Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

The FACE on MARS.

Supposedly, quite a few of them escaped to earth and are now living under the mountains near Mexico. Not sure what they are waiting for though.
 
Clearly, YellowD's Avatar is evidence of an alien life form on Earth. Though he is posing as a sexy, singing Prince whom the ladies love oh so much, I'm not fooled---no earthling would combine that hairdo with that lougue jacket & mustache. :alien: ....:D

This thread might not last here very long...
 
Yeah i downloaded the new high res image off of some site, the damn thing was 5 megs! haha, anyway, they said that each pixel is 5 feet. So i opened up my art program and counted the pixels from one end to the other, x'd it by 5 and it came out to 9200 feet. thats like a little over 3 miles right? 2,500 feet in a mile? I really don't see how people could have carved something that big and detailed in that sort of size, unless they were doing it fromt he air with some lazer cutters or some shit. I dunno, I always believed that it might have been something, but now that i realize how big the thing actually is, well, i dunno now, i'm thinking probably not. But if they ever send any surface parties to mars, I'd definately say check it out.
 
5280 feet in a mile. So its actually under 2 miles if your method of calculation is correct. You bring up a good point. Of course, if the intent was for the structure to be seen from great distances, such size would be necessary.

I don't think such a project would be impossible. Look at what the ancient Egyptians did with the Pyramids. The Giza Pyramids are both enormous and mathematically precise. The "face" doesn't have nearly as much precision as the Egyptians were able to create.
 
StoneColdGold said:
5280 feet in a mile. So its actually under 2 miles if your method of calculation is correct. You bring up a good point. Of course, if the intent was for the structure to be seen from great distances, such size would be necessary.

I don't think such a project would be impossible. Look at what the ancient Egyptians did with the Pyramids. The Giza Pyramids are both enormous and mathematically precise. The "face" doesn't have nearly as much precision as the Egyptians were able to create.
Click to expand...

I was going to use that analogy :mad:
 
The movie "MISSION TO MARS" with Gary Sinise (lieutenant Dan in Forest Gump) was pretty interesting..did anybody else see it? It seriously fucked with me..or maybe it was the joint I smoked...hmmm
 
It only looks like a face to us because we are limited by our own definition of what a face looks like.

There is no universal law that other forms of life need follow the same conventions. Other life forms could be methane-breathers...or not have a respiratory system at all....certainly they are not bound in any way to have a "face" as we think it.

That thing on Mars is just a random geological formation.

:teleport:
 
Well, I know there's a shit ton of stuff on earth, formations and such, that can't be explained yet either. easter island for one. i saw a show on it a few weeks ago. Unknown how the fuck they actually moved the statues from one side of the island to the other or how they even got them to stand upright, or how they even balanced the hats on top of them...

Then there's those drawings in the sand I forget where exactly...With the ants and spiders and monkeys and all that...They're huge and can be seen fromt he sky. Ancient, yet meant to be viewed from above...Why? How? Who knows. Stonehenge? No idea...

And no to mention that whe they dug up the Egyptian places, that they found an abundance of "moonmen" type satues and spaceship type statues. Egypt has a huge relation with spacey and unknown stuff (pyramids).

So as for the face...Well, looking at it, I mean it IS a weird formation...Both top areas are rounded, and both sides are flat. It really does look like it could have been a face at one time, but got severely weathered from winds and rivers and whatnot. However, this is one thing to note, the thing is definately scarred by channels of sorts, you can see them on the right side of the formation. now if it's caused by water, where did the water come from, since that whole area is elevated?

There's no area around the formation containing the channels, they're all on top of the formation. Water can't just stay on top of that formation and refuse to run off into the surrounding areas. Sooo, with that in mind we can safely rule out NATURAL water erosion. Of course, they could also be roads..roads that mave become worn and misshapen over time. Who knows. All i know is that it doesn't look natural, not with those channels running on the face..I could see if maybe they ran off into the surrounding area, but they don't. therefore something is definately fishy about it. Widns definately don't make those kind of channels. Earthquakes possibly, but we don't know enough about the plate tectonics of Mars to even know if that area is a prime spot for earthquakes. If I can realize this, i think NASA has realized it too, and they know something's up as well. :alien:
 
It's just a random formation that your mind perceives as a "face". We are "prewired" to recognize faces and anything that comes close to that pattern is going to be recognized as a "face". I also have one in the stucco stuff on my ceiling, but I'm pretty sure Martians didn't put it there.
 
Heavydutyguy

Might not be a face, but if you read my above post, and took the visual facts of the land formation into consideration, you have to see that it doesn't seem natural. Face or not.
 
LOL @ HeavyDuty's Martian Stucco Face!!!

Matt-- true there is nothing saying the all species have to look the same. However, there are certain things that, based on laws of the universe (physics and such) are bound to be ubiquitous. Bi-lateral symmetry would be one such thing. Certainly life forms COULD have horizontal symmetry, but unless you're floating in open space, there would be extreme disadvantages. If a creature is walking on a planet, what would be the point of having feet on top of you as well as on bottom.

This is just a long-winded analogy as to why, in my opinion, it is LIKELY that alien species would have physical similarities to humans.

BTW... if life evolved just as easily in all environments (extreme heat/cold, methane atmoshperes, tremendous gravitation, etc), then why didn't it evolve on other planets in our system? Instead, it only evolved on a planet with very moderate climates and abundant oxygen and nitrogen.
 
Panspermia is (very basically) the theory that life (earth life) evolved elsewhere and arrived on this planet through 'bacterial spores' in space.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Need advice. Heart transplant, now struggling with TRT?No energy
Replies
25
Views
5K
25homes
25homes
Richardbrown
Napsgear: 12 REASONS PEOPLE FAIL AT FITNESS
Replies
16
Views
4K
Tazz
Tazz
jasonhill800
Napsgear, Grow Massive Triceps with These Techniques
Replies
16
Views
4K
ballin2504
ballin2504
M
The necessity of bodybuilding in gaining self-confidence
Replies
4
Views
3K
RickRock13
RickRock13
~Vision~
Tren/Injection cough explained (Backed by a clinical studies)
Replies
4
Views
3K
MasonicBodybuilder
MasonicBodybuilder
Top Bottom