Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
US releases 9/11 Pentagon video
- Thread starter JayC9
- Start date
T
The Shadow
Guest
interesting
Delinquent
Well-known member
Devil's advocate here.
Have you seen the video? There is ONE frame that shows something that kinda looks like an airplane. The next frame it captures shows the explosion. Now, you can't tell me in this day and age, that it's impossible to superimpose an airplane using motion blur through photoshop onto the film. Ask any computer graphics or digital art student how easy it would be
Have you seen the video? There is ONE frame that shows something that kinda looks like an airplane. The next frame it captures shows the explosion. Now, you can't tell me in this day and age, that it's impossible to superimpose an airplane using motion blur through photoshop onto the film. Ask any computer graphics or digital art student how easy it would be
T
The Shadow
Guest
the explosion was photoshopped as well??
whatever it was was very very close to the ground....Im not sure a missile could have been coming in from that angle
whatever it was was very very close to the ground....Im not sure a missile could have been coming in from that angle
Delinquent
Well-known member
The Shadow said:
Explosion was definitely real but like I said, I'm playing devils advocate here. It would be relatively simple for such an image to be added to the film
bignate73
New member
The Shadow said:
and you think a 757 could???
the thing that i find funny is that most of the accounts I see about the angle the plane flew, was that it would have had to fly straight in to create the perfect circle that it did. it was coming in actually on an angle with no engine/wing impact damage to the building. and the fuselage would have made a more oblong shape.
perfectly shaped exit hole:
Last edited:
hamstershaver
New member
good point about the circle, that is kind of strangebignate73 said:and you think a 757 could???
the thing that i find funny is that most of the accounts I see about the angle the plane flew, was that it would have had to fly straight in (with no wings) to create the perfect circle that it did. it was coming in actually on an angle with no engine/wing impact damage to the building. and the fuselage would have made a more oblong shape.
Testosterone boy
New member
There are unanswered questions:
There was little wreckage left which means that most of the plane burned. Aluminum creates a 4000 degree fire which would have scorched the grass I believe?
There was nothing left of the two main engines. Jet engines are built to have an inferno in them, I doubt they would have burned and disappeared?
The hole is round? The plane is not. The adacent windows were unbroken for the most part?
Why wait 6 years and release another frame? Did that make any difference?
That one piece of brightly painted aluminum that was conspicuously away from the wreckage did nothing to calm my concerns.
There was little wreckage left which means that most of the plane burned. Aluminum creates a 4000 degree fire which would have scorched the grass I believe?
There was nothing left of the two main engines. Jet engines are built to have an inferno in them, I doubt they would have burned and disappeared?
The hole is round? The plane is not. The adacent windows were unbroken for the most part?
Why wait 6 years and release another frame? Did that make any difference?
That one piece of brightly painted aluminum that was conspicuously away from the wreckage did nothing to calm my concerns.
Similar threads
- Locked
