Time Magazine's "Man of the Year" Choice for 2002

[BangedUp]

So who do you think it should be?

 

[Testosterone boy]

My pick is GW.

 

[TxArmyGuy]

GW

or Woodin

 

[EF Chris]

They already said it's the female whistleblowers.

I think it should have been Bono. Bush hasn't done any more than what he did right after 9/11.

 

[BangedUp]

They already said it's the female whistleblowers.

I think it should have been Bono. Bush hasn't done any more than what he did right after 9/11.

Yea, I just read that about the whistleblowers.

Anyone disagree with this choice? Think it should have been someone else?

 

[TxArmyGuy]

well to me the whistleblowers doesn't seem very significant I haven't seen a direct effect on with my life based on their actions

 

[Testosterone boy]

They already said it's the female whistleblowers.

I think it should have been Bono. Bush hasn't done any more than what he did right after 9/11.

I picked Bush because of the global uncertainties that we are starring in and his role in the monumental GOP victories.

 

[EF Chris]

I can understand Bush. I saw a few choices and thought they were the finalists. They were Bush, bin Laden, Hussein and Eminem.

How they have the audacity to put Eminem up there with those guys no one will ever know.

 

[BangedUp]

While what these women did was definitely noteworthy, they didn't dominate the news the way I think a "Man of the Year" ought to.

Two guys dominated the news for nearly one month, to the virtual exclusion of any other stories. Fox, CNN, and MSNBC provided 24/7 coverage of these two; they kept campaigning politicians out of the news and off the airwaves; they may even have played a role in the defeat of Kathleen Kennedy Townsend during the Md. gubernatorial race.

I nominate John Allen Muhammed and Lee Boyd Malvo as Time's Men of the Year.

 

[Frackal]

It will be a good thing if the whistleblowers win it