Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

why clomid on-cycle isn't entirely useless

Keep it beefy

New member
though it may not be highly effective, it may still have some effect, and this is my reasoning.

there are several feedback mechanisms that control testosterone production in the human body. two of the most important are the estrogenic and testosterone routes.

the first being the estrogenic one. most people know about this. this is why people take clomid postcycle. clomid is a selective estrogen receptor modulator, and binds in the hypothalamus to prevent the brain from thinking there is any estrogen in the blood. the hypo. reacts by releasing GNRH, which tells the pituitary to release LH and FSH.

the testosterone negative feedback route occurs through inhibin. which is released from the testes and acts on the hypothalamus to regulate testosterone the same way the above feedback route did. considering both of these, you can see that doing clomid on-cycle isn't entirely pointless. when you take clomid in the presence of supraphysiological levels of testosterone (or it's derivatives, some haveing more pronouced effects on inhibin than others, and affecting other feedback routes, though that's a different thread), the hypothalamus thinks it's not getting estrogen, which would normally cause for an increase in LH production. but because inhibin levels are high (because the testes see that there is tons of test. floating around), the feedback via the estrogenic route is less effective, BUT STILL EFFECTIVE TO AN EXTENT. studies have shown that in healthy men, clomid alone will raise testosterone levels up to 57% (i don't have the abstract on me, someone else may). the endocrine system is extremely multifaceted, and is not an on or off thing. when both negative feedback systems are in full effect, as is the case on cycle most of the time, you shut yourself down from two separate pathways. if you knock out one of those pathways (i.e. with clomid oncycle), LH levels will increase.
 
Sure, clomid may have some effect... but why take it when you can get Nolva???

C-ditty
 
nolva is a serm correct? does it exhibit estrogen antagonizing effects in the hypothalamus? i've never heard of it to do so, but i could be wrong. either way, it isn't as powerful as clomid. do you do nolva for post cycle therapy? how does it work for you in comparison to clomid?

-beef
 
Keep it beefy said:
nolva is a serm correct? does it exhibit estrogen antagonizing effects in the hypothalamus? i've never heard of it to do so, but i could be wrong. either way, it isn't as powerful as clomid. do you do nolva for post cycle therapy? how does it work for you in comparison to clomid?

-beef

Here are my thoughts on it...

Clomid doesn't necessiarly spike the hypo and pitu to get back to regularity after a cycle. Rather, it it inhibits the estrogen receptors so that the hypo and pitu will begin to function normally again... Nolva does this as well... and it blocks the receptors more effectively (IMO). Also, clomid can lead to emotional side-effects as well as some acne (depending on the brand).

It just seems to me better to use Nolva... although, clomid would accomplish the same thing post-cycle... I just prefer Nolva... as I feel it does the same job.

C-ditty
 
Androgens act directly on hypothalamus and actually lower inhibin which is a regulator of FSH secretion.
When Clomid is used in presence of normal levels of androgen it will cause an increase in LH, FSH and inhibin because inhibin regulates FSH via negative feedback loop.
It will have no effect on it while on cycle since high levels of androgen will act directly on hypothalamus and prevent an increase of LH.



from:
http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/full/84/5/1664?ijkey=q8gtURoXMQy1g

INHIBINS are gonadal glycoproteins that play an important role in the biological feedback system of FSH release from the pituitary gland. Recently, a negative relationship between circulating inhibin B and FSH in normal adult males has been demonstrated (2, 3).



Inhibin levels are not increased on cycle, it's actually suppressed.


Physiological relationships between inhibin B, follicle stimulating hormone secretion and spermatogenesis in normal men and response to gonadotrophin suppression by exogenous testosterone
RA Anderson, EM Wallace, NP Groome, AJ Bellis and FC Wu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Inhibin has been postulated to be secreted by Sertoli cells in response to follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and in turn to exert an inhibitory effect on FSH production. We have investigated this relationship using an assay specific for dimeric inhibin B. A total of 56 normal men received 200 mg testosterone enanthate (TE) i.m. weekly, for 65 +/- 1 weeks in a trial of hormonal male contraception. Before treatment a significant negative correlation between inhibin B and FSH concentration (r = 0.49, P < 0.001) was observed. During TE treatment, luteinizing hormone (LH) and FSH were rapidly suppressed. This was followed by a parallel decline in inhibin B and sperm concentration. During the early recovery phase, inhibin B concentrations remained suppressed in men who showed a delay in resumption of spermatogenesis, despite higher FSH concentrations. Inhibin B returned to pretreatment concentrations after 24 weeks recovery, when the inverse relationship with FSH was restored. Our results showed the expected inverse physiological relationship between inhibin B and FSH in normal men, with a decline during TE treatment and alpha subsequent resumption of the inverse relationship during recovery. These data clearly support the hypothesis that inhibin B plays a physiological role in the feedback control of FSH secretion, and reflects FSH-stimulated Sertoli cell function.



J Androl 1991 Jul-Aug;12(4):258-63 Related Articles, Links


The effects of normal aging on the response of the pituitary-gonadal axis to chronic clomiphene administration in men.

Tenover JS, Bremner WJ.

Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.

Serum androgens decline with age in normal men, despite normal or elevated bioactive serum gonadotropins, suggesting that primary testicular dysfunction occurs with aging. The authors further assessed the question of age-related testicular dysfunction by evaluating whether raising serum gonadotropins above the normal serum range for an extended time in healthy elderly men might result in bringing their gonadal function to a level similar to that found in young adult men. Five elderly (65 to 85 years old) and five young adult men (26 to 33 years old) were given 50 mg of clomiphene citrate (CC) twice a day for 8 weeks to stimulate gonadotropin production. During that time, testosterone (T), non-sex hormone-binding globulin bound T, and estradiol increased significantly in both age groups, while serum inhibin increased significantly only in the young adult men. The increases in serum androgens with CC administration were significantly greater in the young adult men than in the elderly men. These hormone changes occurred in the setting of serum gonadotropins that increased significantly in both age groups, although there was a tendency for the elderly men to have a smaller increase in luteinizing hormone. Despite 8 weeks of stimulation of the pituitary-gonadal axis by CC administration, the elderly men demonstrated significantly diminished testicular responses compared with the young adult men. Sertoli cell function, as determined by inhibin production, was more diminished in the elderly men than was Leydig cell function. These data strengthen the hypothesis that normal aging in men is accompanied by a decline in testicular function.
 
That study was ... well... informative. :)

However, I do believe that Nolva will work just as effectively to get your "system" back on tract post-cycle. I'm not saying clomid won't work as well... not by any stretch... but my point is, why take clomid, when you can take nolva... everytime I take Cloimid, I get acne... bad acne... and my levels are back to normal

I take Nolva... no acne, no mood swings, and my levels get back to normal... and I actually FEEL better on it... if that makes any sense..

C-ditty
 
Citruscide said:
That study was ... well... informative. :)

However, I do believe that Nolva will work just as effectively to get your "system" back on tract post-cycle. I'm not saying clomid won't work as well... not by any stretch... but my point is, why take clomid, when you can take nolva... everytime I take Cloimid, I get acne... bad acne... and my levels are back to normal

I take Nolva... no acne, no mood swings, and my levels get back to normal... and I actually FEEL better on it... if that makes any sense..

C-ditty

I agree that Nolva will work as well, I was responding to post 1.
 
hhajdo said:


I agree that Nolva will work as well, I was responding to post 1.

LOL -- I get confused sometimes when I see alot of scientiic terms... and then I see a doctors name... and I start wondering about the origin of it... you know... :)

C-ditty -- nice avatar
 
Top Bottom