Stacking vs Single steroid cycles.

[Mr_Pincushonass]

I have read everywhere that there is no scientific evedence that stacking steroids gives better results than taking one steroid alone. If this is true, why not take them all at different times, say 3 months apart.

Say you wanted to do a test/deca/dbol cycle and you first did the dbol alone, then the test alone, then the deca alone, taking clomid after each one and spacing them 3 months apart.

 

[tyguy]

are you serious?

 

[JibbyJabba]

be weary of the claim "no scientific evidence"... I mean, the tobacco industry still exists based upon the fact that there is "no scientific evidence" that consistently and definitively shows that smoking causes lung cancer... but, you would have to be quite fucking stupid to claim that cigarettes don't cause cancer. My point being, it takes a whole helluva lot of data for something to be scientifically proven to a point where it is universally accepted. But, as far as stacking goes, it definitely will give you better gains than single-roid cycles. Read Huck's post on Type I and II steroids... this will shed some light on why this is...

 

[robsatx]

Where do we find the post from huck on this?

Please advise . . .

 

[not quite ripe]

i know some young guys who only do singles at a time becuse they say the side effects are worse with stackes (moodswings, acne, ect...)

 

[BrettB1]

thats what I was wondering, How much more effective would a dbol, sustanon, deca cycle be than a dbol, sustanon cycle

 

[Inhibitor13]

Each steroid works hand in hand with one another....

 

[steelmass]

brettb1 at the low end there is no difference. At the high end there is a huge difference. There is a law of dimishing returns for all things. Most say around 1g for Test. What if you want to push the envelope? Go 1g test and 1g EQ. More? Then throw in 1g Tren. At a beginners level just go straight test.

 

[BrettB1]

thanks steelmass, I appreciate the info "law of diminishing returns" nice