Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Steroids and the Law in Canada

GeneticMutation

New member
The following is a C&P post that I made on another forum (was drifting through the internet and signed up just to correct what a person said regarding steroid laws in Canada) and I thought I should post it here too for people who may be curious.

"I don't frequent Anabolex very much and I do realize that a low post count will not lend as much credibility to this post. That being said, I know the internet is a place where egos can flare up and people tend to take things personally so as a disclaimer, I'm not attacking you Bakes

I beleive you have interpereted the CDSA incorrectly. Specifically, the section 4 with regards to 4(2). The correct way of reading it is as follows:

4. (1) Possesson od Substance-Except as authorized under the regulations, no person shall possess a substance included in Schedule I, II, or III.

(2) Obtaining Substance - No person shall seek or obtain

(a) a substance included in Schedule I, II, III, or IV, or

(b) an authorization to obtain a substance inculded in Schedule I, II, III, or IV

from a practitioner, unless the person discloses to the practitioner particulars relating to the acquisition to obtain such substances, from any other practitioner within the preceding thirty days.

You'll notice a seemingly small difference. Where after 4(2)(b) you had "from a practitioner.." in the same sentance, it should not be this way.

Whereas you wrote (a) and (b) referring them as seperate and distinct from each other, they are actually inclusive (notice the ", or"at the end of subsection (b).

The way you wrote the section means that nobody shall seek or obtain the mentioned substances, nor shall they seek or obtain an authorization from a practitioner.

The way it should be interpreted is: nobody shall seek or obtain the mentioned substances or an authorization to obtain them from a practitioner unless the person discloses to the practitioner particulars relating to the acquisition to obtain such substances, from any other practitioner within the preceding thirty days.

So in basic terms, using steroids as an example, S.4(a) means don't go to your doctor and ask for a bottle of test or TRT injections. S.4(b) means don't ask for a prescription for a bottle of test.

For both, the exception (unless) you tell your doctor why you want them and that you disclose if you have already obtained them from another doctor before.

The above section illustrates double-doctoring. It is to prevent people from going to one doctor getting a legitimate prescription for a controlled substance and visiting another doctor and getting another prescription. This stops people from abusing and selling schedule IV drugs, which are for the most part, barbituates and benzodiazepines (painkillers, muscle relaxants, steroids, other stuff that you would have to be a pharmacist to know)

To put it simply: Steroids are not exactly illegal. They are controlled substances, just like many other prescription drugs and drugs commonly administered in hospitals (Morphine, Codeine etc.)

For the rest of the CDSA you've listed, you've listed correctly.

But everyone wants to know the answer to the question, "What happens if I'm in possession of anabolic steroids?"

Answer? Nothing. Simple posession of barbituates, benziodiazepans and Anabolic Steroids - is not illegal. Buying them off of the street or at your local gym is NOT illegal. Well, maybe. We'll get to that in a bit.

What is illegal? Everything else. Trafficking, Production etc.

Buying juice overseas? Illegal. Trafficking. (Bringing into country)
Will lanything happen? Depends. I'm not the detective with an ego to boost on something minor like a small supply of a Schedule IV drug. Neither are most others. Keep in mind it IS illegal and like some people, you CAN get the short end of the stick.

Selling or even giving away juice? Illegal. Trafficking.

Posession of MASS quantities of juice? Illegal. The police will try to nail you with posession for purposes of trafficking.

One important note : NEVER underestimate the audacity of peace officers. There is NO statute of limitations on how much drugs constitutes as posession for purposes of trafficking. You could (hypothetically speaking) be charged if a cop finds 10 amps of Test-E. Though the burden will be on the crown to PROVE that you are trafficking drugs. Needless to say, with even a legal aid lawyer you should be able to walk as no credible authority will swear that 10 amps is way more than what is commonly used on cycle. While you may walk, you could set yourself up for potential headaches. Keep use on the down low. Don't drive around with a syringe and an amp on your front seat.

In addition, keep orders small and never possess any more than 1 full cycle on hand, this includes stuff you leave in the care of other people.

Hope I've helped."
 
In addition, here is some backup from a credible source (Waterloo Regional Police):

Possession
Having in possession means having in personal possession, having in possession or custody of another person or having in any place for their use or benefit. If one person of a group has something in their possession, with the knowledge and consent of other members of the group, every member of the group is deemed to have possession.

