Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
W
Warik
Guest
Carter? Lol. Every communist's best friend. The hair on my ass would do better in the White House.
-Warik
-Warik
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
Jimmy Carter has won the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize
- Thread starter BodhiDharma
- Start date
HappyScrappy
New member
Warik said:
you have a hairy ass?
p0ink
New member
A lesson from Jimmy Carter
Source: Washington Times
Published: 5/20/2001
James Earl Carter, the 39th president of the United States, arrived on the national scene in 1976 as a self-righteous, unctuous politician who promised Americans he would never lie to them. A quarter of a century later -- obsessed with the need to rewrite the history of the disastrous roles he played in U.S. economic, foreign and energy policies -- Mr. Carter has reappeared on the op-ed page of The Washington Post as the self-declared energy expert who single-handedly saved the American way of life. In fact, he nearly ruined it.
Audaciously, Mr. Carter implores America to "continue the policies of the late 1970s." In an essay titled "Misinformation and Scare Tactics," he provides a barrage of misinformation and rewritten history in a pitiful effort to bludgeon the proposals offered by the Bush-Cheney administration to address the energy crisis they inherited from the Clinton-Gore administration. Mr. Carter accuses Messrs. Bush and Cheney of making "misleading statements" for the purpose of "distort history and future needs." Well, let´s see who´s distorting what.
Mr. Carter asserts that "oil shortages and an OPEC boycott produced a real energy crisis in the United States" in 1973. The so-called "shortage" was in fact an artificially orchestrated one. OPEC, which was actually formed in 1960, finally was able to wield the immense market (i.e., pricing) power it gradually accumulated as the industrial democracies became ever-more dependent upon the cartel for their oil. Moreover, the boycott was not undertaken by OPEC, as Mr. Carter asserts; rather, it was the brainchild of OAPEC, or the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries, which was peeved at the Untied States for its support of Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur War, which began with a surprise Arab attack upon Israel on the Jewish religion´s holiest day of the year. In any event, because oil is a fungible commodity and OAPEC supplied only 6 percent of U.S. oil consumption, the boycott itself had little or no effect on the United States. The artificially created shortage, however, certainly did.
"Five years later," Mr. Carter writes, "the Iran-Iraq war shut off 4 million barrels of the world´s daily oil supplies almost overnight, and the price of energy more than doubled in just 12 months. This caused a wave of inflation in all industrialized countries and created energy shortages."
For a man who occupied the most powerful office in the world during this period, Mr. Carter does not know what he is talking about. In fact, the Iran-Iraq war did not begin until September 1980, or seven years not five after the 1973 Mideast war. It was the turmoil in Iran, where oil production plummeted in 1978, that caused world oil prices to begin soaring in early 1979. Interestingly, the Iranian turmoil, which eventually led to the shah´s ouster in January 1979, began bubbling shortly after that crafty geostrategist that would be Mr. Carter praised the Shah of Iran as "an island of stability in one of the more troubled areas of the world." Indeed, in October 1978, three months before the shah went down the tubes, the Carter administration concluded that Iran was "not in a revolutionary or pre-revolutionary stage."
Well, Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini returned to Iran on Feb. 1, 1979, and oil prices began to skyrocket. With price controls curtailing the production of U.S. oil reserves, Mr. Carter demanded on Feb. 26 that Congress give him the power to ration gasoline and to close service stations on weekends. This was the reaction from the man who, while wearing a cardigan sweater during a White House speech to the nation in 1977, declared "the moral equivalent of war" or MEOW, as New York Times columnist Russell Baker later observed on the nation´s energy problems. Thus, as gasoline prices soared and lines formed at service stations during the spring of 1979, instead of issuing an executive order decontrolling domestic oil prices, as President Reagan did on his eighth day in office, Mr. Carter concerned himself with the need to tax the "windfall profits" that U.S. oil companies might earn if prices were decontrolled at a later date.
