Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

The Internet as We know it will Soon Be Gone!

2Thick

Elite Mentor
Platinum
EF Logger
Well, gents. It has been a good run, but by 2006 we will all be fearing for our freedom if we come to a chat board on an Anabolic site.

Soon enough, we will need permission to post something. All thanks for Microsoft and their new Windows version in 2006 that places a digital fingerprint on EVERYTHING you do, say, buy, use and play.

Email your State and Federal Congressmen today and every week!

Picture, if you will, an information infrastructure that encourages censorship, surveillance and suppression of the creative impulse. Where anonymity is outlawed and every penny spent is accounted for. Where the powers that be can smother subversive (or economically competitive) ideas in the cradle, and no one can publish even a laundry list without the imprimatur of Big Brother. Some prognosticators are saying that such a construct is nearly inevitable. And this infrastructure is none other than the former paradise of rebels and free-speechers: the Internet.

A concurrent step would be the adoption of “trusted computing,” a system by which not only people but computer programs would be stamped with identifying marks. Those would link with certificates that determine whether programs are uncorrupted and cleared to run on your computer.

“It’s not going to be all right not to know who’s on the other end of the wire.” Governments will be able to tax e-commerce—and dictators can keep track of who’s saying what.
 
Did you really think that this whole digital revolution that we have enjoyed over the past 10 years is without a pricetag?

Facial recognition is already in use (although it hasn't been very effective at all).

Won't be long until retinal scanning (much like that in Minority report) will be a reality.

Technology can free us to do anything while digitally shackling us at the same time.

Welcome to the New World Order.
 
It's not as if some 17-year old whiz kid hacker type won't figure out a way to suppress or alter the digital fingerprint within a month of the Windows release....no reason to panic.
 
tiger88 said:
lol you being jewish always look for the cheap free way

OH SHIZAT!

PWNED
 
i hate this world. ":mad:

more every day:kaioken:

more every second :kaioken:

WHY WONT ANYONE <<<<<<<<<<<WAKE UP>>>>>>>>>

the country is becoming a police state

and im gunna be the only real "American" SHOT DEAD becuase im no ones drone slave

"long live wicked BABALON"
:kaioken:
 
There are plenty of ways around any such concepts.

If one country enforces something, then go through another one.

If one company implements something, use another.

There have been scares similar to this in the past and they have been unfounded.
 
Y_Lifter said:
Or you could just buy your Porn at the store... [/QUO

TE]



i do that now since my pc got AIDS and other shit from downloading bunk porn and i liek to jerk off in my recliner not my pc chair
 
TOMCAT said:
Damn, these kinda comments used to get people banned around here... WTF ?

They stopped bannings since peeps just come back eventually anyway....
 
If I am ever reincarnated- just look for dawkins in the avarnlo
 
Sorry if rambling but here are some quick thoughts:

The issue of the Internet is more a question of taxation than of security. If it can be taxed, the government will be all over it. Believe me, they would love to do it now, but are not for a few reasons.

1. Watchdog groups and similar are fighting it - join them

In spite of this, many states are already taxing "alternative communication networks", such as an arrangement whereby orgainzations use IP-based internet telephony insead of the phone service.

This issue is tax, not security. Security will be a corollary andf probably the means used to foist it on new Americans.

2. The other objection is that the current tax code is a paean to the middle class, which aggressively uses the Internet.

Gicvernmetn tax policy is to assrape tehwealthy and ignore the poor, while using a web of deductions that aer unavailable to high income earners to placate themiddles. This tax would hit the middle classs squarely
 
tiger88 said:
2thick i owned u on ur own thread bro

doh- tiger wnats to be reincarnated sooner rather than later....
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
Gicvernmetn tax policy is to assrape tehwealthy and ignore the poor, while using a web of deductions that aer unavailable to high income earners to placate themiddles. This tax would hit the middle classs squarely

why don't you sober up and then come back :)
 
2Thick said:


You are the middle class, so i would stop being so surly

I was for 26 years. So what? I am not ashamed of it, notr does a middle class upbringing affect the validity of my points.

