Dude.. Would "use TFSE" be an appropriate response?
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt... Maybe you DID know this topic has been discussed over and over and over and.......
And you were hoping that some definitive conclusion could be drawn about the use of t3 on a bulking cycle-- since the FSE turns up mixed thoughts..
Well, buddy, I've got some news for you.. This isn't a chemistry board.. If I say that A plus B will yield C, you can try it, and if it doesn't, you can say "fuck you." Too bad BBing isn't like this.. If you haven't realized it yet, BBing is one of THE most subjective topics there are to 'discuss.' I can give you an infinite # of examples, starting with "boron to increase testosterone" that came about in the 80's.. Guys literally SWORE by it.. Guess what? It doesn't do shit.. This is no different that the SAME clothing detergent, put in boxes of different colors, gets wildly different reviews on how well it brightens clothes.. The latter example of how psychology dominates subjective issues is a personal favorite of mine from Bill Roberts.
Anyway, some dude can come on here and say that he gained 30 lbs of muscle while going from 10% to 5% bf taking one sustanon/week along with 2-3 t3 tabs.. And you know what? There is absolutely NO way to say "you're full of shit.." IS he full of shit? Of course he is!!!.. But you can't prove it..
Back to the original topic.. (Again, I'm assuming that you REALIZE that this has been discussed 100's of times... and that you're looking for some, all-of-the-sudden, clear, pure, no question about it, type of answer..)
Well bro, I can tell you that you can take a pole, and you will find the EXACT same %'s of +'s, -'s and indifferents that were felt by the BBer's of yesterday, the day before, and a year or so ago..
Why? I've already explained why.. Because I can come on here and preach and preach that t3 will do nothing for you while on a bulking cycle.. And some idiot can come on and say "yes, it does.. I felt leaner while bulking.." and yada yada yada..
Now, here's where it gets foggy for some- being able to differentiate the shit from shinola. Here's where your logical reasoning skills have to come into play... You need to be able to rank statements according to their ability to be analytically scrutinized.. What do I mean? You need to be able to rank a journal publication above how some dude felt on a cycle.. You need to be able to read someone's opinion, and decide for yourself whether or not their reasoning is objective, and coherant, or, rather, whether it's a bunch of nonsence thrown together that has little or no logical or scientific support for the statement...
I suggest reading someone's post.. Then read some more of their posts.. YOu need to be able to tell if this person is credible or if this person is full of shit..
The latter is pure reasoning and critical thinking.. This, I cannot teach you... It can be developed! But I won't tell you where..
Andy