|
|
 |
 |
|
 Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
 Chat & Conversation
 Chumura will be found NOT GUILTY
|
| Author | Topic: Chumura will be found NOT GUILTY | ||
|
Freak 
Posts: 1602 |
If anyone has been following the case, you will have noticed that the Prosecution has been SUCKING ASS in trying to convict him. 1. The accuser couldn't remember shit when she was on the stand, and usually when someone is raped, they remember MOST OF EVERYTHING. 2. The accuser said she could not re-enact the rape in the model bathroom in court because she said it was "no where close to the actual size of the bathroom" well, the truth was that it was the EXACT size of the bathroom.
4. The doctor who examined the accuser after the "rape" said that he could not conclude if she had been raped, usually it is easy to tell, but he claimed that the marks were so insignificant that they could have been left by a wet bathing suit
All they have on Chumura is comments he made to the girl, like referring to her as "jailbait", well, you can't convict on bullshit like that. ------------------     | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder 
Posts: 1065 |
I heard some what she had to say. She sounded like a really stupid bitch. She said she didn't know how her legs ended open. He will be found not guilty and rightfully so. ------------------ | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder 
Posts: 285 |
good old Chewy sounds like hell be ok, but there is one small thing, guilty or not, its like Ray Lewis a year ago at that Super Bowl party where the two guys were killed--shouldnt have been in that situation cause you can get dragged down by the actions of others if you dont think things through | ||
|
Freak
Posts: 1602 |
I hear jokes all the time about Lewis being a killer, yet If you watched that case, you would know that he DID NOTHING, he was just there. I'm sure the same will go for Chamura, he will be not guilty, but will probably still be thought up as a rapist. Sad but true. ------------------ | ||
|
Moderator 
Posts: 2496 |
Naty, Just because the prosecution sucks, doesn't mean he didn't do it. Or would you claim that OJ was really innocent? I don't really care one way or the other. But I saw how the defense questioned the alleged victim - and going after her too aggressively could backfire. These jurors have emotions, and may have duaghters. Either way, fuck both of them. what about Puffy and Shyne? cellmates? | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder
Posts: 1448 |
Matt, are you trying to say--from the evidence presented at the TRIAL, not on CNN and Geraldo--that you would have convicted O.J. if you were on that jury, in the CRIMINAL trial??? Please tell me the media didn't jade you thaaaat much!! After reading the books of every lawyer involved in the trial, including prosecution AND defense, and ol' Bugliosi's racist excuse for an objective novel, I have to say that I--had I been on that jury--would have voted NOT GUILTY 'til the cows came home! Now, as far as the Civil trial goes, I was not able to watch enough of it (due to it not being televised, etc.) to make a rational, educated decision! The fact is, the only info we CAN use to commit someone of a crime is that presented at the trial...that is the American way, and that's the reason we have the fairest (I know I'll get sh*t for that comment) in the world today!! I think that any of us--if ever accused of a serious crime--would want to be tried in American over any other country on the planet... Just my 2 cents, let me know what you think... ------------------ | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder
Posts: 934 |
The girls name is Allison and she was 17. My name is Allison and I'm 17. I live in Wisconsin, about 45 minutes from the girl. He came into the restaurant I work at about 3 months ago. Just thought I'd share.  ------------------ | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder
Posts: 692 |
I've watched it some on court tv..The girls answers are a bit conflicting. She will remember saying something to the cops, but not remember when it was said or to who. The defense lawyer asked her didn't you say such and such to such and such at such and such time, and she answered yes...Then he stopped looked up at her and said Geeze it isn't here on the transcript here from the cops. She doesn't have anything solid to say. In my humble opinion she hasn't offered anything to make me believe that this might have even happened Not that I'm a fan of this guys, just a bored guy watching court tv... | ||
|
Freak
Posts: 1602 |
Matt, even friends of the girl are doubting that she is telling the truth, a mother of another girl testified that when the saw the accuser the very next morning, she acted normal, didn't looked distressed at all, and appeared to be in a good mood. Before watching the case, I thought Chamura was some scumbag rapist, but after hearing the girl give a snide remark to every question, I think she is the scumbag, and I'm betting the jury feels the same way. She got soooo defensive to every simple question that was asked, and would always scream something like "I DON'T KNOW BECAUSE HE RAPED ME!!!" but regardless of whether he did it or not, I haven't seen ANY evidence that would convict him. She can accuse all she wants, but thats not enough. And I thought the prosecution in the OJ case presented a shitload of hard evidience, but thats just from watching CNN highlights, maybe Badskins is right. ------------------ | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder
Posts: 1448 |
Naty, almost EVERY single piece of "hard evidence" that Marsha Clark and Chris "the dumbASS" Darden presented was 'milky.' For every picture of say, a glove, that was on O.J.'s floor at one time, there was another of it NOT BEING THERE...as far as the blood goes--I won't even get into all that--it's interesting how the amount found in/on O.J.'s car was the exact amount MISSING from the vial that they took from him...HMM... This isn't really to stir up old news, just to show that you can't judge a trial by what the Clinton News Network tells you, or biased, racist, fame-hating (which is in itself contradictory since they are famous in a sense) commentators like Mr. Rivera... In America, we can only judge on evidence presented in court!! Like I said above already... ------------------ | ||
|
Moderator
Posts: 2496 |
Naty, I haven't been watching the Chmura trial. Like I said, I don't care one way or the other. Whatever is justice, may it be served. Badkins, It's been almost 7 years on the OJ deal. My memory is fuzzy. But - no other leads, incoherent alibi/time missing, thepresence footprints (from the Bruno Magli shoes), the blood from Nicole in the Bronco, and the charade with the gloves...(he was wearing a glove underneath it and didn;t take his arthritis medication. Not only that, but there were several prior complaints of domestic violence against him by Nicole, and there have been some by his subsequent girlfriends. Oh...and the that little fact that he tried to run away...the infamous chase. Yeah, OJ was guilty as shit. The media didn't convince me of that. OJs actions and the evidence did. [This message has been edited by MattTheSkywalker (edited February 01, 2001).] |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c
posted January 31, 2001 11:48 PM
