Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
R-ala
- Thread starter OfimNedu
- Start date
Burning_Inside
Elite Mentor
"11.11mg of racemic ALA per gram(g) of carbohydrates, and 3.7mg of R-ALA per gram(g) of carbohydrates; AS LONG AS the carb content of the meal
is kept < 108g. If the carb content of the meal goes beyond 108g the R-ALA loses effectiveness at an ever increasing rate, but still manages to be 55% more effective(mg per mg) than racemic after a single 280g carb load.To use an analogy, R-ALA is like a scalpel while ALA is like a kitchen Knife. They will both work, but for cutting I would go with R-ALA, and
for bulking I’d go with racemic ALA because of the cost." ~Fonz
is kept < 108g. If the carb content of the meal goes beyond 108g the R-ALA loses effectiveness at an ever increasing rate, but still manages to be 55% more effective(mg per mg) than racemic after a single 280g carb load.To use an analogy, R-ALA is like a scalpel while ALA is like a kitchen Knife. They will both work, but for cutting I would go with R-ALA, and
for bulking I’d go with racemic ALA because of the cost." ~Fonz
macrophage69alpha
New member
sawastea said:
which is in glucorellR
a note with respect to efficacy- while the 3 to 1 glucose clearance may hold for many.
one of the many benefits that glucorellR provides, that racemic (normal ALA) does not, is lowering of plasma insulin.
a good read on the issue
http://www.glucorellr.com/DrMatt.htm
Transporter
New member
thats why u buy r-ala!macrophage69alpha said:
