Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
tuc biscuit
New member
there had better be some interesting stuff posted here for when I get back from work or I will be so upset 
post any intersting stuff here
- Thread starter tuc biscuit
- Start date
Dante Alighieri
New member
The average male produces more than 100 litres of sperm in his life time.
Fragadelic
New member
Venus is the only planet that rotates clockwise
gotmilk
New member
Woman finds webcam under desk
Pointed straight up her skirt...
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- An Orange County Fire Department employee is supposed to protect people's privacy, but police say he violated a female employee by using a small web camera to spy on her. Now, the information systems administrator has resigned from his job.
Police say Hector Ray Valle (photo left) used a web camera at the Orange County Fire Department to watch the female employee from under a desk.
Fortunately, the employee noticed it. She was at her desk and she either dropped something or bumped her leg and looked underneath the desk. What she found was a camera and, when she took a closer look, realized it was pointed right at her, installed to look right up her skirt.
Valle was described in his personnel file as somebody who "earns trust and loyalty" while overseeing the entire Orange County Fire Department's computer systems.
Perhaps that trust went too far.
"It was really sophisticated where he could actually transmit wirelessly or through a cable network and I believe that's what he was trying to do," says Carlos Torres, Orange County Sheriff's Department.
Detectives retrieved the camera, but never got a word out of Valle, who resigned from his $67,000 a year job, immediately.
Valle, they say, knew what he was doing. He'd been working in the county's computer department since 1993. And, prior to that, he worked as a communications specialist in the Army during the first Gulf war.
"Anywhere, he would have access anywhere to be able to transmit any live footage from that web cam," explains Torres.
Whether or not he had transmitted it, detectives don't know.
The fire department has refused to comment and, when asked by Channel 9 about Valle, denied that anyone by that name was in any trouble.
While detectives work towards an arrest for attempted voyeurism, they say it's a scary reminder, that you never know who's watching.
"Just be aware of your surroundings; you're really not safe anywhere," says Torres.
Valle has been in trouble once before. He was arrested in 2000 for domestic battery against his wife. When reached about these latest accusations, he had no comment.
Detectives say, as soon as they're done with the case, they'll forward it to the State Attorney's Office to press charges. Since they don't have any proof that the images were transmitted, they can only arrest Valle for attempted voyeurism, a second-degree misdemeanor.
http://www.wftv.com/news/3328543/detail.html
Pointed straight up her skirt...
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. -- An Orange County Fire Department employee is supposed to protect people's privacy, but police say he violated a female employee by using a small web camera to spy on her. Now, the information systems administrator has resigned from his job.
Police say Hector Ray Valle (photo left) used a web camera at the Orange County Fire Department to watch the female employee from under a desk.
Fortunately, the employee noticed it. She was at her desk and she either dropped something or bumped her leg and looked underneath the desk. What she found was a camera and, when she took a closer look, realized it was pointed right at her, installed to look right up her skirt.
Valle was described in his personnel file as somebody who "earns trust and loyalty" while overseeing the entire Orange County Fire Department's computer systems.
Perhaps that trust went too far.
"It was really sophisticated where he could actually transmit wirelessly or through a cable network and I believe that's what he was trying to do," says Carlos Torres, Orange County Sheriff's Department.
Detectives retrieved the camera, but never got a word out of Valle, who resigned from his $67,000 a year job, immediately.
Valle, they say, knew what he was doing. He'd been working in the county's computer department since 1993. And, prior to that, he worked as a communications specialist in the Army during the first Gulf war.
"Anywhere, he would have access anywhere to be able to transmit any live footage from that web cam," explains Torres.
Whether or not he had transmitted it, detectives don't know.
The fire department has refused to comment and, when asked by Channel 9 about Valle, denied that anyone by that name was in any trouble.
While detectives work towards an arrest for attempted voyeurism, they say it's a scary reminder, that you never know who's watching.
"Just be aware of your surroundings; you're really not safe anywhere," says Torres.
Valle has been in trouble once before. He was arrested in 2000 for domestic battery against his wife. When reached about these latest accusations, he had no comment.
