would support going to war over these actions, with the country/group/persons responsible.

 

[spkzx9r]

Exactly. There is no country to go to war with. People need to understand that terrorist groups do not represent countries, they are simply groups of people whose ethnic background and demographics cannot be used to trace back to a country and start a war with.

Just give it some time. The US will never let this settle, and eventually people will get answers.

SAF

\

I must disagree w/ you on that one, if it is bin ladin then Afgan. who openly supports him and let's him live and operate (ie. train)
will pay just as harshly as he.

 

[ryker77]

Send the Marines in.. We need some real training and we've got a bunch of new gear to try out in battle conditions..

 

[macDbol]

go to war with who? the country these terrorists call home

 

[spentagn]

there is no law stating that war must be declared on a country. war has been declared once before on a group, the barbary pirates. now its bin laden's turn. and the al qadafi. and everybody who supports them.

 

[frorider6]

Once the evidence of participation is in, I would fully support military black ops assassinations.

 

[2Thick]

This is probably not a scientific pole and it is definitely a piece of propaganda.

There are not that many stupid Americans out there... at least I hope not.

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

Holy shit he is back!

 

[WODIN]

look at it this ways 2thick when a lib. dem. like Diane Finestien is advocating war then you can bet your ass MOST of us want blood!

 

[2Thick]

look at it this ways 2thick when a lib. dem. like Diane Finestien is advocating war then you can bet your ass MOST of us want blood!

War....

Hmmmmm.....

More dead people....hmmmm

Does anyone remember Vietnam? Multiply that by 1 million and you have this war you speak of.

Americans are seriously mentally handicapped if they think killing more people will help anything.

Missile and strategic military bombings are a wiser choice.

 

[WODIN]

That's why we have big bombs that hit targets from long distances.

 

[frorider6]

Missile and strategic military bombings are a wiser choice.

I agree. Keep people as safe as possible while inflicting the greatest punishment possible.

 

[Rotten]

Sorry 2Thick but I think we should start by nuking all of Afganistan and work our way back through the Middle East.

 

[RealDeal]

You can declare war and not invade. It sounds like you are equating war with a full-scale invasion. We can declare war and fight strategically with well-targeted missiles, bombs, etc.

I wouldn't be opposed to an invasion, though, so long as the culprit is found to be a country, or a group supported or harbored by a country.

Your estimate of Vietnam * 1 million is total overkill bro. Maybe if this became WW3, but not war with a small country with no nuclear capability.