Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

who has used both TREN ESTERS?

georgie24

New member
is the tren enathate a good compound? does it give ya the "cough" like the de injects do? my overall question is did you notice any differnces between the two esters??????
 
I guess you and me are the only ones.

The tren enan was very good to me. It was a little weaker than 100mg/day daily but that just figures since the enanthate would leave you with slightly less actual tren. But the long term release is nice and I could mix it with regular enan and use it E3D.

I am back on regular acetate now though using the "ulter slin pin for tren" trick and doing dailies.
 
i think black ***** is making a tren enathte too, i would love to hearpositive feedback on that one.. oh yea orb** has a tren enathate too 200mg per ml
 
I'd like to try it one day if I come across any. I've got my stash for all of 2004 already so I'm not looking.
 
HERES SOME INFO ON THE ESTERS. ULTER IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADD TO IT PLS DO:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

originally posted by jubei

Tren acetate is signifigantly stronger mg/mg than enth.

Also keep in mind there are many advantages of short ester compounds that I believe far outweigh the annoyance of ed / eod injections. One of the main benefits is being able to better control unwanted side effects such as gyno.

This is especially true of compounds such as tren and deca, a realization that is illustrated by the strong demand for NPP. Even on a board of nandrolone detractors.

trenbolone (as acetate)
Molecular weight of base: 270.3706
Molecular weight of ester: 60.0524 (acetic acid, 2 carbons)

trenbolone (as hexahydrobencylcarbonate)*same as enth
Molecular weight of base: 270.3706
Molecular weight of ester: 130.1864 (hexahydrobencylcarbonic acid, 7 carbons)
 
okay... I have been on here for a little while now and have been trying to catch on to all this scientific mumbo jumbo that you guys speek now and then...

anyrate, I take it that the more carbons the longer the ester... so what does the molecular weight of ester mean, is it the weight of each carbon or something that is totally over my head???

Whiskey
 
I've used both Parabolan and Finaject, both pharm grade great products from the past. Parabolan, the long chain ester trenbolone cyclohexylmethylcarbonate was similar in half-life to enanthate. Finaject was the acetate version and was the more potent of the two, although parabolan had a huge fan club also.
An amp of parabolan(76 mg trenbolone cyclohexylmethylcarbonate) was comparable only to 58 mg of trenbolone acetate. (The acetate is a little more potent, more effective per milligram, because the acetate ester is lighter and therefore a higher percentage of the weight is trenbolone.) This is why the molecular weight of the ester matters.
Nowdays I just make the regular homebrew tren acetate like most. Still damn fine. I have been meaning to make up some of the enanthate from powder.
 
Finaject rocked.
 
Top Bottom