Anal AssPlorer said:
You guys are going to hate me for this. But I don't have a clue to what that technical jargon is that you are speaking.
Give me another example. Or better yet, tell me an application that does the same thing but ONLY BETTER. It seems the general consensus here is that WebSphere stinks.
Simple example:
The average web page is HTML. You write it like a document, put it on a web server, and there it is. Always the same thing.
But let's say you have a catalog. Since you don't want to write 5000+ different pages, you want to have one page which can just search the whole catalog. Now you've moved from a web page to a web application. So you need to write a program that runs on your web server, takes in the search question and creates a web page on the fly with the answer.
There's a lot of different programming languages to write that program in, depending on how busy the site is, how complex the program(s) will be, education/experience/time of the programmer, and of course money. To run the program, you need another piece of software called an application server. Like WebSphere.
WebSphere is expensive because it can handle extremely complex programs.
That's as dumb as I can make it,

, hope it's clear now.
FYI my company's using it with no problems, installing it the first couple of times was the biggest bitch, but now we've got that fully documented so it'll be easy on the next machine.
win2K, iPlanet webserver, WebSphere app server serving up jsp's applets and servlets, orbacus naming service. Next project will be extending this to use ejb's.