Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

UG Tren VS. Homebrew

Tren enanathate is well worth the money. One shot per week Vs. 4 or more of regular tren?? You do the math.
 
I would pay for enanthate but not acetate.
 
I think the major point would be those who dont want to actually make it. Alot of people dont know your probably taking it and in there minds seing a little lab in your kitchen may look like a harsh thing or it could be alot to hide from them. I make it myself because its simple but I understand those reasons as well. Also sterility, if you take the precautions you know your own shit is atleast sterile. However I could see paying for enanthate I guess but ed injects dont bother me and I know when it kick in in 3 days. I love the feeling when i put somehting in it starts working and fast !!!
Short acting esters are the way to go. In fast and you can get them out fast if shits hits the fan......
 
well why not buy tren enathate in powder form, and convert it at home ???....still would me much cheaper...I personally love acetate.
 
I think what should be notes is most people I think favor short esters yet are usually more expensive. Tren being the exception. Also some people think the sides are very harsh (not me) atleast if you run acetate and the sides suck you couls stop it quickly whereas with enanthate you would be looking at over a week....
 
muscleup said:
well why not buy tren enathate in powder form, and convert it at home ???
Click to expand...

because a powder source that is reliable and pure (there are like 5 of them) is much harder to find than a guy with reasonable UG gear (there are thousands of them). Besides UG tren enan is about 2x the cost of homebrew tren acet in my sources. That's not a big difference when you factor in the convenience, no-making, no-mess, no ed shots, the high conc of ug tren versus 75mg/ml, etc. I can make more in the hour or so that it takes to run a kit and filter than the $50 difference it costs to have it all arrive ready to go (This would be true for anyone who makes at least 50k gross per annum, which is a modest salary in today's world.) Also, fina pellets are becoming increasingly watched, and there is increasing risk on that front, as more than a few people have gotten letters from the dea recently after ordering fina pellets. Add to this the fact that most homebrew tren is 50mg/ml or less rather than the advertised 75mg/ml, and the deal doesn't look so good. Also, most of the coughing, pulmonary edema, etc have been attributed to the methylcellulose of the pellets, so bypassing the pellets avoids those health risks. The heyday of homebrew is over, it's probably time to move on.
 
LMAO...YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!...There are several legit powder sources...ALL the UG labs are getting there powders mainly form these guys...I have had a few tested myself and YES they come back with 98% pure results...Homebrew is the way to go in my eyes, as long as you have your pwderes tested.
majutsu said:
because a powder source that is reliable and pure (there are like 5 of them) is much harder to find than a guy with reasonable UG gear (there are thousands of them). Besides UG tren enan is about 2x the cost of homebrew tren acet in my sources. That's not a big difference when you factor in the convenience, no-making, no-mess, no ed shots, the high conc of ug tren versus 75mg/ml, etc. I can make more in the hour or so that it takes to run a kit and filter than the $50 difference it costs to have it all arrive ready to go (This would be true for anyone who makes at least 50k gross per annum, which is a modest salary in today's world.) Also, fina pellets are becoming increasingly watched, and there is increasing risk on that front, as more than a few people have gotten letters from the dea recently after ordering fina pellets. Add to this the fact that most homebrew tren is 50mg/ml or less rather than the advertised 75mg/ml, and the deal doesn't look so good. Also, most of the coughing, pulmonary edema, etc have been attributed to the methylcellulose of the pellets, so bypassing the pellets avoids those health risks. The heyday of homebrew is over, it's probably time to move on.
Click to expand...
 
What UG companies are currently making Tren with the enanthate es.?? I only know of TTOKKYO and British Dragon and I believe that both are acetate.
 
alot of us have pesky family,wives,girlfriedns,kids,dogs,cats, evil mother in-laws,,,,homebrew is def not an option for me. if i was living alone and single id prolly start a ug lab lol
 
I hear ya bro
georgie24 said:
alot of us have pesky family,wives,girlfriedns,kids,dogs,cats, evil mother in-laws,,,,homebrew is def not an option for me. if i was living alone and single id prolly start a ug lab lol
Click to expand...
 
just depends on you situtation at home no nosy people around homebrew
cant then ug.homebrew will save you alot of loot
 
Muscleup, I wasn't asking for a source. I think u could name the manufacturer....It dosen go aginst board rules. I was just asking for a name i.e. TTOKKYO or IP
 
majutsu said:
because a powder source that is reliable and pure (there are like 5 of them) is much harder to find than a guy with reasonable UG gear (there are thousands of them). Besides UG tren enan is about 2x the cost of homebrew tren acet in my sources. That's not a big difference when you factor in the convenience, no-making, no-mess, no ed shots, the high conc of ug tren versus 75mg/ml, etc. I can make more in the hour or so that it takes to run a kit and filter than the $50 difference it costs to have it all arrive ready to go (This would be true for anyone who makes at least 50k gross per annum, which is a modest salary in today's world.) Also, fina pellets are becoming increasingly watched, and there is increasing risk on that front, as more than a few people have gotten letters from the dea recently after ordering fina pellets. Add to this the fact that most homebrew tren is 50mg/ml or less rather than the advertised 75mg/ml, and the deal doesn't look so good. Also, most of the coughing, pulmonary edema, etc have been attributed to the methylcellulose of the pellets, so bypassing the pellets avoids those health risks. The heyday of homebrew is over, it's probably time to move on.
Click to expand...

Actually:

1. If you make your tren in your off time you've lost lost no money at all.
2. Most homebrew fina kits deliver 75-100mg/ml; it's up to you.
3. with homebrew there is ZERO chance of it being underdosed
4. Homebrew is just getting started, my friend.
 
Oh thats cool bro...I did not mean to be an asshole...Actuallt there are no "legit" companies making it as of yet...They are all UG labs...
jloflexin405 said:
Muscleup, I wasn't asking for a source. I think u could name the manufacturer....It dosen go aginst board rules. I was just asking for a name i.e. TTOKKYO or IP
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

JimAbs43
Podcast Evolutionary.org UG Supplements 10 - N2Guard vs Liv52 - the truth!
Replies
16
Views
2K
RoySimpson
RoySimpson
V
how to run trenbolone hex vs. other tren
Replies
12
Views
1K
Arabian
Arabian
S
First tren cycle
Replies
16
Views
1K
25homes
25homes
H
tren and test for best bulking stack?
Replies
13
Views
2K
ceo
ceo
S
This will be the 5th cycle I have done.
Replies
23
Views
3K
25homes
25homes
Top Bottom