Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

WTC sculpture - a new low in taste and decorum?

mekannik

New member
http://nypost.com/commentary/57305.htm

(w/picture)

September 18, 2002 --

IS THIS art? Or assault?

As grieving New Yorkers marked the anniversary of the World Trade Center's destruction, the folks at Rockefeller Center got in your face to commemorate the terror attacks.

A violently disturbing sculpture popped up last week in the middle of Rock Center's busy underground concourse - right in front of the ice-skating rink. It depicts a naked woman, limbs flailing, face contorted, at the exact moment her head smacks pavement following her leap from the flaming World Trade Center.

The worst part about the piece is that you can't miss it. Even if you try.

Titled "Tumbling Woman," the sculpture is by '80s darling Eric Fischl.

Since it's planted in one of the city's best-traveled locations, tourists, stroller-pushing moms and office workers - many of whom lost friends and colleagues in the trade-center atrocity - are confronted daily with a larger-than-life rendition of a grotesque episode.

"It's disgusting!" said Ken Fidje, 34, who was poring over paperwork at a table facing the sculpture yesterday when he looked up and noticed it.

"I used to work at the trade center, and I know a lot of people who worked at Cantor Fitzgerald [which lost more than 600 workers]. "It's awful. It's awful!"

Images of desperate people leaping to their deaths last Sept. 11 were captured by news photographers and seared into the memories of trade-center survivors. But out of respect to families of the dead, the most brutal still and video images are rarely displayed publicly - and then, only after sensitive viewers are warned that they may want to look away.

No such warning is found anywhere near the sculpture. There is a plaque featuring a Fischl-authored poem that reads, in part:

"We watched,

disbelieving and helpless,

on that savage day.

People we love

began falling,

helpless and in disbelief."

Fischl - who was traveling in Croatia yesterday - was not in Manhattan, but way out in the Hamptons Sept. 11 last year, and, despite the moronic poem, he did not witness the scene his work exploits.

But one Rock Center security guard, forced to endure the sculpture because of his job, said he felt as if he were being dragged against his will back to the terrible day when he actually watched human beings fall from the sky.

"I saw 70 people fall from the tower," he said. "Fall from almost 100 stories! To see a statue of people falling to the ground - it's nothing to be happy about."

He said he was considering filing a complaint.

"You have to respect other people and what trauma this will impose upon them," said Michael Cartier, who co-founded the Give Your Voice victims'-advocacy group after losing his brother, James.

The sculpture is on display through Monday. Steven Rubenstein, a spokesman for Rockefeller Center, said the work was not commissioned.
_________________________________________

So let's hear it. People condemned Rotten.com for posting pics of the actual event with "questionable" titles of the photographs. But here we have an artist's rendition. Shall we start destroying art and hanging the artist to appease some people?
 
Eric Fischl is one of my favorite contemporary artists. I had no idea this sculpture is one of his works, I know him as a painter. That could be one of the reasons why I like this particular work.

The halmark of good art is it's ability to arouse an emotional response from the viewer. Think Picasso's Guernica (sp?).
 
I watched cnn last night for a lil bit and the sculpture didn't look offensive.
 
I read the entire article, but I don't see the WTC in that picture, besides the bad poem and such, how is this really related to the WTC? Are there any photos of people impacting the sidewalk that look like this? I was unaware the people who jumped were naked.

My point is, sure this is tactless, but how is this related to the WTC?

If I did a sculpture of someones sad face ,and after 9/11 decided it was "Sad person looking at WTC" would it really be related to the WTC? Is it like Elton John changing the lyrics of 'candle in the wind' to fit in with modern events?
 
Just curious how a website (Rotten.com) posts actual pics the disaster and everyone and their bastardized uncle wants the site hacked or taken down.


Now you have an artist stirring up emotions (not all of them pleasant or sentimental) and you again have people crying foul.

And back here on EF - the mass' tolerance level has seems to have risen. Curious.


Could it be EF is growing more tolerant with age?
 
They took it down due to complaints.
 
Should we Close down the Holocaust Museums ?
It is called FALLING WOMAN not Fallen Woman referencing the hitting the sidewalk comment.

The concrete is called a Stand for the piece...
 
Hengst said:

The halmark of good art is it's ability to arouse an emotional response from the viewer.

evoking emotional response is one thing, sensationalism and deliberate provoking of wounded people is another.

taking a dump in the middle of a crowded shopping mall will arouse a lot of people emotionally. that doesn't make it 'good art'

(but given the garbage touted as 'contemporary art,' I am sure some would disagree with that...)
 
I think it was in very poor taste. The commercialization of the WTC event seems crass to me. We should wait several years before reminding everybody. It still seems like it happened a few weeks ago.
 
Top Bottom