Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
JuiceIsMyFriend
New member
Why is this guy such a failure?
Obama Supporters Need Not Apply
- Thread starter JuiceIsMyFriend
- Start date
who? you?
I suspect he fails at life in general as well
Stfu and gtfo
WoodyO
New member
The President of The United States respectfully acts you to poast up your credentials.
but the president hasn't even poasted up his own the coward locked them up along with his wife's.
michelle is the only first lady i'd bang though, besides jaclyn kennedy and maybe a younger nance regan
Eleanor Roosevelt gets me all torqued
honest abe's wife wasn't easy on the eyes, i hope he got some quality on the side...
and Bush jr's wife was proly pretty hot in her prime...michele just strikes me as a good fuk...arrogant/elitist/snobby piggy like her is proly super loud and fun.
yea theyre usually all confident in bed and think they are the best lay
WoodyO
New member
He misplaced that shit. The Prez and I used to get high in Maui together. I think he dropped it while picking Mangos off my grandpa's tree.
JuiceIsMyFriend
New member
Umm Michele looks like a downy. Are you a strait male btw?
*straight
or
*str8
and yea i love the tang...michelle can look good imo, sometimes frumpy though.
i like the thick darker ladies always have.
but i despise the womans politics and arrogance
Hahahahaahahahahahahahahah fucking awesome
JuiceIsMyFriend
New member
+1
Shes ripe for a rage fuck
PICK3
New member
JuiceIsMyFriend
New member
She has that lisp when she talks. Def have to paper bag that shit and then paper bag yourself
I was named after Mrs. Reagan... true story...
*paging nangiggles*
I may look like an inanimate object but am very much alive.
-staggering debt
-unwavering high UE
-bond rating downgrade
-solyndra
-shovel ready jobs
-fast and furious
-obamacare
-complete failure to be a political uniter in any sense of the word (recall he ran on this premise)
lotsa reasons to claim O is a failure, pick any one.
I thinks shes cute...except for the no boob thing.
She used to give him head in the car... FREAKY BISH
Last edited:
Filibuster... Silent Filibuster.... Clinton had the same problem. So did Roosevelt, the list goes on.
the HOR is 435 people , The Senate is 100. Lets see you get 535 people to agree when their Leaders say not too.
javaguru
Banned
People give way too much credit and blame when it comes to the POTUS and the economy; I guess it's just human nature to assign blame to one person when things are bad.
The POTUS, congress, and the courts can't manage the economy for best outcomes...the best they can do is not directly harm the economy by trying to run it. The economy represents the plans of everyone....Anyone that wants the government to create jobs wants to live in North Korea.
The POTUS, congress, and the courts can't manage the economy for best outcomes...the best they can do is not directly harm the economy by trying to run it. The economy represents the plans of everyone....Anyone that wants the government to create jobs wants to live in North Korea.
Holy Crap She is HOT.... I Love Mormons.. Does he have 5 of those?
*Fixed
North Korea is Poor and hungry and most of the entire Counrty is DARK from satellite photos. (Since you didnt know)
and Whos the biggest employer in America? The Fucking Government, Not including the Contracts they have with Companies....
Jus' Sayin.
Das a pretty Woman. Packing my Bags and moving to UTAH..
I'd do him for a $1....
Wouldnt tell anyone though...
I'll keep your secret
javaguru
Banned
Thanks for helping to make my point about government run economies....Barry has a North Korea mentality, the government is the best way to solve every problem and he is the person that knows how to solve them all. In his own autobiography, he did write two before the age of fifty which indicates he has a little Kim Jung in him, he claimed to have felt like he was "behind enemy lines" when he took his first job.
Translation : 1: You think he's a Communist - LOL, I call retardation on your part.
2: Google the Depression, and how it was fixed before the war.
And the Government isn't the best way to solve every problem. But it should step in to help when pertinent.
IE: provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.
javaguru
Banned
Little Kim wasn't a communist he was an autocrat and a god to his people via a cult of personality.
The declaration of independence isn't a legally binding document and it's always used by big government progressives to justify everything they want to do. Generally speaking, people that quote it never read the Federalist Papers or studied how the Constitution was cobbled together.
Barry himself has claimed he doesn't like the constitution because it doesn't give affirmative rights like the right to employment...that was in the Soviet Unions Constitution.
The CONSTITUTION IS A LEGALLY BINDING DOCUMENT. and thats what I quoted ya Fucking IDIOT.
