2 weeks cycle ain't as good as 4 or 6 week cycle

[Counterstrike]

I know its been talked about so many times but i was re-reading realgains and another guys opinion on it and yes its good in a sense but its just more shit to deal with. From what I read you will mostly gain is weight but what about those that prefer the strength and bf reduction 2 weeks just doesn't seem enough for either. can one really gain alot in strength in just 2 weeks and plus if you decided to do a short 4-6 week cycle with short esters like Prop or halo or winny etc... to me it seems to better to do it for 4 weeks straight. with the 2 on 4 off its just too much to keep up with and spend more time doing a cycle but I have to admit it is good for people who will cycle for long time this might be a better route and plus gives your body a rest from so many injections but for people that are just going to do 1-3 cycles a year this 2 on and 4 off might be just too long drawn. What are your opinions on this subject?

 

[Athernigy]

I think it depends on the person, I usually don't notice gains even with very fast acting esters until the end of week 2 or begining of week 3 (even with a high frontload). I have frontloaded fina at 3cc/day for a week then went on to 1.5cc for 3more weeks and it still didn't kick in till week 3 or so. Same with dbol, it took till the end of week 2 to kick in. I believe it depends on the person ...

-sk