Meanwhile, Mideast oil that sold for less than $13 a barrel in 1978 was fetching $40 by June 1979. Mr. Carter reacted by delivering the worst presidential speech in history the so-called "malaise speech." The commander in chief lectured Americans about their "moral and spiritual crisis," self-righteously bemoaning the fact that "too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption." Less than four months later, Iran seized American hostages, setting off another round of spiraling oil prices.
Still, the most breathtaking statement Mr. Carter made had to be his almost cavalier observation describing today´s energy situation, to wit: "World supplies are adequate and reasonably stable, price fluctuations are cyclical, reserves are plentiful and automobiles aren´t waiting in line at service stations." While that statement precisely describes the situation that confronted Mr. Carter when he praised the shah as "an island of stability," it´s all the more reason why the Bush-Cheney administration must not repeat that loser´s strategy.
Source: Washington Times
Published: 5/20/2001
James Earl Carter, the 39th president of the United States, arrived on the national scene in 1976 as a self-righteous, unctuous politician who promised Americans he would never lie to them. A quarter of a century later -- obsessed with the need to rewrite the history of the disastrous roles he played in U.S. economic, foreign and energy policies -- Mr. Carter has reappeared on the op-ed page of The Washington Post as the self-declared energy expert who single-handedly saved the American way of life. In fact, he nearly ruined it.
Audaciously, Mr. Carter implores America to "continue the policies of the late 1970s." In an essay titled "Misinformation and Scare Tactics," he provides a barrage of misinformation and rewritten history in a pitiful effort to bludgeon the proposals offered by the Bush-Cheney administration to address the energy crisis they inherited from the Clinton-Gore administration. Mr. Carter accuses Messrs. Bush and Cheney of making "misleading statements" for the purpose of "distort history and future needs." Well, let´s see who´s distorting what.
Mr. Carter asserts that "oil shortages and an OPEC boycott produced a real energy crisis in the United States" in 1973. The so-called "shortage" was in fact an artificially orchestrated one. OPEC, which was actually formed in 1960, finally was able to wield the immense market (i.e., pricing) power it gradually accumulated as the industrial democracies became ever-more dependent upon the cartel for their oil. Moreover, the boycott was not undertaken by OPEC, as Mr. Carter asserts; rather, it was the brainchild of OAPEC, or the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries, which was peeved at the Untied States for its support of Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur War, which began with a surprise Arab attack upon Israel on the Jewish religion´s holiest day of the year. In any event, because oil is a fungible commodity and OAPEC supplied only 6 percent of U.S. oil consumption, the boycott itself had little or no effect on the United States. The artificially created shortage, however, certainly did.
"Five years later," Mr. Carter writes, "the Iran-Iraq war shut off 4 million barrels of the world´s daily oil supplies almost overnight, and the price of energy more than doubled in just 12 months. This caused a wave of inflation in all industrialized countries and created energy shortages."
For a man who occupied the most powerful office in the world during this period, Mr. Carter does not know what he is talking about. In fact, the Iran-Iraq war did not begin until September 1980, or seven years not five after the 1973 Mideast war. It was the turmoil in Iran, where oil production plummeted in 1978, that caused world oil prices to begin soaring in early 1979. Interestingly, the Iranian turmoil, which eventually led to the shah´s ouster in January 1979, began bubbling shortly after that crafty geostrategist that would be Mr. Carter praised the Shah of Iran as "an island of stability in one of the more troubled areas of the world." Indeed, in October 1978, three months before the shah went down the tubes, the Carter administration concluded that Iran was "not in a revolutionary or pre-revolutionary stage."
Well, Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini returned to Iran on Feb. 1, 1979, and oil prices began to skyrocket. With price controls curtailing the production of U.S. oil reserves, Mr. Carter demanded on Feb. 26 that Congress give him the power to ration gasoline and to close service stations on weekends. This was the reaction from the man who, while wearing a cardigan sweater during a White House speech to the nation in 1977, declared "the moral equivalent of war" or MEOW, as New York Times columnist Russell Baker later observed on the nation´s energy problems. Thus, as gasoline prices soared and lines formed at service stations during the spring of 1979, instead of issuing an executive order decontrolling domestic oil prices, as President Reagan did on his eighth day in office, Mr. Carter concerned himself with the need to tax the "windfall profits" that U.S. oil companies might earn if prices were decontrolled at a later date.
