Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Post Anavar Question
- Thread starter theprophe
- Start date
Willyumyum
New member
you don't need arimidex post a cycle of just anavar, it doesn't aromitize and you shouldn't even really need it DURING the cycle unless you are trying to keep estrogen levels low from use of other gear... But you shouldn't be holding much or any water from anavar alone, if any at all...
YUM
YUM
alwysgetnbigga
New member
good post lone az
More information.
Over production of sebum is the cause on acne
Sebum production can be altered by systemic medications, but noticeable improvement does not occur until two to four months after therapy begins. Since sebaceous glands are androgen-dependent, estrogens and antiandrogens are useful therapies. Because of their feminizing properties, they should be used only in women. The beneficial effects of ethinyl estradiol are most apparent at doses of 50 [Mu]g or more. Newer oral contraceptives that contain 35 [Mu]g or less of ethinyl estradiol are not as effective, although lower dose oral contraceptives that include a nonandrogenic progesterone such as norgestimate or desogestrel can be effective. Spironolactone may also be effective in reducing sebum production and improving acne, even in doses as low as 25 to 50 mg daily.
Over production of sebum is the cause on acne
Sebum production can be altered by systemic medications, but noticeable improvement does not occur until two to four months after therapy begins. Since sebaceous glands are androgen-dependent, estrogens and antiandrogens are useful therapies. Because of their feminizing properties, they should be used only in women. The beneficial effects of ethinyl estradiol are most apparent at doses of 50 [Mu]g or more. Newer oral contraceptives that contain 35 [Mu]g or less of ethinyl estradiol are not as effective, although lower dose oral contraceptives that include a nonandrogenic progesterone such as norgestimate or desogestrel can be effective. Spironolactone may also be effective in reducing sebum production and improving acne, even in doses as low as 25 to 50 mg daily.
here are a couple quotes from huck
"If you start to notice a dip in libido,I would then do the 100mg/day for 1 week,50mg/day for 2nd week regimen of clomid.If you're worried about acne,then run arimidex at 1mg/day along side of the clomid,as it will repress estrogen influence of oil/fluid productivity in the sebacious tissue."
"The two together work much better as post-cycle therapy.Remember,clomid does not interfere with PRODUCTION of estrogen,it only blocks it from binding with particular sites.The liquidex will slow down or cease PRODUCTION.So the two combined are a very effective team indeed post cycle"
"If you start to notice a dip in libido,I would then do the 100mg/day for 1 week,50mg/day for 2nd week regimen of clomid.If you're worried about acne,then run arimidex at 1mg/day along side of the clomid,as it will repress estrogen influence of oil/fluid productivity in the sebacious tissue."
"The two together work much better as post-cycle therapy.Remember,clomid does not interfere with PRODUCTION of estrogen,it only blocks it from binding with particular sites.The liquidex will slow down or cease PRODUCTION.So the two combined are a very effective team indeed post cycle"
But if you read my last post you will see that sebaceous glands are androgen-dependent, estrogens and antiandrogens are useful therapies for acne so the use of Arimidex should not have any effect on acne.
There is clear logic to Clomid induced acne. Clomid by binding to the receptor sites of the sebaceous gland will in effect block the positive effects of estrogen on the sebaceous glands which in turn causes a greater production of oil. So even with Huck’s statement I still do not see any connection. Does Huck or anyone else have any evidence to support that Arimidex does in fact help Clomid induced acne? I thoroughly respect Huck’s opinion and advice but I’m never one to just accept an explanation just because Huck or anyone else says so. Real proof would ideal. It would be a waste to take Arimidex for something that it actually does not help with given that it can be expensive.
There is clear logic to Clomid induced acne. Clomid by binding to the receptor sites of the sebaceous gland will in effect block the positive effects of estrogen on the sebaceous glands which in turn causes a greater production of oil. So even with Huck’s statement I still do not see any connection. Does Huck or anyone else have any evidence to support that Arimidex does in fact help Clomid induced acne? I thoroughly respect Huck’s opinion and advice but I’m never one to just accept an explanation just because Huck or anyone else says so. Real proof would ideal. It would be a waste to take Arimidex for something that it actually does not help with given that it can be expensive.
