Sarms vs aas

[Oxbow]

Hey guys,
I plan to run Sarms for my next cycle (ostarine & S4). But on this board I see a lot of people recommanding to take SARMSs instead og steroids like Sarms were as strong as AAS...It seems just too beautiful to be true to me. (A steroid with no sides)

I know sarms are Elite Fitness sponsors but please can we be just honest one time : How strong is Ostarine to build mass ? IMO they are great because of no side effects but can't be compared to AAS right ?

Next thing, I've heard that it could be a more strong generation of SARMS in the future ?

 

[Arabian]

Sarms are NOT as strong as AAS and never will be. AAS will give you the results you are looking for guaranteed as Sarms is just a way to complement a AAS cycle.

 

[dylangemelli]

I don't think anyone is trying to provide the misconception that sarms are as strong as aas... The way it is correctly and accurately stated is that sarms have steroid LIKE beneftits without the negative side effects but should NOT be confused as being as strong as steroids... Sarms are the enhancers for your performance enhancers... they can take your cycle to the next level and they can help to not only maintain but add to your gains in between cycles.... your shutdown you experience with them is minimal at best and the side effects are very few as they are non-methylated... They are not as strong as every day steroids but when you factor in all the pros against the extremely few on on the cons, it's with excellent reason that they come so highly recommended...

 

[WolfpackAlpha]

Scientifically, for example, S-4 is 1/3rd as strong as testosterone at binding to the androgen receptor. It's very powerful. When combined with Osta/Cardarine, you'll get a very potent, steroid-like, effect. If anything out there compares to real gear, sarms and pro-steroids are it.

In reality, there are 2 types of cycles you can do with sarms: 1) sole-cycles: where sarms are the base 2) hybrid-cycles: where sarms are a compliment to a cycle.

Here is some reading for you:
S-4 (Andarine) ? a comparison to Winstrol - Evolutionary.org
Ostarine - as compared to Anabolic Steroids - Evolutionary.org
Andarine (S-4) - Evolutionary.org
GW-501516 Facts - Evolutionary.org
Ostarine (MK-2866) - Evolutionary.org

 

[RickRock13]

Steroids and sarms each have their place. Sarms are not as strong as AAS but excellent and best used as a bridge between AAS cycles in my opinion.

 

[hurricane]

steriod are better mass builders but sarms are right there with steriods for cutters and recomp cycles with less sides of course.Dont forget the bridging and ability to use in pct that sarms products provide also due to low supression.