Keep it beefy
New member
Hey guys, just had a quick question for any of you counterfeit experts out there...my primo looks exactly like
http://www.anabolex.com/modules.php...&file=index&do=showpic&pid=682&orderby=titleA
and
http://www.anabolex.com/modules.php...&file=index&do=showpic&pid=681&orderby=titleA
except that in mine, one portion reads AEM:E.M.36.558....not AEM:E.N.36.558 as seen above. i can't find any in that particular gallery that have an M rather than an n....is this not a big deal? my attention was drawn to there legitimancy straight away because of the fact that the labels peel off relatively easily, and the labels are square edged, not rounded. but, i guess, the gallery shows those as legit, even though they have all the signs of fakes. also, the expiration date and batch number, as you'll see, are printed at what appears to be the same time the label was. they aren't stamped on as they normally are with other AS. this is all kind of sketchy. what do you guys think?
http://www.anabolex.com/modules.php...&file=index&do=showpic&pid=682&orderby=titleA
and
http://www.anabolex.com/modules.php...&file=index&do=showpic&pid=681&orderby=titleA
except that in mine, one portion reads AEM:E.M.36.558....not AEM:E.N.36.558 as seen above. i can't find any in that particular gallery that have an M rather than an n....is this not a big deal? my attention was drawn to there legitimancy straight away because of the fact that the labels peel off relatively easily, and the labels are square edged, not rounded. but, i guess, the gallery shows those as legit, even though they have all the signs of fakes. also, the expiration date and batch number, as you'll see, are printed at what appears to be the same time the label was. they aren't stamped on as they normally are with other AS. this is all kind of sketchy. what do you guys think?

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










