Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Please ban JerseyArt
- Thread starter bluepeter
- Start date
- Status
T
The Shadow
Guest
bluepeter said:
MOD material^^^^^
bluepeter said:
Before I get banned, can you answer how many tickets to democratic rallies republicans are entitled to in order to make sure those damn dems dont get away with vilating my "inalienable right" to attend democratic events?
Im assuming it has to be at least 50%, or else wouldnt that be discrimination?
Ot are only a handful of token republicans necessary to satisfy the requirements of the Constitution?
Hee hee
bluepeter
New member
jerseyart said:Before I get banned, can you answer how many tickets to democratic rallies republicans are entitled to in order to make sure those damn dems dont get away with vilating my "inalienable right" to attend democratic events?
Im assuming it has to be at least 50%, or else wouldnt that be discrimination?
Ot are only a handful of token republicans necessary to satisfy the requirements of the Constitution?
Hee hee
Never mentioned the constitution.
S
Spartacus
Guest
why liberal women aren't desirablejerseyart said:Before I get banned, can you answer how many tickets to democratic rallies republicans are entitled to in order to make sure those damn dems dont get away with vilating my "inalienable right" to attend democratic events?
Im assuming it has to be at least 50%, or else wouldnt that be discrimination?
Ot are only a handful of token republicans necessary to satisfy the requirements of the Constitution?
Hee hee
http://img194.exs.cx/img194/1268/czechtekkgirl9up.jpg
bluepeter said:
LOL
Its about time
Dude I admit error whenever its justified. And unlike most, I dont argue personality and actuallyt address the points made to me by those with opposing views. I just dont disregard them completely
You all get so pissy cause I throw in an occasional insult to someones intelligence. Go read that thread again, and tell me where I once complained about anyone doing the same (and worse) to me , or where you criticized such behavior when it was done by someone whose viewpoint you agreed with bor.
LOL
I even had Chef post I wasnt morally qualified to make judgements on the nature of life (even though anythign I wroter could have been argued on its own merit independnet of my alleged lack of moral character) cause I wasn't as good a person as himself. Where was your angst then?
The this same baffoon lacks the sense of self awareness necessary to cause him to blush while he goes around posting what I imagine are intended to be clever parodies of what he imagines the right to be like, me in particular.
It's like you have to fail some test to be liberal
Please guys, its not rocket science
T
The Shadow
Guest
"had Chef post that"
..interesting wording
..interesting wording
T
The Shadow
Guest
you want me to lock this for you?
Wrong again, you typical liberal atheist commie cognitively disconnected fool. But feel free to post your imaginary community work resume for everyone who cares.... AGAIN... as if it has any bearing on the fact.
Oh.. and please dont ban JA. Then Curling would back to being EFs most annoying member.
M
*MissFit*
Guest
r u running outta holes to fill 
T
The Shadow
Guest
jerseyart said:
DUDE.....you are getting verbally raped.....I was asking to do you a favor......
ChefWide said:
Actually it was sadly true.
But it was funny to read you post that until I matched your lifelong commitment (OMG LMAO) I was too hypocritical too comment
Well said Mother Theresa.
Im still waiting by the way fro you to show us where all these poor kids with TB are dying neglected and without treatment in the USA.
Or was your personal crusade so effedctive that you managed to wipe out that dread scourge from our shores
If so well done
T
The Shadow
Guest
bran987 said:
Hey.......mods get bitched when we DONT lock threads......
jerseyart said:
That was the second time i know of for sure, but surely there are more, you puntuate your claptrap with a list of your supposed contributions to your comunity. I didnt believe you then, i dont believe you now. You 'matched' nothing other than my ability to spell poorly and talk too much.
I said it very clearly the last time, but typical of an intellectually lazy, cognitively disconnected, thick in the brain, vaccuous, whining, hypocrite, you forgot to notice that I have neither the need or nor desire to post up a list of my work for your approval or perusal. How typically self centered and self aggrandising of you to think that your oppion means shit to me. You imagine that you listing some 'works' on this board makes it so? The same of course would go in the other direction, and as you already openly questioned my integrity, it would be unfair of me not to openly question yours, dontchya think, hon? bor?
I love ya babe, but neither your opinion nor your parrotlike self serving yappity yap have any real appeal beyond the morbid enjoyment that most folks have at slowing down near a horrible accident, or watching some borderline disconnected lunatic rave in the street. But you must experience that quite a bit in that inbred white trash state you live in, you conservative dipstick.
ChefWide said:
Second time. Im adverse generally to mention it, but its especially amusing to do so with self righteous do nothing liberals whose great contribution to society consists of an unending whine that someone other than themsleves should really do something about (insert perceived atrocity).
In fairness I never really bought any of your multi million dollar reastaurant fantasy representations either (Im sure there are tons of "investors" just dying to part with their money to someone whose only foray into the business was a failure), but I had the class to wish you well anyway.