Detectives say, as soon as they're done with the case, they'll forward it to the State Attorney's Office to press charges. Since they don't have any proof that the images were transmitted, they can only arrest Valle for attempted voyeurism, a second-degree misdemeanor.
http://www.wftv.com/news/3328543/detail.html
Fragadelic
New member
No piece of paper can be folded in half more than seven (7) times
I draw a hell of a vagina.
c-sharp minor
Well-known member
Puddles
New member
WHAT IS SEMEN MADE OF?
While we sometimes refer to semen as "sperm," sperm cells (spermatozoa) actually constitute only about 10% of our total ejaculate. That 10% contains from 200 million to 500 million sperm cells, though the figure can be higher for younger males due to the pubescent production of androgen hormones, such as testosterone, which also trigger the growth body hair and the lowering of the voice. (Remember: It takes only one sperm cell to fertilize an egg and make a baby.)
The remaining 90% is referred to as seminal plasma. (Plasma is defined as a fluid that carries a suspended solid, whether it's blood "fluid" carrying blood cells, or semen carrying sperm.) Composition of seminal plasma varies among individuals, and even in the same individual from time to time. It contains some 30 substances (many in minute quantities); some are produced by different parts of our male anatomy, and some are by-products of body functions. They include:
• ascorbic acid (vitamin C, for tissue maintenance)
• blood-group antigens (from immune system)
• calcium (mineral)
• chlorine (oxidizing agent)
• cholesterol (steroid alcohol present in body fluids)
• choline (base, part of the vitamin B complex)
• citric acid (occurs during cellular metabolism)
• creatine (nitrogenous substance found in muscle)
• deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
• fructose (sugar used for energy)
• glutathione (peptide amino acid)
• hyaluronidase (enzyme)
• inositol (sugar found in muscles)
• lactic acid (byproduct of muscle use)
• magnesium (mineral)
• nitrogen (gas found in all living tissue)
• phosporus (mineral)
• potassium (mineral)
• purine (compound of uric acid)
• pyrimidine (organic base)
• pyruvic acid (formed from either glucose or glycogen)
• sodium (salt)
• sorbitol (body alcohol)
• spermidine (catalytic enzyme)
• spermine (ammonia compound found in sperm)
• urea (from urine)
• uric acid (from urine)
• vitamin B12 (for proper function of nervous system and metabolism)
• zinc (mineral)
The amount of a compenent may rise or fall depending on a number of factors. For example, the amount of lactic acid may rise significantly after excercise, since it's a byproduct of muscular activity. (Lactic acid is what causes muscular soreness after exercise.) Also, food intake can significantly affect chemical makeup — and taste — of semen. By the way, it is not the spermatozoa which can contain HIV (which causes AIDS) but the seminal plasma.
Seminal plasma is partially made up
All material on this page © 1996-2004 JackinWorld.com unless otherwise noted.
While we sometimes refer to semen as "sperm," sperm cells (spermatozoa) actually constitute only about 10% of our total ejaculate. That 10% contains from 200 million to 500 million sperm cells, though the figure can be higher for younger males due to the pubescent production of androgen hormones, such as testosterone, which also trigger the growth body hair and the lowering of the voice. (Remember: It takes only one sperm cell to fertilize an egg and make a baby.)
The remaining 90% is referred to as seminal plasma. (Plasma is defined as a fluid that carries a suspended solid, whether it's blood "fluid" carrying blood cells, or semen carrying sperm.) Composition of seminal plasma varies among individuals, and even in the same individual from time to time. It contains some 30 substances (many in minute quantities); some are produced by different parts of our male anatomy, and some are by-products of body functions. They include:
• ascorbic acid (vitamin C, for tissue maintenance)
• blood-group antigens (from immune system)
• calcium (mineral)
• chlorine (oxidizing agent)
• cholesterol (steroid alcohol present in body fluids)
• choline (base, part of the vitamin B complex)
• citric acid (occurs during cellular metabolism)
• creatine (nitrogenous substance found in muscle)
• deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
• fructose (sugar used for energy)
• glutathione (peptide amino acid)
• hyaluronidase (enzyme)
• inositol (sugar found in muscles)
• lactic acid (byproduct of muscle use)
• magnesium (mineral)
• nitrogen (gas found in all living tissue)
• phosporus (mineral)
• potassium (mineral)
• purine (compound of uric acid)
• pyrimidine (organic base)
• pyruvic acid (formed from either glucose or glycogen)
• sodium (salt)
• sorbitol (body alcohol)
• spermidine (catalytic enzyme)
• spermine (ammonia compound found in sperm)
• urea (from urine)
• uric acid (from urine)
• vitamin B12 (for proper function of nervous system and metabolism)
• zinc (mineral)
The amount of a compenent may rise or fall depending on a number of factors. For example, the amount of lactic acid may rise significantly after excercise, since it's a byproduct of muscular activity. (Lactic acid is what causes muscular soreness after exercise.) Also, food intake can significantly affect chemical makeup — and taste — of semen. By the way, it is not the spermatozoa which can contain HIV (which causes AIDS) but the seminal plasma.
