Would you fight for a different administration???

[Testosterone boy]

Some folks who were not lusting after the welfare of the rich?

Some folks who didn't think it was fine that almost half of our prison population was incarcerated for minor drug infractions?

Some folks who did not believe that war is more godly than welfare?

Some folks who did not teach us that the extreme vanity of gung-ho captalistas is all that is required to sail off of the edge of the world?

Some folks who taught us that losing 3000 people is tragic but it happens every week and life needs to continue?

Some folks who served the public interest rather than the golden coffers of the Corporate Economy?



Many of us were quite fond of the ride called America. It is the wreckless drivers of our ride that has us seething with rage. Get us some morally driven new drivers and we will again cherish our national vehicle.

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

I want to fight for soccermommy-loving assholes who throw money at people who produce nothing.

Incentives for the biggest producers IS the way to solve the other problems.

 

[Testosterone boy]

I want to fight for soccermommy-loving assholes who throw money at people who produce nothing.

Incentives for the biggest producers IS the way to solve the other problems.

Yea.........it is working out great isn't it?

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

Yea.........it is working out great isn't it?

These half measures suck, I totally agree.

Real reform toward a real free market is my answer.

 

[Testosterone boy]

These half measures suck, I totally agree.

Real reform toward a real free market is my answer.

Tort reform is #1 by my book.

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

Tort reform is #1 by my book.

Well, believe me when I tell you, this admin is not blocking that.....

Tax reform is my #1...torts #2.

 

[manny78]

Actually the libertarians are probably the closest to your goals.

 

[Testosterone boy]

Well, believe me when I tell you, this admin is not blocking that.....

Tax reform is my #1...torts #2.

They have not blocked anything.............not one spending measure has been vetoed. A prelude to bankruptcy if the trend continues.

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

They have not blocked anything.............not one spending measure has been vetoed. A prelude to bankruptcy if the trend continues.

tort reform is not a spending issue. Trial lawyers are the Democrats' biggest donors.

It would be hard to blame the bushbarians for the tort situation.

Don;t worry about bankruptcy - America will do what it always does - take from the rich - the worst economic policy there is.

 

[Testosterone boy]

Actually the libertarians are probably the closest to your goals.

They could become viable if the internet becomes 4 times more popular.

 

[BO-DEN]

im soo tierd of the way things are.

we are in for a very sucky 4 years

 

[Testosterone boy]

Incentives for the biggest producers IS the way to solve the other problems. [/B]

The rich know how to make money. They do not need incentives. The accumulation of financial power is not their gift, it is their overwhelming need.....their vision of a spiritual reward. Their self image is directly attached to their gains and most know how to stay rich. They are adept at taking care of themselves in any society whether it be socialist, chaos, or a banana republic. They will prosper with or without a large government presence.

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

The rich know how to make money. They do not need incentives. The accumulation of financial power is not their gift, it is their overwhelming need.....their vision of a spiritual reward. Their self image is directly attached to their gains and most know how to stay rich. They are adept at taking care of themselves in any society whether it be socialist, chaos, or a banana republic. They will prosper with or without a large government presence.

This is nonsense.

 

[mordy]

Testosterone boy is pretty right. There will always be powerful rich. Though, theres no harm in having a cleansing every once in a while. Our democracy was built to help reduce the need to do so. But, nothings perfect.

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

Testosterone boy is pretty right. There will always be powerful rich. Though, theres no harm in having a cleansing every once in a while. Our democracy was built to help reduce the need to do so. But, nothings perfect.

the free market is how you allow wealth to be distributed.

WTF is a cleansing?

 

[mordy]

the free market is how you allow wealth to be distributed.

WTF is a cleansing?

well, civil war, uprisings, revolts, revolutions. Not always good, not always bad. I'm not saying we NEED to, but its a reminder to those in power that true power can be taken away by the people.

