Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
Sarms
- Thread starter dennis1
- Start date
I read them both , very well written. I understand what each do but not how they differ. Seems they both do almost the same thing. How do they differ. Why choose one over the other.
maccy
New member
Depends on results required...id add lgd to bulking cycles and mk to a triple stack cuttibg...but also mk should be in every pct works wonders
Sent from my GT-I9505 using EliteFitness
They both shut you down (slightly) ?
They both promote muscle and bone growth
They both mimic anabolic effects ( work in a different way )
What are a few differences ?
They both provide the same type of effect on anabolism. Consider LGD the more powerful and suppressive big brother of Ostarine.
PERFECT!!!! Thank You
lgd is going to put on more size but will be a bit more suppressive... not too much but a bit more... mk has more healing properties to it... both prevent muscle wastage... lgd is just a bit stronger but they are similar... as rick said... lgd is just the bigger brother... while sides are minimum anyway, lgd just has a bit more... they are very closely related... you can't go wrong with either... mk is much better for pct usage as lgd would not be recommended... they just have small differences on how to be utilized...
