Orignally posted by LONE_AZ
The key word is not subseptible. It does not mean it can not return. I had mine removed about a year ago by a plastic surgeon. Glandular tissue and all. The last thing I was told is the while I may not be as subseptable it may come back. Sure enough it came back. The reoccurrence rates are as follows.
Liposuction only without direct recision 45%-55%
Liposution with direct recision 8%-13%
I would think the odds go way up if you use anabolics.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by LONE_AZ
INTRODUCTION: A number of techniques are available for the correction of gynecomastia. Nonscarring sparing methods are preferred, and the minimally invasive technique is to use liposuction for the gland and the fatty tissue exclusively. In this retrospective study we present our experience with a combination of liposuction and subsequent resection of the remaining gland. METHODS: Sixty-two patients (112 breasts) were surgically treated for gynecomastia from January 1996 and September 2000. From 1996 to 1997 all patients suffering from gynecomastia grade Simon I-II were treated by the method described by Rosenberg and Stark, which is exclusively suction of the fatty and glandular tissue. In a retrospective chart study a high recurrence rate was found in these patients. Subsequently we changed our technique to liposuction of the fatty tissue followed by sharp excision of the glandular tissue through the incision made for the liposuction cannula in the submammary fold. RESULTS: Suction alone was not sufficient to remove the glandular tissue; the rate of recurrence after suction was 35%. When sharp resection of the glandular tissue was carried out after the liposuction the recurrence rate dropped to under 10%. In total our complication rate was 50% including minor sequelae. The most frequent complication was unacceptable scarring of the nipple-areola complex. Hypesthesia of the nipple-areola occurred in 13.4% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of liposuction and resection of the glandular tissue is a minimally invasive correction that can be used in all cases of gynecomastia grade Simon I-II.
PMID: 11715623 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
crash3837 said:So whats wrong with removing the whole gland and everything?
Peyomp said:I had gyno as a teen, and they removed the whole lumpy deposit, as well as the fat. Yes there is a hollow spot behind the nipple. No, it doesn't bother me. Same story for a friend that had it. As for recurrance... I don't know. But I'll be your case study once I start my first cycle, of test.
mvmaxx said:
There has actually been several people on this board that have had gyno surgery and have had it reoccur.
Peyomp said:I'm not going through that shit again. Pain, being disabled, numb nipples for years, risk of general anesthesia
mvmaxx said:
Really??Most bros that have posted here have said it's a relatively painless process. Granted, there's some swelling and bruising but they say they were good in about a month. "Numb nipples for years???" ...scary
Describe your ordeal. It only helps to inform others.
-Was it a general surgeon or plastic surgeon?
-How old were you?
-How long were you in the hospital for?
Iwan2bsolid2 said:my chest looks nice when I'm fucking cold and nips are hard.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