Seminal plasma is partially made up
All material on this page © 1996-2004 JackinWorld.com unless otherwise noted.
Buddy_Christ
New member
it'd be intresting to see you sub 12% bodyfat.
Lao Tzu
New member
German WW 2 propaganda telling people to turn in complainers to the SS
False Consideration
Front soldier X was wounded at Stalingrad and was airlifted back home. During his long months of recovery, his thoughts turned often to his dead and missing comrades and their families. He knew how relieved his family was at his return, and how great a burden the less fortunate had to bear. He used his short leave to visit the families of those who were closest to him. He was the last to see them, and it was his duty to pass on the last handshake from sons and husbands to their mothers and wives. It was a hard duty made easier by the fact that they had nearly all been men who did their duty. But it gave him occasion to reflect.
He visited a family of acquaintances. They spoke of this and that. The conversation turned to an old woman. One preferred to avoid Frau So-and-So. She was a nice enough woman, to be sure, but she said the oddest things. Recently, she said it was stupid that our soldiers had to undergo such dangers, and similar things. She caused a lot of bother and annoyance, and probably is not quite right in the head. One really cannot take her seriously.
One didn't report her to the police, our reader asked? No, one could not do that. One could hardly send her to prison or even the gallows. She was such a nice woman!
And these were fine loyal Germans, old and honest National Socialists...
The story got our front soldier thinking. He did not overestimate the matter; he knew that the hysterical old thing talked such nonsense and slandered German soldiers to get attention, and that she belongs to that irreducible one percent of fools and criminals that every nation has, even Germany. He had been near to death too often not to understand life. He was not surprised that there are such people. Rather, he was surprised that there are people who underestimate the dangers of such behavior, and that some are considerate toward such people from misplaced bourgeois sentimentality.
No reasonable person is surprised that some old biddy talks in a way that will sooner or later attract the attention of the states attorney. He is surprised that good citizens, loyal old National Socialists, hear such things and are angered by them because they know the possible effects, but do nothing about it because "She is such a nice old lady." Actually, they are cowards who lack a sense of civic responsibility. The resulting investigation might be uncomfortable for them.
This is the core of the problem that we have to speak openly about, German to German, National Socialist to National Socialist.
Our enemy is giving us a clear enough picture of what he would do to us so that only a small percentage of criminals and racial trash in Germany opposes our victory. Their number is so small as to pose no danger to us. However, they could have an impact not only at home, but far worse on the soldiers at the front.
The front soldier who meets such people at home, even if they are rare, can easily forget all that he experiences at the front: the silent dedication with which millions do their duty, their quiet work for victory. It therefore goes without saying that we must treat these few outsiders with the same determination and harshness that we show toward the enemy, regardless of how stupid and innocuous we find them. This is a war of our very survival. He who does not want victory wants our defeat. He who wants our defeat wants our death.
Do we want to leave it all to the state? Who is the state? Is the traffic policemen at the corner the state, but not we who work for victory in the factories and offices? Is there any difference between people and state? Is not the soldier first of all the state? And are not we, his brothers and fathers and comrades also responsible for the state he is defending? And are we not responsible to the Führer for the cleanliness of the state, for the people's community?
The state and people have long since become one. Each of us fulfills state functions. First of all, the conscience that calls us to duty is the state within us. But we also have a duty to others, for we have no more claim on victory than the efforts we put in to win it, whatever the conditions. We can no more take a vacation from our duties or a holiday from the state than can the soldier at the front. We cannot flee our responsibility for victory by retreating into our private lives, nor can he.
