Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

Power, Terror, Peace, and War A moderate view

Y_lifter

New member
Power, Terror, Peace, and War ........ A moderate view

I saw this dude on a c span book review dealio and it was a good
Moderate view of current world events.. Just ordered it..
Comments on him ?


By Walter Russell Mead

Henry A. Kissinger Senior Fellow in U.S. Foreign Policy
Council on Foreign Relations

In Power, Terror, Peace, and War, Council Fellow Walter Russell Mead, one of the most original writers on U.S. foreign policy, provides a fascinating and timely account of the Bush administration's foreign policy and its current grand strategy for the world.

Mead analyzes America's historical approach to the world, which he describes as not perfect, but reasonably moral and reasonably practical on the whole. He examines the explosive foreign policy of the Bush administration and the uproar it has caused at home and abroad. Bush, according to Mead, is often strategically right but tactically at fault in his attempts to lead a divided nation--and a divided coalition of allies--in a dangerous struggle against ruthless enemies.

The mass terror attacks of 2001 changed the political and strategic problems facing American foreign policy, Mead explains. Despair and decay in the Arab world now present America and its allies with an extraordinarily difficult challenge. The accelerating collapse of civilized life in broad reaches of Africa--and the looming disasters of a similar kind in Central Asia--threatens to create lawless, violent zones where terrorism can thrive, and weapons of mass destruction and biological and chemical weapons can proliferate.

Mead further describes why key American alliances have frayed and why the Bush administration's pronouncements and actions have ignited the most acrimonious domestic political battles over foreign policy in this country since the Vietnam War. Mead closes with a rigorous assessment of both Bush and his critics, and describes the urgent steps the United States must take lest casualties in the war on terror mount and the war itself spin out of control. He proposes a new approach to the war that can rebuild domestic and international support for a tough antiterror policy, outlines a new initiative for the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, and recommends sweeping changes for reforming international institutions, including the United Nations Security Council.

Power, Terror, Peace, and War is a clear, concise guide to some of the most pressing issues before us, today and for the foreseeable future.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Walter Russell Mead is the Henry A. Kissinger Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations and is one of the country's leading students of American foreign policy. His last book, Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World (Alfred A. Knopf), was widely hailed by reviewers, historians and diplomats as an important study that will change the way Americans and others think about American foreign policy. Among several honors and prizes, Special Providence received the Lionel Gelber Award (which the Economist calls "the world's most important prize for non-fiction") for the best book in English on international relations in 2002. The Italian translation won the Premio Acqui Storia awarded to the most important historical book published in Italian.

ISBN # 1-4000-4237-2;
 
Last edited:
You know what has lead to the fall of every great power?
 
Milo Hobgoblin said:
Something analagous to Barney the Dinosaur becoming popular with children?
Good answer and there is a large amount of antidotal evidence to your claim but it's not the answer I was hitting for.

Starting wars.

Great Britan, The Soviet Union, France, The Roman Empire, The Ottomans...all precipitated their varied collpases with war as the preciptous event.
 
Japan, Germany, Italy, France, Brits
Still standing..

Not as powerful as they used to be, but still there with influence..

Maybe that's the outcome of the future for us.. Being less powerful and letting someone else be the cops.. China ? EU ?
 
WODIN said:
Good answer and there is a large amount of antidotal evidence to your claim but it's not the answer I was hitting for.

Starting wars.

Great Britan, The Soviet Union, France, The Roman Empire, The Ottomans...all precipitated their varied collpases with war as the preciptous event.

Jane, you ignorant, misguided slut.

Wars are symptoms, precipitious events, not causes.


The 'downfalls' are direct results of resource depletion and the need for open markets for surplus industrial goods. The entity can no longer sustain itself with its own resources, it must there by have open channels of trade with any and all of its potential suppliers/customers of goods. Lacking that, its war time to create the market favorable for surplus goods and nearly devoid of regulation.

Ex: Spanish american war was a direct result of the need to open up the Pacific. McKinley's quest for the Philipines (read: slaughter) and Hawaii as gateways to the East wre for economic reasons ONLY. Cuba? The Secretary of the navy (teddy the walrus) was handing out contracts and even vouchers for land parcels BEFORE the spanish capitulated. Free the cuban people. BWYAYAHAHAHAHA. We installed our navy and THE SAME SPANIARDS THAT WE KICKED OUT to run the government.

Both the first AND second world wars were joined by the US only after it became an economic necessity. Were they 'good' wars? er... yes. Did they bring about their desired economic effect? (retorical question)
 
^
powerterrorpeace.jpg


I'm Half way thru this book.
Great historical perspective as to why we are so aligned with the british.
How we took over the role of global Architects from them as their empire resolved.

Explains the means we use, hard power, soft power etc to get the world to do what we want.. Great for anyone that wants to understand how we got here and where we are and should be going..
Most of it is thinking "Inside the box" though if you are the type to not..

As to the middle east, an excerpt..

http://www.thinkingpeace.com/pages/arts2/arts179.html
 
Top Bottom