Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

V-12

I've been on it for 5 days now, and have had no further stomach discomfort. The initial body reaction is killer though. Today I put up 80 lb. dumbells in incline bench 4 times. I've never even attempted past 70. I'm liking the results so far. My buddy who is at about the same point I am in lifts is getting cell-tech. We'll see who gains faster. I'll keep you guys up to date on his progess with that stuff compared to the v12 turbo if you want.
 
i went to dpsnutrition.com and typed in "v12 turbo"...and nothing


????

what company makes this?

i'd like to give it a try

-JN-
 
SAN Nutrition makes it.

These new creatines are a joke - have you seen the way it is advertised, hardly inspires confidence. - "With the birth of Fuel Injection V12, faster gains in muscle mass, strength and endurance, become now a reality" lol!

It contains less creatine 3g, and costs more! What's more, it contains "creatine tri-malate" - this is a fallacy, as only 2 malates can bond to a creatine molecule due to their electrical charge (+ 2 charge of the malate) IT IS DI-CREATINE MALATE!. You would honestly be beter off going to a wine merchant, and getting some plain 'ol malic acid - it can be bought for a very cheap price, because the wine industry uses it as a form of preservative. Malate is an intermediatory in the krebs cycle (ATP) - WHY SHOULD DI-MALATE BE ANY BETTER THAN MALATE?

The quantities of the ingredients are so low (mostly 1g), that even if they did anything, you would need a much higher doseage - 1g of AKG lol!, 1g of taurine - lol!


Glycocyamine is included much like with Maximuscle creatine, with the addition of TMG (this is something maximuscle should have done, as tmg keeps the dangerous elevated homocysteine levels arising from glycocyamine - GAA supplementation)- By allowing creatine synthesis to proceed simultaneously with GAA administration , it consumes serum methionine and elevates plasma homocysteine levels (naughty Maximuscle!)

In fact, some experts have estimated that endogenous creatine synthesis is responsible for producing 75% of the total homocysteine present in humans.



Clinical research has shown that elevated serum homocysteine levels are strongly indicative of the chances of developing Coronary heart disease in later life. In fact, just a small (5 microMolar) increase in serum homocysteine levels increases the chances of developing CHD by 60% in men and an incredible 80% in women.



Elevated plasma homocystein levels are also associated with the development of Alzeimers disease, hypertension, neurological defects, dementia, loss of cognitive function and renal/liver disease

When the dietary intake of methionine is insufficient to meet the body's needs, methionine can be obtained by modifying another molecule known as homocysteine. In essence, homocysteine is a methionine molecule lacking its signature methyl group. GAA plus a methyl group (previously synthesised from methionine as S-adenosylmethionine ,SAM, the body's "universal donor") creates creatine.



As a methyl donor, betaine (trimethylglycine) participates in the methionine cycle—primarily in the human liver and kidneys. Inadequate dietary intake of methyl groups leads to hypomethylation in many important pathways, including 1) disturbed hepatic protein (methionine) metabolism as determined by elevated plasma homocysteine concentrations and decreased S-adenosylmethionine concentrations, and 2) inadequate hepatic fat metabolism, which leads to steatosis (fatty accumulation) and subsequent plasma dyslipidemia

There are 2 pathways for homocysteine to be removed: either the re-methylation regenerates methionine , or the trans-sulpherisation pathway degrades homocysteine into cysteine and taurine.



Trimethylglycine can assist in the generation of modest increases of plasma serine and simultaneous increases of plasma cysteine levels . Levels of serine are depressed in some individuals with extcess homocysteine. They are treated with folic acid, cobalamin, vit B6 and pyridoxal-5-phosphate(all in the MRP as vitamins, and a lot less costly than TMG!- excluding the 3-phosphate) Serine is needed so hat folic acid can be converted to its active form. It is also used to shuttle methyl groups between the cytosol and mitachondria, coverting folic acid into its active form. Additionally, it acts as a co factor for methionine/ homocysteine metabolism (I'm sure whey protein/a high protein diet provides more than enough serine for this purpose)



One possible benefit of betain supplementation with TMG is through cell hydration. TMG is an osmolyte that increases the water retention of cells, replaces inorganic salts, and protects intracellular enzymes against osmotically induced or temperature-induced inactivation. betaine is not catabolized, it is used as an organic osmolyte. The regulation of cellular hydration state, and therefore cell volume, is important for maintenance of cell function. Sensitive metabolic pathways include protein turnover, amino acid and ammonia metabolism, carbohydrate and fatty acid metabolism, plasma membrane transport, bile excretion, pH control, and gene _expression. Cells adapt to external osmotic stress by accumulating low-molecular-weight inorganic ions (eg, sodium, potassium, and chloride) and organic osmolytes (eg, methylated amines, certain amino acids, and sugar alcohols). However, the increase in intracellular concentrations of inorganic ions is limited because of their destabilizing effect on protein structure and enzyme function



In various organisms and animal tissues. Mechanistic studies showed that there is little or no binding of betaine to protein surfaces, allowing cells to control the surface tension of water without affecting the ionic strength of the environment, eg, stabilization of lipase.



