tren acetate vs. Parabolan

[cbeaks]

Is the difference really that much more noticeable? I wouldn't think it would be. It is a bit like saying that test prop is better than test Cypionate since Parabolan is just long acting tren. I know there are few people that have tried Parabolan so it may be tough to get an answer on this. Maybe Fonz can comment.

 

[Ulter]

Para was just easier to use because you could shoot it every 3-4 days with your cyp or enanthate. TA you have inject daily to get an even blood level. Granted you had to use a 1/4 more but to me it's worth it.

 

[Juice Authority]

Is the difference really that much more noticeable? I wouldn't think it would be. It is a bit like saying that test prop is better than test Cypionate since Parabolan is just long acting tren. I know there are few people that have tried Parabolan so it may be tough to get an answer on this. Maybe Fonz can comment.

Para has a different ester that's long acting. Plus para was designed for humans not cows. Tren is also progestagenic and acts at the progesterone receptor.

 

[lartinos]

with any very suppressive/gyno causing AAS (nan/tren) I think using the shorter lasting ester is the way to go.

 

[cbeaks]

I agree with most of the comments above but there are a few people that have actually used parabolan that claim there is nothing like it. That just doesn't make much since to me since tren acetate is basically the same thing with a shorter half life. The fact that tren acetate isn't made specifically for humans should make little difference in its effectiveness

 

[lartinos]

I agree with most of the comments above but there are a few people that have actually used parabolan that claim there is nothing like it. That just doesn't make much since to me since tren acetate is basically the same thing with a shorter half life. The fact that tren acetate isn't made specifically for humans should make little difference in its effectiveness

How exactly is it better? There is no way in hell unless pellets weren't able to be gotten I'd ever try this stuff. I don't want anything stronger the what I've got. The fact is......is that it isn't stronger. If you drink a BUD or a Heineken they will both get you drunk at the same rate.

 

[Ulter]

"BUD or a Heineken they will both get you drunk at the same rate" Nope

I have used both, the people that say that Para is so much better are being nostalgic.

 

[lartinos]

"BUD or a Heineken they will both get you drunk at the same rate" Nope

I have used both, the people that say that Para is so much better are being nostalgic.

so you agree with me, right? Same shit

 

[poantrex]

I agree with most of the comments above but there are a few people that have actually used parabolan that claim there is nothing like it. That just doesn't make much since to me since tren acetate is basically the same thing with a shorter half life. The fact that tren acetate isn't made specifically for humans should make little difference in its effectiveness

I am not sure why parabolan is better, but it is. Ulter seems to be in the minority here, but myself and many bros that have used legit negma parabolan all agree that it is far better - there was no better drug for putting on mass and losing bodyfat back in its day.

 

[Ulter]

I think people who think it was better are comparing it to what they use now and forgetting that they are now 12-15 years older and now have a cycle count in double digits. So of course tren's not going to yield the same results para did when they first used it. Neither is anything else.
If you want to compare them side by side then that's the only way to do it. Not compare tren now to para then.

 

[cbeaks]

I guess we will have to wait to hear back from the guys that can actually try the new parabolan on the market to see how it compares to the acetate