Section 4(1) of the CDSA prohibits anyone from possessing any substance in Schedules I, II or III. There are certain people, such as researchers and police officers, who are permitted to possess these substances under certain circumstances. The sentence for possession of a controlled substance depends on the schedule to which the substance belongs and the amount of the substance. The maximum sentence for simple possession is seven years.


| Double-Doctoring
Double-Doctoring is seeking or obtaining, or seeking or obtaining authorization to obtain any substance in Schedules I, II, III or IV from a practitioner without disclosing the particulars relating to the acquisition or authorization to obtain such substances from any other practitioner within the past 30 days.

In practical terms, this means obtaining, or attempting to obtain, drugs or prescriptions from more than one doctor. Section 4(2) of the CDSA prohibits double-doctoring. The sentence depends on the schedule to which the substance belongs and ranges to a maximum of seven years.


Website is http://www.wrps.on.ca/drugs_law.html for everyone's consultation.
 
well i was in a car accident a 6 weeks ago and the cops found 60 amps of test prop and 400 5mg naps and the investigating cop told me to pick it up from the police station if i want to claim it, i was going to as soon as i'm back on my feet, think it's a good idea or should i let it slide?
 
JohnnyWest said:
well i was in a car accident a 6 weeks ago and the cops found 60 amps of test prop and 400 5mg naps and the investigating cop told me to pick it up from the police station if i want to claim it, i was going to as soon as i'm back on my feet, think it's a good idea or should i let it slide?

good question.....where is the canadian "intent to distribute" section?
 
JohnnyWest said:
well i was in a car accident a 6 weeks ago and the cops found 60 amps of test prop and 400 5mg naps and the investigating cop told me to pick it up from the police station if i want to claim it, i was going to as soon as i'm back on my feet, think it's a good idea or should i let it slide?


Depends where u live.. If its Van go get it .. they rip up small bags of down like nothing.. If they already found it in your car because of an accident an had probable cause to search then they would have already charged you.. But if u wanna be better safe then sorry just fuk it take it as a loss.
 
JohnnyWest said:
well i was in a car accident a 6 weeks ago and the cops found 60 amps of test prop and 400 5mg naps and the investigating cop told me to pick it up from the police station if i want to claim it, i was going to as soon as i'm back on my feet, think it's a good idea or should i let it slide?


It's tough to say really. Like I said previously, there is NO guideline on how much exactly constitutes as trafficking. the amps probably wouldn't stand out as too much; however, the 400 naps may be a different story. It might be seen as 400 doses rather than something like say 57 doses of 35 milligrams (7/day).

However, i just found an interesting piece of case law that applies here. The following is from pg. 1767, Section 5 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act from Martin's Annual Criminal Code:

"Where the transportation by the accused of the narcotic is incidental to the accused's own personal use of the narcotic as distinct from transportation as part of a transaction involving others, then the accused does not commit the offence under this subsection"

Case cited was R. v. Harrington and Scosky, [1964] 1 C.C.C. 189, 41 C.R. 75

Which basically means that transportation for personal use is not constituted as trafficking.

My analysis of your situation is that the police officer that confiscated your gear did so on reasonable grounds in order to ascertain the nature of the drugs. The amp may say Test prop, but who knows? There could be Heroin inside.

If the cop told you to come to the police station to claim it, your probably in the clear. The police wouldn't bother setting up a type of "sting" because if they truely believed you were in possession of a substance prohibited or were trafficking, they would have already been at your door and arrested you. They would've already had all the evidence they needed to arrest&charge you. Waiting for you to claim it proves nothing - even if the amps were something like heroin, possession would've already been proved upon discovering the drugs - even if they weren't yours to begin with anyways as possession doesn't mean that you necessarily "own" the goods. Yes, looking after drugs "for a friend" is possession.

If you do decide to get them back, bear in mind that police will NEVER just give you a package, tell you to have a nice day and let you be on your merry way. They will most assuredly ask you questions as to how you obtained them, where you obtained them, what is in them exactly, etc.

I would probably just let it be, myself. I wouldn't want a red flag on my name even if i got the drugs back (if it isn't there already!).

One more note to bear in mind: I am not giving you legal advice here bro. Just showing you what is written in the code and citing case law and offering my own interperetation and opinions. I am neither a lawyer, nor a police officer. Still a student. That being said, it NEVER hurts to consult an attorney regarding anything with the law. There is no real counterpart in Canada like Rick Collins Esq. and because steroids are not really an issue in Canada, there are no true "Steroid" experts so I wouldn't be suprised if different lawyers offer different opinions.

Take care.
 
Top Bottom