GEORGE SPELLWIN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Enlightening Men about Anabolic Steroids and Bodybuilding for over Two Decades
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! |
 George Spellwin's ELITE FITNESS Discussion Boards
 Anabolic Discussion Board
 Sust vs. Primoteston
|
| Author | Topic: Sust vs. Primoteston |
|
BIGBADLB Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 3) |
posted July 22, 2000 05:00 PM
 
Which one does everyone prefer? I've never used sust, only t200, but have access to primotest and sust.......I'm going for the "big and hard" look so I want water, and other sides kept to a bare minimum (will stack with deca, primo, or winstrol).....btw I have arimidex.....alright let's hear it IP: Logged |
|
adamsandlr Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 103) |
posted July 22, 2000 05:32 PM
well you well have alot less water retention and less estrogenic sides using sust 250 primotesten is brutal for water retention and gyno IP: Logged |
|
adamsandlr Pro Bodybuilder (Total posts: 103) |
posted July 22, 2000 05:34 PM
test's seem to make me sick so hopefully you won't have that problem IP: Logged |
|
THE APE Amateur Bodybuilder (Total posts: 18) |
posted July 22, 2000 05:42 PM
FOR HARDNESS SUST IS THE BETTER OF THE TWO.HOWEVER YOUR ARIMIDEX WILL WIPE OUT WATER RETENTION ON JUST ABOUT ANYTHING(EXCEPT DECA & ANADROL:PROGESTIN).USE ARIMIDEX AT 1/2 TO 1MG DAILY AND YOU WILL BE HARD AS NAILS ON EITHER COMPOUND. IP: Logged |
All times are ET (US) | |
 |
|
|