Betaine is the most effective osmolyte studied for hydration of albumin , forming almost a complete monolayer of water around the protein, and betaine can maintain hemoglobin solvation..

It is rapidly absorbed and utilized as an osmolyte and source of methyl groups and thereby helps to reduce LDL, maintain liver, heart, and kidney health.



Great u think, I can take creatine and increase creatine synthesis by providing the tools that the body needs to do this - wrong studies show that creatine uptake is impaired by the supplementation of GAA (so u don't get any additional benefit)

As 4 the amount of creatine per serving, it is pitiful (there have been no studies showing any extra benefit to this type of creatine)



More bad news: a study found that dietary intake of betaine ranges from an average of 1 g/d to a high of 2.5 g/d (for a diet high in whole wheat and seafood) - V12 has 1.5g. You can easily achive super high levels of betain if you eat a lot of fish, wheat or spinach amonst other foods ( wheat bran has 1339 mg per 100g, spinach 600-635mg/100g)- the 1.5g doesn't seem a great deal.



so the jury is still out on betain, tmg or trimethylglycine or what ever u want to call it. It certainly won't work in the way it is marketed to do.



Dietary methionine intake is necessary for overall good health- but I am sure that you would easily get enough from consuming protein powder or a protein rich diet (V12 has no methionine- seems strange when the purpose is to decrease homocysteine and provide greater synthesis of methionine so that SAM can donate methyl groups to GAA)



I haven't researched N-Acetyl-Glutamine yet, but seeing as v12 only has 1g of this, I can't see it having a superior effect over glutamine. In addition there is 1g of "nito arginine" or arginine alphaketoglutarate ) - which is a component of OKG . There is only 3g of the suposably improved creatine "tri malate" - only "di" possible - this is considerable less than the usual 5g recommendation - do u really think that this is gonna be more than 66% more absorpable!?

The advertising is a load of b.s., as too the name v-12 turbo like a powerful engine, geddit!

I'm not meaning to plug my own products, but I am developing a range, and am debating whether to develop the creatine formula. I did a comparison with Maximuscle 8000ES - ontop of the info I posted above, there are serious no-brainers in Maximuscle's formula - thought I should post it - just shows you that these so called top companies don't do proper research:

MAXIMUSCLE 8000ES
• Creatine Monohydrate 5g
• L-Glutamine 5g
• Glycine 1g
• GAA 1g
• Potassium Bicarbonate 500mg
• Sodium Bicarbonate 500mg
• Albion Magnesium chelate 50mg
• D-pinitol 28mg
• Bioperine 5mg

ATP EXPLOSION
CREATINE MAGNESIUM CHELATE 10g
ALPHA LIPOIC ACID (R-ENAMETOR) 600mg
RIBOSE 10g
D-PINITOL 500mg
GLUCOSE 18g
TAURINE 5g
GLUTAMINE 5g

ADDED BENEFIT OF THE tribasic sodium phospahate , other insulin mimickers, and OKG (extra glutamine source) in the whey/meal formulae. Hopefully the loading of phosphates will facilitate a greater uptake and utilization of creatine , providing a large amount of substrates (need 90g of sodium bicarb to do the same job)

p.s creatine magnesium chelate is superior to monohydrate and magnesium chelate in separate forms (increased absorption through higher pH and no stomach upsets)

Maximuscle has arginine and glycine (GAA) for increased hydration , I found a study showing that the perfusion of very low concentrations of arginine stimulated sodium and water absorption, but higher concentrations had the reverse effect. If 500mg is arginine, what is the point of it being in – can get this from the protein powder you take with it. It also seems that more is worse.

The glycine in the formula (1g),is included for the same effect but a study reported this - It is concluded that excess glycine in relation to sodium in an ORS may lead to osmotic diarrhoea, and a high amount of absorbed glycine may result in osmotic diuresis with poor net rehydration. Altogether, the present study failed to find any improvement ('Super-ORS') by addition of glycine to an ORS containing 60 mmol/l of sodium.

- Glycerol is “the daddy” for hyperhydration – but u need 90g!- and to take lots of water.
 
Last edited:
My thoughts on it so far is that it is a bit too expensive for me to try again. It's good stuff and all, but I think I can get the same results by not spending this much money.

I was talking to a manager at Vitamin World and he told me that milk thistle is good for detoxing your liver, so the creatine in your next cycle will be much more useful to your body. Is this true?
 
Milk thistle is fantastic for a detox. The bi-product of creatine, creatinine is found in the urine, when you take creatine. Creatinine is linked to hepatoxicity, however numerous long term studies of creatine useage have shown no damage to the kidneys whatsoever.
To say that detoxifying your liver will make creatine absorption/uptake more effective is just dumb. - the ergogenic effect occurs in your muscles!

Here's a study of milk thistle on alcoholics with cirrhosis of the liver:

Randomized controlled trial of silymarin treatment in patients with cirrhosis of the liver.

Ferenci P, Dragosics B, Dittrich H, Frank H, Benda L, Lochs H, Meryn S, Base W, Schneider B.

1st Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Vienna, Austria.

