Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

sublinguals and liver damage

josenunes

New member
there are currently on the market (in Europe OTC) a lot of steroids such as dianabol,stanozonol, etc that are for sub lingual administration, some producers claim that they are not liver toxic because the route of administration is not oral.
Is this true?
 
cyclodextrin based sublinguals suppossedly pass directly into the bloodstream from the mucocus membranes under the tongue or between gum and lip.

while the liver detox's everything, the main problem with roids and the liver is 17aa modification which wouldnt be neccessary (or desirable) with SL

that said, I havent researched the topic and would like to hear from any who have
 
I would go as far to say there is a big GH boost because of the sublingual correlation and the pituitary glands location

Mav do an experiment and make us rich! :)
 
at the end of the experiment, the pituitary needs to be removed and examined for the results to be considered valid. cool of you to volunteer

- brr does the vivisection, digger is the anesthesiologist :evil:
 
I believe none oral steroids have little to no effect on the liver, since they pass through the blood directly.
 
Mavafanculo said:
at the end of the experiment, the pituitary needs to be removed and examined for the results to be considered valid. cool of you to volunteer

- brr does the vivisection, digger is the anesthesiologist :evil:
I will be standing by to record all info !
 
Check this company`s claims (I cut the name of the product because of the board rules):
"****** is just like Dianabol, in every way, but lacking the c17-alpha alkylation. But doesn’t this make it unable to survive being orally ingested? Well, yes, and no. If **** were taken in pill form, and swallowed, it would be rapidly destroyed by the liver. That’s why scientists at ****** have created *****to be administered in such a way as to avoid the liver entirely. It’s called “Sublingual Administration” and here’s how it works:

Sublingual means 'under the tongue' and refers to a method of administering substances via the mouth in such a way that those substances are completely and rapidly absorbed via the sublingual gland. The sublingual gland is a highly concentrated network of blood vessels under the tongue rather than through the digestive tract and ultimately ending up in the liver. The active ingredient is rapidly absorbed through the buccal mucosa under the tongue, and this allows ******to have direct access to your bloodstream; providing direct systemic administration of the same active ingredient found in Dianabol, but without the problem of elevating liver enzymes.

This method of administration also reduces the rate at which ***** converts to estrogen, as the aromatase enzyme is produced in the liver, and by avoiding primary interaction with it, some conversion to estrogen can be avoided. So ****will give you all of the positive effects of Dianabol, without the elevations in liver enzymes. This means ***** will produce an increase in nitrogen retention (thus promoting muscle growth), an decrease in cortisol production (*a major deterrent to muscle growth), an increase in circulating levels of the highly anabolic growth factor “IGF-1” and an increase in red blood cell count, which will aid in bringing more highly oxygenated blood to your muscles. All of this adds up to make ***** just as anabolic as Dianabol, but with far less side effects. In the end, Dianabol- the anabolic compound developed for athletes by athletes, has finally stepped into the next century- while keeping all of its original anabolic properties, but retaining none of its drawbacks.
"

All the good effects without the bad ones????? For me it seems to good to be true...
 
josenunes said:
an decrease in cortisol production ....

All the good effects without the bad ones????? For me it seems to good to be true...

the crappy grammer and the factual inaccuracy ^^ would make me suspicious....
 
Mavafanculo said:
the crappy grammer and the factual inaccuracy ^^ would make me suspicious....
the lab that makes this kind if product is well known in Europe , there are some lab test of their products that certify the compounds and dosages but I don't know if they do what they say...
 
Top Bottom