One occasionally hears a good person reporting that he he encountered this or that, or that someone said something or another, or he overheard this or that in a shop or in a factory. He speaks with bitterness: "How is that possible? Why is it allowed? Where is the state?"
Well, my friend, what did you do? Where was the state in you?
Well, you say, it was a stranger talking to a stranger, it was none of my business. Or maybe you did not want to cause a fuss. Or someone else should have done something. Or maybe it was even a colleague. One must maintain good relations with colleagues. Or maybe it was an old acquaintance, with whom one does not want any trouble.
You are being considerate, my friend. You will surely be thanked. Whether he knows it or not, each stupid chatterer or malicious rumor spreader is helping the enemy to destroy the German people. The enemy imagines he can defeat us by a campaign of agitation. If he reaches his goals, the German people will be destroyed, exterminated, enslaved. Do you think your consideration will earn you special treatment? Do you think a warm place will be reserved for you out there in a Siberian concentration camp?
Oh, but you say you did not hold back from cowardice? You are the well-bred man or woman who does not associate with such people. It would be beneath your dignity to deal with every scoundrel, dolt or know-it-all? It is not beneath the dignity of your son, fighting the Bolshevists on the Eastern Front! It is not beneath the dignity of your sister in the West, fighting phosphorus bombs with pails of water and fire extinguishers. And you do not think it would be beneath the dignity of a policeman, detective, psychiatrist or states attorney to deal with such elements? It is only beneath your dignity...
There was a time when we had a different understanding of dignity. There was a time when one did not simply call oneself German; he had to prove it every day, a time when one called oneself a National Socialist and really was. Some do not speak very often of those days any longer, days we called the period of struggle [Kampfzeit ], since they mistakenly believe that there is nothing more to fight for.
Wearing the party badge then made demands on a person. If that were not even more true today, party membership would mean nothing. After all, one can prove one belongs to an organization simply by showing the receipt for one's membership dues. Back then, everyone knew what would happen if he said something stupid. Were it any different today, if one could say something stupid or dangerous in the presence such a badge-wearing National Socialist without any danger, that National Socialist had better consider why he wears the badge, why he joined a fighting community, if he is not ready to fulfill the most basic obligation of a decent German.
This is not to say that one should make a federal case out of every expression of dissatisfaction by a decent German, whether or not is is a party member. Heaven save us from the 150%er! If a tired worker complains because the streetcar comes too infrequently, when someone gets three cigarettes a day too few, when a housewife does not get the fish or some other thing she thinks she needs, or when someone who has been bombed out lets loose with his feelings, remember that complaining is the bowel movement of the soul. Even when someone complains about problems that exist only in his imagination or attacks people who really have nothing to do with his difficulties, no reasonable person will get upset. We all complain. When someone complains about his barber or something else, it does not necessary mean that he does not want victory. He may still be doing all in his power to bring it about. He can think that this or that should be done differently and still be a faithful follower of the Führer. A chain smoker can still wear the Knight's Cross. But no one can do the enemy's work by spreading pessimism, defeatism and rumors without being seen for what he is: an enemy of the people and the state who must be dealt with directly by word or deed.
Listen to the voice of the front, to the voice of the soldier whose letter occasioned this article:
"Any such compassion is absurd. Today, one cannot excuse standing aside with ignorance or error. The laughably small number of enemies who remain at home suffer from irremediable lack of character, regardless of whether they do it by choice or not. They can no longer be persuaded, only rendered harmless by direct and unforgiving action.
We owe that to our comrades at the front, and to all those generations who lived and died for Germany's greatness. We owe it as well to the millions of our people who are ready to go through he heights and the depths under a leadership that knows how to bring out their best. These people do their duty bravely and loyally, and are after all the ground from which the genuine greatness of the nation grows.
He who sins today against the life of our people must be destroyed. We demand that babblers at home be treated the same as the enemies abroad. They have earned that treatment by their deeds."
So may every person at home think. Behind him stands the invisible man in a gray uniform. He who does not do the duty the front expects of him betrays it. He perhaps betrays his own son, he betrays the honored dead who also died for him.
It is a period of struggle. It is hellishly dangerous if we do not expect all of the German people to be in the same boat, no matter how stupid they may be.