Meanwhile, Mideast oil that sold for less than $13 a barrel in 1978 was fetching $40 by June 1979. Mr. Carter reacted by delivering the worst presidential speech in history the so-called "malaise speech." The commander in chief lectured Americans about their "moral and spiritual crisis," self-righteously bemoaning the fact that "too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption." Less than four months later, Iran seized American hostages, setting off another round of spiraling oil prices.
Still, the most breathtaking statement Mr. Carter made had to be his almost cavalier observation describing today´s energy situation, to wit: "World supplies are adequate and reasonably stable, price fluctuations are cyclical, reserves are plentiful and automobiles aren´t waiting in line at service stations." While that statement precisely describes the situation that confronted Mr. Carter when he praised the shah as "an island of stability," it´s all the more reason why the Bush-Cheney administration must not repeat that loser´s strategy.
W
Warik
Guest
HappyScrappy said:
What kind of man doesn't have a hairy ass? I couldn't trust a man who didn't have a hairy ass... that's like, womanly and stuff.
-Warik
Doktor Bollix
New member
You know the way politicians are trying to get elected they say they are political outsiders, not part of the Washington elite, represent the people beyond the Beltway? Jimmy Carter really was all those things and so he couldn't get a damn thing done.
Longhorn85
New member
Carter is deserving, but his recent criticisms of George W. Bush were seen by many as petty, ill-timed and partisan.
Who is John Galt?
New member
http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=3800
Dishonoring America and Peace
By Steven Plaut
FrontPageMagazine.com | October 11, 2002
In an era when Yassir Arafat and Shimon Peres hold Nobel Peace Prizes, I suppose none of us should find it too surprising that Jimmy Carter gets awarded one.
Jimmy Carter, Mister Peanut from Plains Georgia, was without a doubt the worst American President in the post-World War II era, and possibly the very worst President ever. True, Clinton would be a major contender, but Clinton will be remembered for his sneaky sleaze, underhandedness, and sly dishonesty, whereas Carter will be remembered for his disgracing America, for his appeasement and defeatism, for his anti-Americanism, for his cowardice and pandering to terrorists, and most of all for his overwhelming stupidity.
Carter was without a doubt awarded the Prize as a slap at the Bush Administration. The Scandinavian leftists who award the Prize do not like Americans who believe in using armed force against Islamist fascism or in defending America, and their very best role model for coddling Islamist terror and fascism and for American self-abasement is Jimmy Carter. Goobers Carter took America to its all-time security low. He groveled before the Iranians who held American hostages. He disarmed America. He brought the American economy to a ruin. He produced the highest inflation rate since the Civil War, a fact that no doubt endeared him to the Scandinavian socialists of the Nobel Committee, and a high unemployment rate. And he led the campaign to appease the Soviet Union, insisting communism was here to stay, all this eight years before it utterly collapsed.
But more than anything else, Carter will be remembered for his bashing Israel. He is the one whose affirmative action appointee to the UN, Andrew Young, launched the jihad for Palestinian statehood in the American foreign-policy establishment. He sucked up to Jesse Jackson. He led the campaign to dismember Israel and reward PLO terror. He spent his years since getting kicked out of the White House in one of America's greatest election landslides lobbying the world on behalf of the PLO, campaigning for sanctions against Israel, and of course for Israel's Oslo national suicide. So I suppose he has everything it takes today to be a Nobel Prize winner.
Carter was the symbol of appeasement, stupidity, detachment for reality, weakness, and timidity. So in all of this he will share his prize well with Rabin and Peres.
