Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
quality on IP"s Steroids
- Thread starter Bettin
- Start date
Radical Ice
Member
If we are speaking of the same IP, there's lab results posted at http://anabolicboard.com/
Generally, his winny and d-bol seem to be the most consistent as far as dosage is concerned. A-bombs always seem to be questionable.
Generally, his winny and d-bol seem to be the most consistent as far as dosage is concerned. A-bombs always seem to be questionable.
Skullfucked
New member
Pics of his tabs are bad idea for obvious reasons (ie being noticed by the wrong people). They are plain, round, with no score marks.Bettin said:
Serenity Head
New member
I wouldn't exactly call it a pharm. company...more like a home brewery. At the prices even if the dosage is half what he claims it is generally worth the price.
Japanese machine
New member
People still use EYEPEE? damn!
good luck and keep your fingers crossed
good luck and keep your fingers crossed
DangerousGrounds
New member
I'll tell ya what the susp/prop is strongest shit I ever took.
instant boner fuel!
On the downside i did experience lots of flu symptoms after injects but still love it.
instant boner fuel!
On the downside i did experience lots of flu symptoms after injects but still love it.
DangerousGrounds
New member
Bettin said:
no
strengthfiend
New member
Always liked the products!
Radical Ice
Member
I don't know how much clout Brock Strasser carries around here, but here's an article he wrote for T-Mag...
IP Lab Tests Are In!
"In the past, I've criticized IP (International Pharmaceuticals, the top steroid bootlegger) for making gear that was either mislabeled or just shoddy. I'd like to correct some of my errors now. A reader sent me some lab assays done on IP products via San Rafael Chemical Services and while IP's label isn't always accurate, he's damn close much of the time. Recent assays via SRCS have demonstrated the following (and I'm posting a few of the scans, not all of them as space won't permit me to do such):
IP's Equipose tested out to 143mg/ml boldenone undecylenate per SRCS analysis.
IP's Testosterone Cypionate tested out to 176mg/ml Testosterone cypionate per SRCS analysis.
IP's 50mg Dbol Tablets tested out to 57.4mg of methandrosteneolone per SRCS analysis.
IP's 50mg Winstrol Tablets tested out to 46.9mg of stanozolol per SRCS analysis.
So far, this makes IP's stuff as good or about as good as most of the Mexican veterinary stuff.
IP's "Sustanon version 1" (see scan) tested out to be 54.1mg of Testosterone propionate and 206mg of Testosterone cypionate per ml. So while it has a little more Testosterone in it than an amp of Omnadren or Sustanon, it does only have two esters as opposed to four. No biggie here; the net effect with IP's stuff is the same.
But, another sample of IP's "Sustanon version 2" (see scan) contained 96.5mg of Testosterone propionate and 205mg of Testosterone undecanoate per ml. So while you're getting a lot of bang for the buck, the consistency issue is something I'd watch. That and the large amount of benzyl alcohol IP uses to "sterilize" his stuff which can cause some pretty sore injection site reactions.
However, all of the microbiological assays I've seen of IP's injectables, real assays from real companies, not some half-witted knucklehead making the stuff up on his computer in his "lab," have shown next to no coliform bacteria, which to me means IP is making clean (albeit somewhat painful) gear. Way to go IP, good job.
I didn't much care for IP before and I'm the first to admit my opinion was based on people supplying me information that was, shall we say, less than honest. I've learned something here: many of the people trashing IP (and other booters) have a vested interest in doing so because they don't carry or can't get IP stuff to make a buck on it.
So here's what I'd suggest all of you do: Next time some loudmouth claims so-and-so's product is bogus or whatever, don't ask, demand to see a real lab assay from a real lab like SRCS or tell the mouthy bastard to shut the heck up. "
IP Lab Tests Are In!
"In the past, I've criticized IP (International Pharmaceuticals, the top steroid bootlegger) for making gear that was either mislabeled or just shoddy. I'd like to correct some of my errors now. A reader sent me some lab assays done on IP products via San Rafael Chemical Services and while IP's label isn't always accurate, he's damn close much of the time. Recent assays via SRCS have demonstrated the following (and I'm posting a few of the scans, not all of them as space won't permit me to do such):
IP's Equipose tested out to 143mg/ml boldenone undecylenate per SRCS analysis.
IP's Testosterone Cypionate tested out to 176mg/ml Testosterone cypionate per SRCS analysis.
IP's 50mg Dbol Tablets tested out to 57.4mg of methandrosteneolone per SRCS analysis.
IP's 50mg Winstrol Tablets tested out to 46.9mg of stanozolol per SRCS analysis.
So far, this makes IP's stuff as good or about as good as most of the Mexican veterinary stuff.
IP's "Sustanon version 1" (see scan) tested out to be 54.1mg of Testosterone propionate and 206mg of Testosterone cypionate per ml. So while it has a little more Testosterone in it than an amp of Omnadren or Sustanon, it does only have two esters as opposed to four. No biggie here; the net effect with IP's stuff is the same.
But, another sample of IP's "Sustanon version 2" (see scan) contained 96.5mg of Testosterone propionate and 205mg of Testosterone undecanoate per ml. So while you're getting a lot of bang for the buck, the consistency issue is something I'd watch. That and the large amount of benzyl alcohol IP uses to "sterilize" his stuff which can cause some pretty sore injection site reactions.
However, all of the microbiological assays I've seen of IP's injectables, real assays from real companies, not some half-witted knucklehead making the stuff up on his computer in his "lab," have shown next to no coliform bacteria, which to me means IP is making clean (albeit somewhat painful) gear. Way to go IP, good job.
I didn't much care for IP before and I'm the first to admit my opinion was based on people supplying me information that was, shall we say, less than honest. I've learned something here: many of the people trashing IP (and other booters) have a vested interest in doing so because they don't carry or can't get IP stuff to make a buck on it.
So here's what I'd suggest all of you do: Next time some loudmouth claims so-and-so's product is bogus or whatever, don't ask, demand to see a real lab assay from a real lab like SRCS or tell the mouthy bastard to shut the heck up. "
DangerousGrounds
New member
IMO
110cc's of susp/prop, 200mgs for about under $2.00 a cc is not bad at all and goes a looooong ways.
If you don't like it and have lots of extra $$$ I say go elsewhere but many don't have the $$$ and have had fantastic results of his shit.
Some say fake or wrong shit but I have been happy with what I tried.
110cc's of susp/prop, 200mgs for about under $2.00 a cc is not bad at all and goes a looooong ways.
If you don't like it and have lots of extra $$$ I say go elsewhere but many don't have the $$$ and have had fantastic results of his shit.
Some say fake or wrong shit but I have been happy with what I tried.
Similar threads