Barry Himself has spent his life in Constitutional LAW. So he doesnt agree with some aspects that are perinant to current days. SO the fuck what. IT doesnt mean shit.
I dont Agree with every word in the constitution neither. But MYSELF or POTUS cant change it. and must ahere to it...
Coffeeguru = fail....
javaguru
Banned
You are so uninformed on civics that you're challenging me on this..really...You are not a serious person and the reason the public school system should be abolished for a charter system.
Here you go..the exact words...fucking asshats that don't know the difference between the Constitution and deceleration of independence should not only be barred from voting but also from procreating because they are the stupid and procreate stupid because they don't value education or reading.
Declaration of Independence - Text Transcript
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government."
How did you get to public schools and the declaration?
Focus Coffee. Focius.
javaguru
Banned
You confusing the two most important documents in American history and should have been tested on it. You are the definition of ignorant and stupid...go away and let the adults chat or the educated...your call...
he reminds me of baghdad bob, his Obama world is crashing around him while he claims everything is good and perfect.
bro actually claimed above solyndra and shovel ready jobs were successfull haha!
Obama is even making such claims...i had a reply typed out but obama rabid fans just aren't worth my time anymore
javaguru
Banned
To be fair, I've watched interviews with big government Dem congressmen that cited the Declaration of Independence as their source to justify Barry Care...
We'll see how the Supreme Court rules...
mrplunkey
New member
Cool! What part of "general welfare" lets them get away with stealing 50% of people's stuff? Maybe the bible thumpers think "general welfare" includes no abortions and no gays.
"general welfare" is a complete bullshit clause that libtards use to justify the invasion of people's constitutional rights.
PICK3
New member
mrplunkey
New member
General welfare should include your right to receiving milky white man saline in your pooper as so desired.
I Said
You said
I Said ,
I still havent talked about the Declaration, your still talking about the Declaration for some reason :
Now lets recap for you. I Quoted the Constitution (preamble) ,
You say the Declaration of Independence isn't a legally binding document.
Then I tell you The Constitution IS legally Binding,
You Post a link to the Declaration ???
Then you call me stupid ..... then Bino joins in your stupidity.
LOL, This is so easy...
You said
I Said ,
I still havent talked about the Declaration, your still talking about the Declaration for some reason :
Now lets recap for you. I Quoted the Constitution (preamble) ,
You say the Declaration of Independence isn't a legally binding document.
Then I tell you The Constitution IS legally Binding,
You Post a link to the Declaration ???
Then you call me stupid ..... then Bino joins in your stupidity.
LOL, This is so easy...
Then Plunk squidly comes in and Can Tell the Constitution From the Declaration.
PICK3
New member
wtf???
mrplunkey
New member
Hey retard, don't mix me up in your other meandering bullshit.
You can afford to wander in online circles like that, because you've got that kind of time.
Barry bucks FTMFW!
PICK3
New member
Your fatass posted in the thread. looks like you have plenty of time... AND you post.... Your Fair Game Squidly.
mrplunkey
New member
* you're
PICK3
New member
plunky + .3 / Round brown +7
S
Spartacus
Guest
heh
I'm proud of bama
we look good
not too thug
well spoken
I'm proud of bama
we look good
not too thug
well spoken
S
Spartacus
Guest
it's been over a 1000 days since a team not from alabama won a national championship
OKAY , wheres JAVA with the realization that he changed the subject and began trying to debate me on something totally different from the original.
Maybe he willl post up and thank me for proving his point again. HAHAHAAH
Maybe he willl post up and thank me for proving his point again. HAHAHAAH
PICK3
New member
maybe knot
S
Spartacus
Guest
don't make me feel like a mod
S
Spartacus
Guest
hell I cant recall the number of times I came back and was surprised I wasn't bant
S
Spartacus
Guest
so kiss and make up
S
Spartacus
Guest
fuck that
no fun
hurl insults
make it good too
no fun
hurl insults
make it good too
S
Spartacus
Guest
I can tell I'm almost sober
and possibly a GOP senate...personally a division of powers sounds good to me (o in office with a gop congress), curbs extreme aspirations of either party and forces some compromise.
and while i respect your astute analysis of the current gop pres race, i think you are way off on this statement...2010 midterm elections, coupled with a general distate of obama and his leadership, seem to indicate a strong GOP showing in this election and in the future...
The recent performance of the GOP in the House does not bode well for their long-term job security in my view. And political trends tend to reverse themselves every few years. I don't think the 2010 elections are of any use in predicting the outcome of 2014.
mrplunkey
New member
By the 2014 elections, the Euro will have collapsed and the European recession will be easing off but far from over. The US will be well past $18T in debt -- probably closer to $20T.
