Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
Ever heard of Michael Bellesiles? He's a historian at Emory University in Atlanta. He's also the author of "Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture." His book received the Bancroft Prize, the most prestigious award in the writing of American history.
The gist of Bellesiles' book is that "America's gun culture is an invented tradition." He says guns were far less important to early American culture than is commonly believed. He backs this claim up with historical records.
Trouble is, as the Boston Globe and National Review point out, Bellesiles' sources are a little fishy. Some of the most important statements Bellesiles makes in his book are based on data that just don't exist.
What data, you ask? National Review's Melissa Seckora has a prime example. Bellesiles claims that he counted guns in probate records of the estates of people who died between 1849 and 1850, and between 1858 and 1859 in San Francisco. But everybody knows that those records don't exist anymore--because they were destroyed in the 1906 earthquake and fire that ravaged San Francisco.
Now there's been some movement in this case. The head of Emory University's history department has demanded that Bellesiles write a detailed defense of his book! James Melton said, "What is important is that he defend himself and the integrity of his scholarship immediately.
Depending on his response, the university will respond appropriately. If there is prima facie evidence of scholarly misconduct, the university has to conduct a thorough investigation. Whether it be a purely internal inquiry, or the university brings in distinguished scholars in the field, will depend on how Michael responds."
Bellesiles promises that he will publish his defense of his work in a future newsletter of the Organization of American Historians.
How about that, folks? I must say that I’m impressed. Emory University, a true leftist haven, has won back some of my respect for demanding accountability from an obviously anti-gun leftist historian.
I’m sure they’re thrilled.
(Original story sources)
http://www.nationalreview.com/daily/nr100401.shtml
http://www.nationalreview.com/15oct01/seckora101501.shtml
Taken from Neal Boortz's site: http://www.boortz.com/nealznuz.htm
The gist of Bellesiles' book is that "America's gun culture is an invented tradition." He says guns were far less important to early American culture than is commonly believed. He backs this claim up with historical records.
Trouble is, as the Boston Globe and National Review point out, Bellesiles' sources are a little fishy. Some of the most important statements Bellesiles makes in his book are based on data that just don't exist.
What data, you ask? National Review's Melissa Seckora has a prime example. Bellesiles claims that he counted guns in probate records of the estates of people who died between 1849 and 1850, and between 1858 and 1859 in San Francisco. But everybody knows that those records don't exist anymore--because they were destroyed in the 1906 earthquake and fire that ravaged San Francisco.
Now there's been some movement in this case. The head of Emory University's history department has demanded that Bellesiles write a detailed defense of his book! James Melton said, "What is important is that he defend himself and the integrity of his scholarship immediately.
Depending on his response, the university will respond appropriately. If there is prima facie evidence of scholarly misconduct, the university has to conduct a thorough investigation. Whether it be a purely internal inquiry, or the university brings in distinguished scholars in the field, will depend on how Michael responds."
Bellesiles promises that he will publish his defense of his work in a future newsletter of the Organization of American Historians.
How about that, folks? I must say that I’m impressed. Emory University, a true leftist haven, has won back some of my respect for demanding accountability from an obviously anti-gun leftist historian.
I’m sure they’re thrilled.
(Original story sources)
http://www.nationalreview.com/daily/nr100401.shtml
http://www.nationalreview.com/15oct01/seckora101501.shtml
Taken from Neal Boortz's site: http://www.boortz.com/nealznuz.htm
Maybe a nice Mossberg home defense type model. Nothing says fun like water jugs exploding after being hit with some big ass slugs.