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

well, civil war, uprisings, revolts, revolutions. Not always good, not always bad. I'm not saying we NEED to, but its a reminder to those in power that true power can be taken away by the people.

true....but these things almost always occur because people lack the foresight to make changes through more "democratic" means.

 

[IhateOsama]

I don't know how I could. With this administration I get some Bush, Dick and Colin with a little Rice. What's Dean gonna give me other than a short white dude playing master of the house.

 

[DrDillio]

Asshole genocide is my number one solution to all problems in America. Although haha that might leave America with a little short of a population

 

[MattTheSkywalker]

Asshole genocide is my number one solution to all problems in America. Although haha that might leave America with a little short of a population

gonna shoot yourself?




(too easy bro)

 

[IhateOsama]

Asshole genocide is my number one solution to all problems in America. Although haha that might leave America with a little short of a population

They should start with that boddhavista or whatever dude. What an Asshole.

 

[Tiervexx]

matt, check your PM

 

[Testosterone boy]

matt, check your PM

Where the hell have you been?

 

[Tiervexx]

They could become viable if the internet becomes 4 times more popular.

They are growing really fast... If they get a good leader 20 years from now they could become viable, or at least big enough to force republicans to get serious about tax reform and back down on social restrictions.

 

[atlantabiolab]

Some folks who were not lusting after the welfare of the rich?

If they were "lusting after the welfare of the rich" ONLY, then yes, another administration would be required. If the administration were, on the other hand, removing regulatory and punitive obstacles, targeting individuals, because they ARE rich, then no, this would not be a point of contention.

Some folks who didn't think it was fine that almost half of our prison population was incarcerated for minor drug infractions?

Yes.

Some folks who did believe that war is more godly than welfare?

I am sure you meant "did NOT believe". Neither side would be a good choice. Both can employ despotic tactics to obtain their goal: social engineering or imperialism.

A better administration would be one which understood that "welfare" is the responsibility of individuals and not agencies and that warfare is for protecting vested interests.

Some folks who did not teach us that the extreme vanity of gung-ho captalistas is all that is required to sail off of the edge of the world?

No idea what this means.

Some folks who taught us that losing 3000 people is tragic but it happens every week and life needs to continue?

These people would be called idiots. Telling the nation that the targeted destruction of thousands of citizens is "common occurances" is ludicrous. When such an event occurs reason must prevail, not emotionalism or shoving our head further in the sand. Strong actions are not innately wrong.

Some folks who served the public interest rather than the golden coffers of the Corporate Economy?

Neither. Administrations must serve the rule of LAW, not men. Your idea is populism which is nothing more than generic socialism.

 

[Testosterone boy]

Re: Re: Would you fight for a different administration???

If they were "lusting after the welfare of the rich" ONLY, then yes, another administration would be required. If the administration were, on the other hand, removing regulatory and punitive obstacles, targeting individuals, because they ARE rich, then no, this would not be a point of contention.



Yes.



I am sure you meant "did NOT believe". Neither side would be a good choice. Both can employ despotic tactics to obtain their goal: social engineering or imperialism.

A better administration would be one which understood that "welfare" is the responsibility of individuals and not agencies and that warfare is for protecting vested interests.



No idea what this means.



These people would be called idiots. Telling the nation that the targeted destruction of thousands of citizens is "common occurances" is ludicrous. When such an event occurs reason must prevail, not emotionalism or shoving our head further in the sand. Strong actions are not innately wrong.



Neither. Administrations must serve the rule of LAW, not men. Your idea is populism which is nothing more than generic socialism.

I don't know how to slice up quotes, that is why I don't usually respond to sliced up replies.

 

[Testosterone boy]

.

 

[GodOfThunder]

Karma to you, I agree 100%.

well, civil war, uprisings, revolts, revolutions. Not always good, not always bad. I'm not saying we NEED to, but its a reminder to those in power that true power can be taken away by the people.

 

[Yarg!]

dude, noone fights for a fucking administration. people fight for ideologies.