False Consideration
Front soldier X was wounded at Stalingrad and was airlifted back home. During his long months of recovery, his thoughts turned often to his dead and missing comrades and their families. He knew how relieved his family was at his return, and how great a burden the less fortunate had to bear. He used his short leave to visit the families of those who were closest to him. He was the last to see them, and it was his duty to pass on the last handshake from sons and husbands to their mothers and wives. It was a hard duty made easier by the fact that they had nearly all been men who did their duty. But it gave him occasion to reflect.
He visited a family of acquaintances. They spoke of this and that. The conversation turned to an old woman. One preferred to avoid Frau So-and-So. She was a nice enough woman, to be sure, but she said the oddest things. Recently, she said it was stupid that our soldiers had to undergo such dangers, and similar things. She caused a lot of bother and annoyance, and probably is not quite right in the head. One really cannot take her seriously.
One didn't report her to the police, our reader asked? No, one could not do that. One could hardly send her to prison or even the gallows. She was such a nice woman!
And these were fine loyal Germans, old and honest National Socialists...
The story got our front soldier thinking. He did not overestimate the matter; he knew that the hysterical old thing talked such nonsense and slandered German soldiers to get attention, and that she belongs to that irreducible one percent of fools and criminals that every nation has, even Germany. He had been near to death too often not to understand life. He was not surprised that there are such people. Rather, he was surprised that there are people who underestimate the dangers of such behavior, and that some are considerate toward such people from misplaced bourgeois sentimentality.
No reasonable person is surprised that some old biddy talks in a way that will sooner or later attract the attention of the states attorney. He is surprised that good citizens, loyal old National Socialists, hear such things and are angered by them because they know the possible effects, but do nothing about it because "She is such a nice old lady." Actually, they are cowards who lack a sense of civic responsibility. The resulting investigation might be uncomfortable for them.
This is the core of the problem that we have to speak openly about, German to German, National Socialist to National Socialist.
Our enemy is giving us a clear enough picture of what he would do to us so that only a small percentage of criminals and racial trash in Germany opposes our victory. Their number is so small as to pose no danger to us. However, they could have an impact not only at home, but far worse on the soldiers at the front.
The front soldier who meets such people at home, even if they are rare, can easily forget all that he experiences at the front: the silent dedication with which millions do their duty, their quiet work for victory. It therefore goes without saying that we must treat these few outsiders with the same determination and harshness that we show toward the enemy, regardless of how stupid and innocuous we find them. This is a war of our very survival. He who does not want victory wants our defeat. He who wants our defeat wants our death.
Do we want to leave it all to the state? Who is the state? Is the traffic policemen at the corner the state, but not we who work for victory in the factories and offices? Is there any difference between people and state? Is not the soldier first of all the state? And are not we, his brothers and fathers and comrades also responsible for the state he is defending? And are we not responsible to the Führer for the cleanliness of the state, for the people's community?
The state and people have long since become one. Each of us fulfills state functions. First of all, the conscience that calls us to duty is the state within us. But we also have a duty to others, for we have no more claim on victory than the efforts we put in to win it, whatever the conditions. We can no more take a vacation from our duties or a holiday from the state than can the soldier at the front. We cannot flee our responsibility for victory by retreating into our private lives, nor can he.
One occasionally hears a good person reporting that he he encountered this or that, or that someone said something or another, or he overheard this or that in a shop or in a factory. He speaks with bitterness: "How is that possible? Why is it allowed? Where is the state?"
Well, my friend, what did you do? Where was the state in you?
Well, you say, it was a stranger talking to a stranger, it was none of my business. Or maybe you did not want to cause a fuss. Or someone else should have done something. Or maybe it was even a colleague. One must maintain good relations with colleagues. Or maybe it was an old acquaintance, with whom one does not want any trouble.
You are being considerate, my friend. You will surely be thanked. Whether he knows it or not, each stupid chatterer or malicious rumor spreader is helping the enemy to destroy the German people. The enemy imagines he can defeat us by a campaign of agitation. If he reaches his goals, the German people will be destroyed, exterminated, enslaved. Do you think your consideration will earn you special treatment? Do you think a warm place will be reserved for you out there in a Siberian concentration camp?