The European recession will have splashed on the US it won't be the main cause of the one the US will be simultaneously experiencing (although Washington will blame the entire thing on Europe).
And the airwaves will be filled with talking heads playing Monday morning quarterback saying we should have recognized we were headed toward a Greece-style situation sooner.
And although our tax base will have been severely eroded due to people sheltering and diverting income, we'll still stop the march to insolvency by ravaging social security and medicare (and government benefits).
So see? The story has a happy ending!
agreed, but they will have/or could have an impact in 2012, possibly booting O making him having to deal with a GOP house for two yrs irrelvant.
and the senate is critical in this election for the dems, 22 seats they have to defend against i think 8 for the GOP
mrplunkey
New member
I chortled.
You know that the POTUS is irrelevant if the Whole Congress is One Party though.
That wouldnt be a division of Powers.
Fuck the Current GOP Nomination group.
Buddy Roemer FTW ! ! ! !
veto isn't irrelevant.
and i partially agree with your k message about ending the filibuster, the idea behind it is that it forces moderation to get enough votes to block it.
the threat keeps legislation honest and more centrist...and mitt is a much better statesmen than obama ever could be, def not perfect though...i hope the party coalesce's behind him, for the good of the country
A veto can be overruled, especially if both house and senate are one party.
Mitt is an elitist, he'd be doomed in the general.
unless a lot of broke mofos like you vote him in.
javaguru
Banned
You're using the preamble to bootstrap, ain't legally binding. See, the Supreme Court.
Mitt is most def a elitist, a 1 percenter.
and so is obama...the difference is, Obama tries to mask his elitism thru populism and playing to minorities like he is one of the bros.
and lol at inferring i'm broke and broke voters support mitt...i have a great job and my bank stack is significant at the moment...you and i both know who the brokeass mofos are voting for, ironically the one is partially responsible for a lotta broke'ness (obama)
Article 1 section 8, legally binding...
You Fail.
And im glad your not talking about the Constitution finally.
Java : "I can't believe you are challenging my on this, the Declaration of Independence is not legally binding"
Lololol
DrOiD BioNiC EF App!
javaguru
Banned
The Preamble isn't legally binding; What is your point? What is your point in referencing Article I Section 8? Barry care doesn't impose a tax, it's a penalty based on his own words.
Secondly, let's address your assertion that Barry is a "Constitutional Scholar." To be a scholar one has to contribute to the body of knowledge in your discipline.....Name me a single article published by Barry in a reputable law journal on Con law.
This from a legitimate scholar....and colleague...
javaguru
Banned
I'll save brownbrown from googling him like he googles his counter arguments.
Richard Allen Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Richard Allen Epstein (born April 17, 1943) is the Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law at the New York University School of Law. He is also an Adjunct Scholar at the Cato Institute, the Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution, the James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law Emeritus and a Senior Lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, and a policy advisor for The Heartland Institute. Epstein became a permanent faculty member at NYU School of Law in 2010.[1] Epstein was chosen in a poll as one of the most influential legal thinkers of modern times."
Just sayin BrownBrown...It's interesting to see a legitimate legal scholar give his opinion on Barry, a colleague.
Richard Allen Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Richard Allen Epstein (born April 17, 1943) is the Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law at the New York University School of Law. He is also an Adjunct Scholar at the Cato Institute, the Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution, the James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law Emeritus and a Senior Lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, and a policy advisor for The Heartland Institute. Epstein became a permanent faculty member at NYU School of Law in 2010.[1] Epstein was chosen in a poll as one of the most influential legal thinkers of modern times."
Just sayin BrownBrown...It's interesting to see a legitimate legal scholar give his opinion on Barry, a colleague.
Your definition of Scholar is a Bullshit definition. You picked what you wanted the definition to be and then began arguing your definition validity. WTF? Do you see how obsurd that was?
schol·ar/ˈskälər/
Noun:
- A specialist in a particular branch of study, esp. the humanities; a distinguished academic: "a Hebrew scholar".
- A person who is highly educated or has an aptitude for study.
Now, you are going to argue that thats not a reputable law journal.
Also, To answer your Bullshit definition because its easy,
1990 president of the Harvard Law Review.
1992 - 2004 Barry tought Law at University of Chicago - Thats 12 years of Contributing to the body of Knowledge.........
Similar threads