Only in the last few years have I had some nice breakthroughs to allow me to join that elusive and apparently hated top 1%.
 
PIGEON-RAT said:


why don't you sober up and then come back :)

Yeah my typing blows. Guilty.

However, the point is right on about the tax code being a middle class subsidy.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


I was for 26 years. So what? I am not ashamed of it, notr does a middle class upbringing affect the validity of my points.

Only in the last few years have I had some nice breakthroughs to allow me to join that elusive and apparently hated top 1%.


I did not know that you had over 100 million dollars in liquid assest..

<cough> bullshit<cough>
 
2Thick said:



I did not know that you had over 100 million dollars in liquid assest..

<cough> bullshit<cough>

fuck no not even close.

I meant in annual income sir.
 
Matt, I normally don't bust on people for spelling (maybe grammar, but let's not go there), but damn bro.

Did you have a 3 martini lunch?
 
2Thick said:


So you make over 300k per year?

Sweet. You and every dentist I have ever met.

Relevance?


Anyway, for your own personal growth:

Average DOCTOR salary in the US is $170K. Dentists are lower.
I work in medical publishing - only the specialists command $300K or more....highest paid are plastic surgeons.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:


Relevance?


Anyway, for your own personal growth:

Average DOCTOR salary in the US is $170K. Dentists are lower.
I work in medical publishing - only the specialists command $300K or more....highest paid are plastic surgeons.

Average includes small towns and family practice.

Large cities and many specialzations exceed 1 million per year easily. Cardiology comes to mind as a cash cow.

Anyhoo, just reminding you of how unimpressive over 300k per year really is when a decent small business is 100k per year. There are at least 3-4 regular members with small businesses with 100k gross sales per year.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
Average DOCTOR salary in the US is $170K.

Only cause there are tons of shit dog GP and FPs pulling down the average.... similar to any other profession....
 
2Thick said:


Average includes small towns and family practice.

Large cities and many specialzations exceed 1 million per year easily. Cardiology comes to mind as a cash cow.

Anyhoo, just reminding you of how unimpressive over 300k per year really is when a decent small business is 100k per year. There are at least 3-4 regular members with small businesses with 100k gross sales per year.

I never even said I was impressed. Why the hurry to tear it down?

Class warfare?

Envy?

Socialism?
 
I live in San Diego. I know quite a few Doctors and high level execs.

This is not exact science, but here is what I consiser "RICH" in San Diego.

300k+ in annual income and 1 million dollars in assets (not liquid, your house equity counts but you need to subtract all liabilities)

In other parts of the country I'd say you were rich with half that.. 150K a year and 500K in net assets.
 
2Thick said:
Anyhoo, just reminding you of how unimpressive over 300k per year really is when a decent small business is 100k per year. There are at least 3-4 regular members with small businesses with 100k gross sales per year.

Some make even more.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
Sorry if rambling but here are some quick thoughts:

The issue of the Internet is more a question of taxation than of security. If it can be taxed, the government will be all over it. Believe me, they would love to do it now, but are not for a few reasons.

1. Watchdog groups and similar are fighting it - join them

In spite of this, many states are already taxing "alternative communication networks", such as an arrangement whereby orgainzations use IP-based internet telephony insead of the phone service.

This issue is tax, not security. Security will be a corollary andf probably the means used to foist it on new Americans.

2. The other objection is that the current tax code is a paean to the middle class, which aggressively uses the Internet.

Gicvernmetn tax policy is to assrape tehwealthy and ignore the poor, while using a web of deductions that aer unavailable to high income earners to placate themiddles. This tax would hit the middle classs squarely

The Left's beloved UN has it's eyes on the Internet, too.
 
atlantabiolab said:


The Left's beloved UN has it's eyes on the Internet, too.


Deserves a bump.
 
Top Bottom