Oh, but you say you did not hold back from cowardice? You are the well-bred man or woman who does not associate with such people. It would be beneath your dignity to deal with every scoundrel, dolt or know-it-all? It is not beneath the dignity of your son, fighting the Bolshevists on the Eastern Front! It is not beneath the dignity of your sister in the West, fighting phosphorus bombs with pails of water and fire extinguishers. And you do not think it would be beneath the dignity of a policeman, detective, psychiatrist or states attorney to deal with such elements? It is only beneath your dignity...
There was a time when we had a different understanding of dignity. There was a time when one did not simply call oneself German; he had to prove it every day, a time when one called oneself a National Socialist and really was. Some do not speak very often of those days any longer, days we called the period of struggle [Kampfzeit ], since they mistakenly believe that there is nothing more to fight for.
Wearing the party badge then made demands on a person. If that were not even more true today, party membership would mean nothing. After all, one can prove one belongs to an organization simply by showing the receipt for one's membership dues. Back then, everyone knew what would happen if he said something stupid. Were it any different today, if one could say something stupid or dangerous in the presence such a badge-wearing National Socialist without any danger, that National Socialist had better consider why he wears the badge, why he joined a fighting community, if he is not ready to fulfill the most basic obligation of a decent German.
This is not to say that one should make a federal case out of every expression of dissatisfaction by a decent German, whether or not is is a party member. Heaven save us from the 150%er! If a tired worker complains because the streetcar comes too infrequently, when someone gets three cigarettes a day too few, when a housewife does not get the fish or some other thing she thinks she needs, or when someone who has been bombed out lets loose with his feelings, remember that complaining is the bowel movement of the soul. Even when someone complains about problems that exist only in his imagination or attacks people who really have nothing to do with his difficulties, no reasonable person will get upset. We all complain. When someone complains about his barber or something else, it does not necessary mean that he does not want victory. He may still be doing all in his power to bring it about. He can think that this or that should be done differently and still be a faithful follower of the Führer. A chain smoker can still wear the Knight's Cross. But no one can do the enemy's work by spreading pessimism, defeatism and rumors without being seen for what he is: an enemy of the people and the state who must be dealt with directly by word or deed.
Listen to the voice of the front, to the voice of the soldier whose letter occasioned this article:
"Any such compassion is absurd. Today, one cannot excuse standing aside with ignorance or error. The laughably small number of enemies who remain at home suffer from irremediable lack of character, regardless of whether they do it by choice or not. They can no longer be persuaded, only rendered harmless by direct and unforgiving action.
We owe that to our comrades at the front, and to all those generations who lived and died for Germany's greatness. We owe it as well to the millions of our people who are ready to go through he heights and the depths under a leadership that knows how to bring out their best. These people do their duty bravely and loyally, and are after all the ground from which the genuine greatness of the nation grows.
He who sins today against the life of our people must be destroyed. We demand that babblers at home be treated the same as the enemies abroad. They have earned that treatment by their deeds."
So may every person at home think. Behind him stands the invisible man in a gray uniform. He who does not do the duty the front expects of him betrays it. He perhaps betrays his own son, he betrays the honored dead who also died for him.
It is a period of struggle. It is hellishly dangerous if we do not expect all of the German people to be in the same boat, no matter how stupid they may be.
G
Gambino
Guest
Mr. dB said:
The "Humungus Fungus" us locals like to call it...
Lao Tzu
New member
The Nazi take on the outbreak of World War II.
Why and For What?
by Dr. F.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A catastrophe has broken over Europe like a sudden hurricane. Even those not directly involved in the struggle are shocked by its elemental rage. We Germans were not as surprised, since we had long understood the enemy's policies and had assumed the day might come when he would carry out his plans and intentions.
Why are we fighting?
Because we were forced into it by England and its Polish friends. If the enemy had not begun the fight now, they would have within two or three years. England and France began the war in 1939 because they feared that in two or three years Germany would be militarily stronger and harder to defeat. The deepest roots of this war are in England's old claim to rule the world, and Europe in particular. Although its homeland is relatively small, England has understood how to cleverly exploit others to expand its possessions. It controls the seas, the important points along major sea routes, and the richest parts of our planet. The contrast between England itself and its overseas territories is so grotesque that England has always has a certain inferiority complex with respect to the European continent. Whenever a continental power reached a certain strength, England believed itself and its empire to be threatened. Every continental flowering made England nervous, every attempt at growth by nations wanting their place in the sun led England to take on the policeman's role.