Silymarin, the active principle of the milk thistle Silybum marianum, protects experimental animals against various hepatotoxic substances. To determine the effect of silymarin on the outcome of patients with cirrhosis, a double blind, prospective, randomized study was performed in 170 patients with cirrhosis. 87 patients (alcoholic 46, non-alcoholic 41; 61 male, 26 female; Child A, 47; B, 37; C, 3; mean age 57) received 140 mg silymarin three times daily. 83 patients (alcoholic 45, non-alcoholic 38; 62 male, 21 female; Child A, 42; B, 32; C, 9: mean age 58) received a placebo. Non-compliant patients and patients who failed to come to a control were considered as 'drop outs' and were withdrawn from the study. All patients received the same treatment until the last patient entered had finished 2-years of treatment. The mean observation period was 41 months. There were 10 drop outs in the placebo group and 14 in the treatment group. In the placebo group, 37 (+2 drop outs) patients had died, and in 31 of these, death was related to liver disease. In the treatment group, 24 (+4 drop outs) had died, and in 18 of these, death was related to liver disease. The 4-year survival rate was 58 +/- 9% (S.E.) in silymarin-treated patients and 39 +/- 9% in the placebo group (P = 0.036). Analysis of subgroups indicated that treatment was effective in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (P = 0.01) and in patients initially rated 'Child A' (P = 0.03). No side effects of drug treatment were observed

A little known added benefit of milk thistle, is that it can stabilize blood glucose levels and insulin response, as shown in this abstract:

Long-term (12 months) treatment with an anti-oxidant drug (silymarin) is effective on hyperinsulinemia, exogenous insulin need and malondialdehyde levels in cirrhotic diabetic patients.

Velussi M, Cernigoi AM, De Monte A, Dapas F, Caffau C, Zilli M.

Anti-Diabetes Centre, Monfalcone Hospital, Gorizia, Italy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Several studies have demonstrated that diabetic patients with cirrhosis require insulin treatment because of insulin resistance. As chronic alcoholic liver damage is partly due to the lipoperoxidation of hepatic cell membranes, anti-oxidizing agents may be useful in treating or preventing damage due to free radicals. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether long-term treatment with silymarin is effective in reducing lipoperoxidation and insulin resistance in diabetic patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: A 12-month open, controlled study was conducted in two well-matched groups of insulin-treated diabetics with alcoholic cirrhosis. One group (n=30) received 600 mg silymarin per day plus standard therapy, while the control group (n=30) received standard therapy alone. The efficacy parameters, measured regularly during the study, included fasting blood glucose levels, mean daily blood glucose levels, daily glucosuria levels, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and malondialdehyde levels. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease (p<0.01) in fasting blood glucose levels, mean daily blood glucose levels, daily glucosuria and HbA1c levels already after 4 months of treatment in the silymarin group. In addition, there was a significant decrease (p<0.01) in fasting insulin levels and mean exogenous insulin requirements in the treated group, while the untreated group showed a significant increase (p<0.05) in fasting insulin levels and a stabilized insulin need. These findings are consistent with the significant decrease (p<0.01) in basal and glucagon-stimulated C-peptide levels in the treated group and the significant increase in both parameters in the control group. Another interesting finding was the significant decrease (p<0.01) in malondialdehyde/levels observed in the treated group. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that treatment with silymarin may reduce the lipoperoxidation of cell membranes and insulin resistance, significantly decreasing endogenous insulin overproduction and the need for exogenous insulin administration.
 
Why are the effects of creatine on the second cycle less noticable? Did my body naturally increase creatine levels to the point where taking it as a supplement is no longer useful?
 
NorgePrecision said:
Why are the effects of creatine on the second cycle less noticable? Did my body naturally increase creatine levels to the point where taking it as a supplement is no longer useful?

It's a good question, as many people seem to report this. (I am a vegetarian myself, so I don't get much creatine from my diet - hence a good response)
There have been hundreds of trials confirming the efficacy of creatine, but I have yet to see one looking at the effects of repeated cycles. I am merely hypothisising, but perhaps supplementation causes a long term suppresion of creatine synthesis - meaning a much longer period between cycles than is suggested would be more effective. Perhaps a creatine supp containing GAA (glycocyamine) might be effective for you (this converts into creatine by bonding with methionine) - however there are risks associated with it's use if you don't get enough methionine from your diet and or supp with aforementioned compounds, dangerous levels of homocysteine can occur ,see previous post.- (homocysteine builds up- see previous post)

- excess homocysteine (used as a reservoir of bond energy to form methionine) is linked with coronary heart disease, degenerative brain disorders like Parkinsons and Alzheimers and many other illnesses/diseases - not funny.

In regard to the GAA , studies showed that the more GAA in the formula (and subsequent conversion),the less the uptake of creatine by the muscles. However, if your body seems to have downgraded its response to creatine supplentation - GAA might be worth a shot , as it converts into creatine; giving you creatine via a completely different pathway (which may have an attenuated i response)

Just make sure you eat properly, and take it combined with the right supplements (see previous post)

Just a thought - If this works for you, allternating between the 2 methods might give better long term effects.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom