

|
Elite Fitness Bodybuilding, Anabolics, Diet, Life Extension, Wellness, Supplements, and Training Boards
![]() Anabolic Discussion Board
![]() T-200? How effective?
|
| Author | Topic: T-200? How effective? | ||
|
Novice
Posts: 3 |
I am relatively new to the "art" of choosing what steroid works best and am curious about test-200. I have been on a few bulk cycles, each centered around test-200 and have made good gains but I want to know if it is really that good or if I should look elsewhere? ------------------ ![]() | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder ![]() ![]()
Posts: 355 |
I got better results with sus then T-200. I ran the sus at 500mg a week and the T-200 at 600mg a week. Both with decca. The sus yielded much better results for me. ![]() | ||
|
Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Posts: 5289 |
Hey Fozy which cycle did you do first? ------------------ For a good time click here: Search and Profiles (300Kleens Board) ![]() | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder ![]() ![]()
Posts: 658 |
Enanthate works much better than Sus for me. To Each His Own! ------------------ ![]() | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder ![]() ![]()
Posts: 355 |
good call......I should have taken that into account I did the sus first...........w/ 300mg Decca Things I noticed between the two 1.I held MUCH more water on the T-200. 2.after everything was all said and done I kept much more gains when I used the sus. 3.All thfee of the bottles were underfilled.( It was Brovel) Thats the most noticible differences I can think of.
Cyce 1 sus / decca 171LBs ---------193 week 8------eventually leveled off at 185
185------------200 week 8 This was back in october Currently weighing in at 190...dropped a good amount of fat from eating to much on the last cycle. so all in all I kept about 14LBS on first
hope this answers you slopian
![]() | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder ![]() ![]()
Posts: 869 |
only test i have used is sustanon, and i didnt like it at all... my body did not respond well what so ever! everyone! i know personally uses t-200 and recieves great gains! go with the t-200, just my opinion -MiKe001- ------------------ ![]() | ||
|
Cool Novice ![]()
Posts: 25 |
I am using t-200 right now and making great gains with no gyno. This is my first cycle and I'm only using 200mg a week with 200mg of laurabolin. NO other test matches sust though, because at the begginning of my cycle I took 500mg for two weeks and gained 14 pounds. GO WITH THE SUSTANON. Try the ttokkyo brand and tell me how it is. ![]() | ||
|
Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Posts: 5289 |
hehe Foz knew where I was going. I personally don't like sus. I prefer enanthate - but recieve the same amount of sides, bloat, water, and gains from each. I know this is more mental with most people - but trully i doubt there is any noticable difference EVERYTHING ELSE HELD CONSTANT. I would use the brovel buddy, the Tornell is the same price or cheaper and is of higher quality. ------------------ For a good time click here: Search and Profiles (300Kleens Board) ![]() | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder ![]()
Posts: 159 |
I've used both with great results. I would look at the price of each and let it dictate which you choose. People love to bad mouth T200, but I gain just as well off it as I do off Sus. ![]() | ||
|
Pro Bodybuilder ![]() ![]()
Posts: 408 |
Brovel t200 is shit! I'd only use Tornel ------------------ ![]() | ||
|
Novice
Posts: 1 |
I like t-200 better than sust. ![]() | ||
|
Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Posts: 1799 |
I love it and make great gains with it. ![]() | ||
|
Elite Bodybuilder ![]() ![]()
Posts: 1388 |
I know I've said this many times in the past, but distiguish between Brovel or Tornel. They are NOT the same company, and their products are of vastly different quality! Brovel = Crap There. I feel better. ------------------ ![]() | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder ![]()
Posts: 173 |
always worked great for me... ![]() | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder ![]()
Posts: 51 |
hey rookie. ive tried t200 a couple times and omna once, noticed no difference in the 2. do a search before you ask these same old questions. j/k traps (sky) ![]() | ||
|
Amateur Bodybuilder ![]()
Posts: 152 |
test is test. As long as they are both dosed correctly (T-200 is notorious for being dosed from 133mg/ml-150mg/ml) then any test should produce similar effects for a similar amount used. I notice less water retention and a sharper peak with propionate vs enathate but they both work great. Sust is a great product but there is nothing magical about it and it has a long half life which is a disadvantage for shorter cycles, but I still use it as well. ![]() |
All times are ET (US) | |
|