Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Tren or Finaplix is there a difference?

FknKnuckleHd

New member
Tren or Finaplix is there a diference? I know the obvious differences. I ask the question because I've heard and read resent threads of talk of major side affect from doing a cycle. I have only used "finaplix" which I personally made numerous times for not only myself but for close friends as well. The only real side I've seen is my mood swings. Don't get me wrong I get insanely hard and typically put on 10lb of lean muscle and drop a couple of % in bf. So are the sides that I hear so much about coming from Tren made by vet and pharm companies or is about equal with the home brew Finaplix?
Second question, who out there has used Tren and the homemade Finaplix and which do you prefer and why besides the fact that Finaplix is a shit load cheaper!
My fina cycles go for 10wks @75mg ED

Thanks and I hope my questions made some sense?
 
If you feel I asked a dumb ass question and sould go back and do my homework please spare me the flaming, or not, fuck it its Friday!
 
wht r u a fknknucklehd or smthng?

j/k i know the search is messed up for non plats
tren is fina, tren is component th
 
I would think any product compounded using pure tren powder would be infinitely superior to a homebrew manufactured from Finaplex pellets(implants)
 
"Inquiring Minds Want To Know"



that's one of the many reasons this website is here for, to ask questions.
 
Yossarian2000 said:
I would think any product compounded using pure tren powder would be infinitely superior to a homebrew manufactured from Finaplex pellets(implants)

Is there any particular reason you think this ?
 
I have no problem with a question like this. This is why the board is here right? As gnarr3 said chemically it is the same thing as far as I know. One big difference is that manufactured tren from a reputable company is going to have less impurities and therefore reduce the risk of infection. I have made homebrew for years and I always make sure that my work area is clean like an operating room to lessen the chances of contamination. I have never had a problem.
 
Good question. Chemically, they are all the same, tren, fina, and component th. However, the question apart from sterility and composition is . . . how good is the extraction of tren from pellets? I have seen a few chemical analyses over the years, using the solubility of tren in bb and ba solution of different ratios and amounts. In general, the average fina kit gives you too little "magic solution" to really extract say 4g of tren. If you let the solution sit, you get the red color, which IS oxidation. Now, this is HOTLY debated, but some say the oxidation disrupts the double bond structure of tren (which is really deca with some extra double bonds, roughly). That kind of oxidation would also disrupt the activity of that tren. So you either take a quick bath in ba/bb and extract a fraction of the tren, or leave it long and oxidize part of it away. Others say the oxidation does not affect the tren. I figure all these debates could be settled by 3 people making a fina kit from instructions and submitting it for testing. This has been done occasionally, but the results, which show 1/2 to 3/4 dosing aren't widely publisized. I suppose for the cost of homebrew, low dosing wouldn't really matter, just use more. Maybe people get side effects when they switch to tren from a lab because they're using more tren than they have before from their low dose homebrew. They best way would be to run a fina kit, then recrystallize the fina powder. Filter, dry in an oven, then use a powder kit to make accurately doses home tren! When this is done with 5 carts (10g) a good homebrewer can yield 9-9.1 g of pure powder. So clearly, homebrew without recrystallization is underdosed. I wouldn't worry so much about infection unless you're a slob.
 
Chemistry is probably one of my worse subjects.

I've always assumed that my homebrew tren would be a little underdosed. Never complained about the results though.

I may try an alternative to homebrew, either by tren powder or a finished product, and compare the results visually.
 
I can say the UG lab stuff works wonders. The expense though is starting to get to me though esp. when i hear about the homebrew producing similiar results. This is why im currently undertaking steps to produce my first homebrew. Since there are ways to convert your homebrew to produce more per mg there should be no reason for yours to be underdosed, from what i understand. Im just learning this homebrew principal though so please correct me if im wrong.
 
bigmk said:
I can say the UG lab stuff works wonders. The expense though is starting to get to me though esp. when i hear about the homebrew producing similiar results. This is why im currently undertaking steps to produce my first homebrew. Since there are ways to convert your homebrew to produce more per mg there should be no reason for yours to be underdosed, from what i understand. Im just learning this homebrew principal though so please correct me if im wrong.

I'm far from an expert on the conversion/chemistry of homebrew tren.

For the conversion of the pellets I just took what was common knowledge on how to convert it. I've never reseached on exactly what happens on the molecular level during the conversion process.

Since i'm not a chemist i just accept the fact that my homebrew is going to be a little underdosed but most likely never overdosed. I imagine the dosage of each pellet is going to be pretty accurate but you're still going to lose a few or more mg/ml and i'm not going to add in all the extra steps to get a perfect conversion ;if that is even possible without proper lab equipment.

disclaimer ~ I have been known to be wrong from time to time.
 
Top Bottom