One must understand this to make sense of England's German policy from Bismarck to our own day. England was not happy with the results of the war of 1870-1871. British sympathies were already on France's side, since for the previous one hundred years it had never had the same fear of France as it had of Germany. France had secured its own colonial empire, and its shrinking biological strength left enough room for expansion within its own natural boundaries. Things were different in Germany. England knew that the German people were strong when they had good leadership, and that nature had given them limited, resource-poor territory with a limited coast. Great Britain kept an eye on Germany, all the more whenever Germany expressed its strength, even in the most natural ways. The Second Reich experienced England's "balance of power" policy. We know that England did not want a true balance of power. It wants a situation in which England is always in a position with the help of its allies to have its way with a minority of confident, forward-moving nations. England's claims, rooted in the enormous disparity between its home territory and its overseas possessions, had to lead the English to react in bold and impudent ways in the face of a German people who under Adolf Hitler were developing their strength in an unprecedented way.
In the face of the development of National Socialist Germany, England turned for a second time to a policy of encirclement, the results of which are today casting their blood-red shadow across the world. We remember its development clearly. Attempts by England and its vassals to build a ring around Germany did not have the desired results. The Western democracies made dramatic efforts to win Soviet Russia. Instead, Adolf Hitler's hated Germany made a pact, which is founded on centuries of experience between Prussian-Germany and Russia.
The Poles were the only remaining Slavic vassal in Eastern Europe. Rather than dampening the native Polish hatred of ethnic Germans and of German-Polish peace, and Poland's desire to play the role of the big man, England did all in its power to feed the fire that was burning between Kattowitz and Danzig. Their goal was to use the situation, with the remnants of encirclement, to incite a war with Germany.
The English wanted this war in the crazy hope that it was their last chance to stop Germany's growing strength. They passionately avoided doing anything that might have prevented war. Rather than encouraging Poland to accept the Führer's generous proposals to resolve the situation, they encouraged it to let the deadline pass, thereby providing a reason for war. The Führer felt obliged to strike back only after Polish troops had crossed the German border at several places. The German fight is a defensive fight. We fight because we were forced to fight by the insults and demands against us, because of the brutal suppression of ethnic Germans in Poland, and because of the open announcements that they would do everything in their power to strangle National Socialist Germany through military or economic means.
This explanation of the German defensive struggle answers the next question:
What are we fighting for?
We are fighting for our most valuable possession: our freedom. We are fighting for our land and our skies. We are fighting so that our children will not be slaves of foreign rulers. That is in no way an exaggeration or empty phrase.
We know the English. We know about Versailles, about the colonies England stole from us, about the Ruhr, about Golzheimer Heath, about the starvation blockade. We know that we will be slaves if we do not win and we know that the goal of England's policy of encirclement is to subject Germany to its will. We know what that means. We all remember the days when Allied inspectors wandered around Germany.
We are fighting for Germany's freedom and for Germany's right to be a people that has all it needs to preserve its national existence. The Führer made unprecedented offers for peace and understanding to those who are now fighting against Germany. His attempts were scornfully rejected because they wanted this fight.
We are fighting for a lasting peace that will make a repetition of Versailles impossible. For two long decades, it caused an enormous, constantly bleeding wound among the ethnic Germans in the East. We are fighting to save our children from the unbearable threats of the Western democracies, driven by envy and hatred. We are fighting for a happy future in a free Germany and in a peaceful Europe.
Why and For What?
by Dr. F.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A catastrophe has broken over Europe like a sudden hurricane. Even those not directly involved in the struggle are shocked by its elemental rage. We Germans were not as surprised, since we had long understood the enemy's policies and had assumed the day might come when he would carry out his plans and intentions.
Why are we fighting?