Carter's stupidity is still a matter of bitter humor. We recall his infantile attempt to be an Alpha male and talk about his lusting after women, a matter which led to that famous cartoon of him gazing at the Statue of Liberty and imagining her naked. This was the peanut-brain from Plains, the dumber brother of Billy Carter.
So who really does deserve a Nobel Peace Prize?
Answer: The greatest living American President. The man who undid Carter's appeasements and coddling of Islamist terror. The man who put fear into the hearts of America-haters. The man who believed in using force to block communism, who fearlessly labeled communism the Empire of Evil. The President under whose administration the growth in the US economy was larger than the size of the entire economy of Germany. The man who restored American self-respect. The man responsible for the end of the Cold War. The President hated by Scandinavian appeasers and Eurocowards: Ronald Reagan.
Dishonoring America and Peace
By Steven Plaut
FrontPageMagazine.com | October 11, 2002
In an era when Yassir Arafat and Shimon Peres hold Nobel Peace Prizes, I suppose none of us should find it too surprising that Jimmy Carter gets awarded one.
Jimmy Carter, Mister Peanut from Plains Georgia, was without a doubt the worst American President in the post-World War II era, and possibly the very worst President ever. True, Clinton would be a major contender, but Clinton will be remembered for his sneaky sleaze, underhandedness, and sly dishonesty, whereas Carter will be remembered for his disgracing America, for his appeasement and defeatism, for his anti-Americanism, for his cowardice and pandering to terrorists, and most of all for his overwhelming stupidity.
Carter was without a doubt awarded the Prize as a slap at the Bush Administration. The Scandinavian leftists who award the Prize do not like Americans who believe in using armed force against Islamist fascism or in defending America, and their very best role model for coddling Islamist terror and fascism and for American self-abasement is Jimmy Carter. Goobers Carter took America to its all-time security low. He groveled before the Iranians who held American hostages. He disarmed America. He brought the American economy to a ruin. He produced the highest inflation rate since the Civil War, a fact that no doubt endeared him to the Scandinavian socialists of the Nobel Committee, and a high unemployment rate. And he led the campaign to appease the Soviet Union, insisting communism was here to stay, all this eight years before it utterly collapsed.
But more than anything else, Carter will be remembered for his bashing Israel. He is the one whose affirmative action appointee to the UN, Andrew Young, launched the jihad for Palestinian statehood in the American foreign-policy establishment. He sucked up to Jesse Jackson. He led the campaign to dismember Israel and reward PLO terror. He spent his years since getting kicked out of the White House in one of America's greatest election landslides lobbying the world on behalf of the PLO, campaigning for sanctions against Israel, and of course for Israel's Oslo national suicide. So I suppose he has everything it takes today to be a Nobel Prize winner.
Carter was the symbol of appeasement, stupidity, detachment for reality, weakness, and timidity. So in all of this he will share his prize well with Rabin and Peres.
Carter's stupidity is still a matter of bitter humor. We recall his infantile attempt to be an Alpha male and talk about his lusting after women, a matter which led to that famous cartoon of him gazing at the Statue of Liberty and imagining her naked. This was the peanut-brain from Plains, the dumber brother of Billy Carter.
So who really does deserve a Nobel Peace Prize?
Answer: The greatest living American President. The man who undid Carter's appeasements and coddling of Islamist terror. The man who put fear into the hearts of America-haters. The man who believed in using force to block communism, who fearlessly labeled communism the Empire of Evil. The President under whose administration the growth in the US economy was larger than the size of the entire economy of Germany. The man who restored American self-respect. The man responsible for the end of the Cold War. The President hated by Scandinavian appeasers and Eurocowards: Ronald Reagan.
Jimsbbc
New member
Who is John Galt? said:
I couldn't agree more with this article. LMFAO, Jimmy Carter was the biggest fuck up President besides Billy Blowjob Clinton. Democrats do nothing but fuck things up. It's a good thing we had the foundation of the Reagan years in place to hold us up through the Clinton scandals.
Similar threads
