M meat06 New member Mar 20, 2011 #1 this will be my second cycle 6'2 205 12% i was wondering what would be better or if either one would should any less or more results/sides wk1-10 600cyp wk wk1-10 600eq wk VS wk1-12 480cyp wk wk1-12 480eq wk
this will be my second cycle 6'2 205 12% i was wondering what would be better or if either one would should any less or more results/sides wk1-10 600cyp wk wk1-10 600eq wk VS wk1-12 480cyp wk wk1-12 480eq wk
jmat2407 New member Mar 20, 2011 #2 meat06 said: this will be my second cycle 6'2 205 12% i was wondering what would be better or if either one would should any less or more results/sides wk1-10 600cyp wk wk1-10 600eq wk VS wk1-12 480cyp wk wk1-12 480eq wk Click to expand... I'm pretty sure you should run EQ for a minimum of 12 weeks.
meat06 said: this will be my second cycle 6'2 205 12% i was wondering what would be better or if either one would should any less or more results/sides wk1-10 600cyp wk wk1-10 600eq wk VS wk1-12 480cyp wk wk1-12 480eq wk Click to expand... I'm pretty sure you should run EQ for a minimum of 12 weeks.
DaBangEm New member Mar 20, 2011 #3 Jmat's right if you don't rub it for a minimum of 12 weeks there is no point to it at all. And if you ate stacking like that why increase the dosage of your test From 500/wk? Just curious, it's not wrong to do it like that.
Jmat's right if you don't rub it for a minimum of 12 weeks there is no point to it at all. And if you ate stacking like that why increase the dosage of your test From 500/wk? Just curious, it's not wrong to do it like that.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
