9/11 conspiracy movie

[beefcake28]

If some people spent less time blaiming the government and the rest of the world for their problems...they'd be a bit more happy.

I'm not blaming anybody for any events in my life. Chances are that any consequences dealt my way, good or bad, are a result of my own actions...

I'm just pointing out that there are an abnormal amount of inconsistancies in the explanations given by our government, and they don't want the general public to know about them...

 

[redguru]

I'm not blaming anybody for any events in my life. Chances are that any consequences dealt my way, good or bad, are a result of my own actions...

I'm just pointing out that there are an abnormal amount of inconsistancies in the explanations given by our government, and they don't want the general public to know about them...

But throwing a bunch of non-sequitors together and trying to ball it up into one big impossible conspiracy isn't the way to go about it. The only thing that I think bears scrutiny is that I believe that the plane that went down in PA was indeed shot down, the hero story played into the rabble-rousing at the time. I believe a cover-up there is plausible. Otherwise, the rest is not remotely plausible because the sheer number of people involved to keep it quiet.

As far as the twin towers being demo'd how did they get the charges above the damage to begin the cascade from the top?

 

[lowpro]

I'm just pointing out that there are an abnormal amount of inconsistancies in the explanations given by our government, and they don't want the general public to know about them...

I can understand that.

Being knee deep in a lot of this, I can also understand why the public doesn't have/need to know every monir detail. I'm not neccessarly talking about this particualr situation; but, in general. The public is left a blind eye by the government since the beginning of time. Sometimes we can't swallow it. Most of the time, it's for good reasons.

It's just sad to see everything turn into a conspiracy simply because we don't understand the why

 

[beefcake28]

I can understand that.

Being knee deep in a lot of this, I can also understand why the public doesn't have/need to know every monir detail. I'm not neccessarly talking about this particualr situation; but, in general. The public is left a blind eye by the government since the beginning of time. Sometimes we can't swallow it. Most of the time, it's for good reasons.

It's just sad to see everything turn into a conspiracy simply because we don't understand the why

I agree. I am really only referring to events dealing with 9/11 and those people involved with them.

 

[beefcake28]

But throwing a bunch of non-sequitors together and trying to ball it up into one big impossible conspiracy isn't the way to go about it. The only thing that I think bears scrutiny is that I believe that the plane that went down in PA was indeed shot down, the hero story played into the rabble-rousing at the time. I believe a cover-up there is plausible. Otherwise, the rest is not remotely plausible because the sheer number of people involved to keep it quiet.

As far as the twin towers being demo'd how did they get the charges above the damage to begin the cascade from the top?

You know... It is ironic that George Bush's cousin was head of security for the entire WTC complex. If they wanted to pre-plant explosives, it would have been no problem whatsoever.

It is also ironic that GW's cousin's contract for his position as head of security was set to expire the day of 9/11.

What the hell, I'll throw in one more... What abopt NORAD standing down for the first time in 50 years? Why did they stand down? Interestingly enough, they were having a simulation scheduled the morning of 9/11 where they were "preparing" for the possibility that terrorist might fly planes into the twin towers...

Because of this, it's even funnier when you see Condoleeza Rice on the news saying that they could have never imagined terrorists would fly planes into buildings...

If you don't believe any of what I am saying, I will give you links to dozens of newspaper articles and documents, and you can see for yourself. Research it, seriously. I'm not making this shit up. Hell, I'll even post the articles myself if I need to...

 

[beefcake28]

What the hell, I'll throw in one more... What abopt NORAD standing down for the first time in 50 years? Why did they stand down? Interestingly enough, they were having a simulation scheduled the morning of 9/11 where they were "preparing" for the possibility that terrorist might fly planes into the twin towers...

Because of this, it's even funnier when you see Condoleeza Rice on the news saying that they could have never imagined terrorists would fly planes into buildings...

If you don't believe any of what I am saying, I will give you links to dozens of newspaper articles and documents, and you can see for yourself. Research it, seriously. I'm not making this shit up. Hell, I'll even post the articles myself if I need to...

Agency planned drill for plane crash last Sept. 11
Associated Press
August 22, 2002

WASHINGTON -- In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft crashed into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism -- it was to be a simulated accident.
Officials at the Chantilly, Va.-based National Reconnaissance Office had scheduled an exercise that morning in which a small corporate jet crashed into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters building after experiencing a mechanical failure.
The agency is about four miles from the runways of Washington Dulles International Airport.
Agency chiefs came up with the scenario to test employees' ability to respond to a disaster, said spokesman Art Haubold. To simulate the damage from the plane, some stairwells and exits were to be closed off, forcing employees to find other ways to evacuate the building.
"It was just an incredible coincidence that this happened to involve an aircraft crashing into our facility," Haubold said. "As soon as the real world events began, we canceled the exercise."
Terrorism was to play no role in the exercise, which had been planned for several months, he said.
Adding to the coincidence, American Airlines Flight 77 -- the Boeing 767 that was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon -- took off from Dulles at 8:10 a.m. on Sept. 11, 50 minutes before the exercise was to begin. It struck the Pentagon around 9:40 a.m., killing 64 aboard the plane and 125 on the ground.
The National Reconnaissance Office operates many of the nation's spy satellites. It draws its personnel from the military and the CIA.
After the Sept. 11 attacks, most of the 3,000 people who work at agency headquarters were sent home, save for some essential personnel, Haubold said.
An announcement for an upcoming homeland security conference in Chicago first noted the exercise.
In a promotion for speaker John Fulton, a CIA officer assigned as chief of NRO's strategic gaming division, the announcement says, "On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario would come true in a dramatic way that day."
The conference is being run by the National Law Enforcement and Security Institute.

 

[anabolicfreak]

When Rice and Rumsfield said that nobody expected the attack, I think they meant the suicide aspect of the attack.

Up until 9/11 EVERY hijacked airplane had landed safely and I'm sure that the passengers on the planes, like everyone else, never thought the terrorists would kill everyone including themselves.

 

[ass_face]

When Rice and Rumsfield said that nobody expected the attack, I think they meant the suicide aspect of the attack.

Up until 9/11 EVERY hijacked airplane had landed safely and I'm sure that the passengers on the planes, like everyone else, never thought the terrorists would kill everyone including themselves.

Rice knew something... she called Willie Brown and told him not to fly that morning. It is obvious the US was assfucked.

Lady Liberty sleeps on a pile of corpses.

 

[beefcake28]

When Rice and Rumsfield said that nobody expected the attack, I think they meant the suicide aspect of the attack.

Up until 9/11 EVERY hijacked airplane had landed safely and I'm sure that the passengers on the planes, like everyone else, never thought the terrorists would kill everyone including themselves.

They have been running simulations of terrorists running into buildings for years now... numberous "target" buildings like the WTC, pentagon, white house, sears tower, etc. How does flying a plane into a building not imply suicide mission?

 

[beefcake28]

Rice knew something... she called Willie Brown and told him not to fly that morning. It is obvious the US was assfucked.

Lady Liberty sleeps on a pile of corpses.

There were hundreds of people (if not thousands) notified by phone, e-mail, etc... not just a few.