Another clueless statement from a man with a long history of same.
I didnt introduce "past altruism" as a criteria for participating in the discussion Einstein, you did
It takes a special kind of stupid to fail to even grasp your own statements or representations. You could be presdient of that club
What you actually said was when I had made trhe same kind of lifelong commitment to those issues that you had, then I could talk to you about the sacred nature of life.
And now you are too above it all
You really are turning out to be a self righteous and cluless twit.
Its like talking to a child
Heres a clue for you bor. If you cant argue an issue on its merits, then stay out of the discussion.
But if you are going to make pretentious claims of being better qulaified to speak because of some manufactured claim to haviong lived a more generous life, then dont cry when your called out on it maing.
Stick to stories of restaurant riches which dont involve me, and Ill allow you your patheitci pretenses without interruption
I
jerseyart said:Second time. Im adverse generally to mention it, but its especially amusing to do so with self righteous do nothing liberals whose great contribution to society consists of an unending whine that someone other than themsleves should really do something about (insert perceived atrocity).
In fairness I never really bought any of your multi million dollar reastaurant fantasy representations either (Im sure there are tons of "investors" just dying to part with their money to someone whose only foray into the business was a failure), but I had the class to wish you well anyway.
Another clueless statement from a man with a long history of same.
I didnt introduce "past altruism" as a criteria for participating in the discussion Einstein, you did
It takes a special kind of stupid to fail to even grasp your own statements or representations. You could be presdient of that club
What you actually said was when I had made trhe same kind of lifelong commitment to those issues that you had, then I could talk to you about the sacred nature of life.
And now you are too above it all
You really are turning out to be a self righteous and cluless twit.
Its like talking to a child
Heres a clue for you bor. If you cant argue an issue on its merits, then stay out of the discussion.
But if you are going to make pretentious claims of being better qulaified to speak because of some manufactured claim to haviong lived a more generous life, then dont cry when your called out on it maing.
Stick to stories of restaurant riches which dont involve me, and Ill allow you your patheitci pretenses without interruption
I
FYI - It's :
restaurant
president
the
qualified
having
you're
pathetic
interuption
P.S. Have you used "obfuscation" yet?
jnevin
New member
jerseyart said:Second time. Im adverse generally to mention it, but its especially amusing to do so with self righteous do nothing liberals whose great contribution to society consists of an unending whine that someone other than themsleves should really do something about (insert perceived atrocity).
In fairness I never really bought any of your multi million dollar reastaurant fantasy representations either (Im sure there are tons of "investors" just dying to part with their money to someone whose only foray into the business was a failure), but I had the class to wish you well anyway.
Another clueless statement from a man with a long history of same.
I didnt introduce "past altruism" as a criteria for participating in the discussion Einstein, you did
It takes a special kind of stupid to fail to even grasp your own statements or representations. You could be presdient of that club
What you actually said was when I had made trhe same kind of lifelong commitment to those issues that you had, then I could talk to you about the sacred nature of life.
And now you are too above it all
You really are turning out to be a self righteous and cluless twit.
Its like talking to a child
Heres a clue for you bor. If you cant argue an issue on its merits, then stay out of the discussion.
But if you are going to make pretentious claims of being better qulaified to speak because of some manufactured claim to haviong lived a more generous life, then dont cry when your called out on it maing.
Stick to stories of restaurant riches which dont involve me, and Ill allow you your patheitci pretenses without interruption
I
You argue like a little unhappy spoiled child.
jerseyart said:
I'm helping him
jerseyart said:
All the rest of this asside for a moment.. what are you talking about? My only foray into business!??! LOL... you DONT EVEN KNOW ME! YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ME, where i have worked, who i have worked for, what i have done either professionally or for my comunity and yet you still seem to find such glee in MAKING SHIT UP!
You have no idea about ANY OF THESE things?! Again, you think that by saying this kind of typicallly Jersy Art drama instigating horseshit that I am going to do what? List the names of the companies i have worked for? Or the names of the restaurants I have helped open? or the catering companies I have been executive chef at? Fool. What possible gain do you get by saying shit like this?! You think for one moment i would let a nutjob like you know the full details of my professional life? Yes, we talked about this new phase in my carreer being a totally new one, yes i am nervous about it, yes i am risking it all: NEWS FLASH the whole board knows this, who cares!? the fact that its working better than expected is wonderful for me, but why do you find it so compelling to try and sound like you know when you dont?
You're such an expert on my professional past, anyone with a cursory knowledge of my business and such an intimate knowledge of my past as you claim to have would be able to name the three restaurants/caterers that i was executive chef at in Manhattan, right? well, Art? what were there names? Well? Go ahead. Oops, I forgot YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
This beyond low, even for you. The fact is you dont know a fucking thing about me, you malicious child.
- Status