Because we were forced into it by England and its Polish friends. If the enemy had not begun the fight now, they would have within two or three years. England and France began the war in 1939 because they feared that in two or three years Germany would be militarily stronger and harder to defeat. The deepest roots of this war are in England's old claim to rule the world, and Europe in particular. Although its homeland is relatively small, England has understood how to cleverly exploit others to expand its possessions. It controls the seas, the important points along major sea routes, and the richest parts of our planet. The contrast between England itself and its overseas territories is so grotesque that England has always has a certain inferiority complex with respect to the European continent. Whenever a continental power reached a certain strength, England believed itself and its empire to be threatened. Every continental flowering made England nervous, every attempt at growth by nations wanting their place in the sun led England to take on the policeman's role.
One must understand this to make sense of England's German policy from Bismarck to our own day. England was not happy with the results of the war of 1870-1871. British sympathies were already on France's side, since for the previous one hundred years it had never had the same fear of France as it had of Germany. France had secured its own colonial empire, and its shrinking biological strength left enough room for expansion within its own natural boundaries. Things were different in Germany. England knew that the German people were strong when they had good leadership, and that nature had given them limited, resource-poor territory with a limited coast. Great Britain kept an eye on Germany, all the more whenever Germany expressed its strength, even in the most natural ways. The Second Reich experienced England's "balance of power" policy. We know that England did not want a true balance of power. It wants a situation in which England is always in a position with the help of its allies to have its way with a minority of confident, forward-moving nations. England's claims, rooted in the enormous disparity between its home territory and its overseas possessions, had to lead the English to react in bold and impudent ways in the face of a German people who under Adolf Hitler were developing their strength in an unprecedented way.
In the face of the development of National Socialist Germany, England turned for a second time to a policy of encirclement, the results of which are today casting their blood-red shadow across the world. We remember its development clearly. Attempts by England and its vassals to build a ring around Germany did not have the desired results. The Western democracies made dramatic efforts to win Soviet Russia. Instead, Adolf Hitler's hated Germany made a pact, which is founded on centuries of experience between Prussian-Germany and Russia.
The Poles were the only remaining Slavic vassal in Eastern Europe. Rather than dampening the native Polish hatred of ethnic Germans and of German-Polish peace, and Poland's desire to play the role of the big man, England did all in its power to feed the fire that was burning between Kattowitz and Danzig. Their goal was to use the situation, with the remnants of encirclement, to incite a war with Germany.
The English wanted this war in the crazy hope that it was their last chance to stop Germany's growing strength. They passionately avoided doing anything that might have prevented war. Rather than encouraging Poland to accept the Führer's generous proposals to resolve the situation, they encouraged it to let the deadline pass, thereby providing a reason for war. The Führer felt obliged to strike back only after Polish troops had crossed the German border at several places. The German fight is a defensive fight. We fight because we were forced to fight by the insults and demands against us, because of the brutal suppression of ethnic Germans in Poland, and because of the open announcements that they would do everything in their power to strangle National Socialist Germany through military or economic means.
This explanation of the German defensive struggle answers the next question:
What are we fighting for?
We are fighting for our most valuable possession: our freedom. We are fighting for our land and our skies. We are fighting so that our children will not be slaves of foreign rulers. That is in no way an exaggeration or empty phrase.
We know the English. We know about Versailles, about the colonies England stole from us, about the Ruhr, about Golzheimer Heath, about the starvation blockade. We know that we will be slaves if we do not win and we know that the goal of England's policy of encirclement is to subject Germany to its will. We know what that means. We all remember the days when Allied inspectors wandered around Germany.
We are fighting for Germany's freedom and for Germany's right to be a people that has all it needs to preserve its national existence. The Führer made unprecedented offers for peace and understanding to those who are now fighting against Germany. His attempts were scornfully rejected because they wanted this fight.
We are fighting for a lasting peace that will make a repetition of Versailles impossible. For two long decades, it caused an enormous, constantly bleeding wound among the ethnic Germans in the East. We are fighting to save our children from the unbearable threats of the Western democracies, driven by envy and hatred. We are fighting for a happy future in a free Germany and in a peaceful Europe.
J
jenscats5
Guest
2+2 = 4
juicedpigtails middle name is makethewomanorgasm
i am felix, hear me roar
starfish said:Now you're talking
He is all hyper and running around my living room with his ball
minkey is asleep in front of her food bowl
U
Ulcasterdropout
Guest
There are more Irish in New York City than in Dublin, Ireland; more Italians in New York City than in Rome, Italy; and more Jews in New York City than in Tel Aviv, Israel.
Similar threads
