S
SSAlexSS
Guest
http://www.taner.net/wtc/media/First_Plane_Crash_SLOW_.mpeg
At the end of the clip you have a shot of a pentagon crash.
The wingspan of a 757 is about 125 feet, with about 35 feet between the two jet engines.
I dont see a 125 foot hole, or anything near it. Look at the size of the mirror, thats about 1 feet.
Now lets see how much windows (what we use to measure the length of the crash site) we can stack up.
The hole is at most 30-50 feet! Also notice the fact that there are NO wing marks.
---------------
See the following URLs at the website of the U.S. Army Military District of Washington, D.C., sent to me by researcher John DiNardo, <[email protected]>. By the way, Mr. DiNardo suspects that inside explosives were used at the Pentagon on 9-11. Certainly the damaged section of the building had just been renovated; explosives would have been easy to install.
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/firetruck.html
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon6
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/capitolview.html
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon5
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/cars-damaged.html
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon2
The scenes depicted by the US Army photos are consistent with contemporaneously published photos in the popular press. See, for example, US News and World Report, September 14, 2001, pg. 40.
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/usn010914-1.jpg
and the photo that appeared in Newsweek's 2001 "Extra" edition, pgs. 26, 27.
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/nwkxtr-1.jpg
This photograph below, with caption, appeared on the US Army Military District of Washington site. It unwittingly demonstrates that there was no Boeing 757 wreckage. Think now: a hundred thousand pounds of seats, framework, skin plates, engine parts, flaps, wheels, luggage, interior panels, electronics, and this little out-of-context scrap of God-knows what was shown by the Pentagon.
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/planepiece.html
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon0
In the last several months, largely as a result of Mr. DiNardo's work, there has been growing Internet discussion of the lack of Boeing 757 debris outside the Pentagon. Now, magically, new photos of "Boeing 757" Pentagon wreckage are beginning to appear. Check out the websites of Mike Rivero <whatreallyhappened.com> and Joe Vialls for copies of these fakes. Rivero and Vialls, by endorsing them as real, have surely identified themselves as members of the fake opposition.
-----------
last few paragraphs taken from
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/plissken.htm
and check
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html
At the end of the clip you have a shot of a pentagon crash.
The wingspan of a 757 is about 125 feet, with about 35 feet between the two jet engines.
I dont see a 125 foot hole, or anything near it. Look at the size of the mirror, thats about 1 feet.
Now lets see how much windows (what we use to measure the length of the crash site) we can stack up.
The hole is at most 30-50 feet! Also notice the fact that there are NO wing marks.
---------------
See the following URLs at the website of the U.S. Army Military District of Washington, D.C., sent to me by researcher John DiNardo, <[email protected]>. By the way, Mr. DiNardo suspects that inside explosives were used at the Pentagon on 9-11. Certainly the damaged section of the building had just been renovated; explosives would have been easy to install.
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/firetruck.html
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon6
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/capitolview.html
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon5
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/cars-damaged.html
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon2
The scenes depicted by the US Army photos are consistent with contemporaneously published photos in the popular press. See, for example, US News and World Report, September 14, 2001, pg. 40.
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/usn010914-1.jpg
and the photo that appeared in Newsweek's 2001 "Extra" edition, pgs. 26, 27.
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/nwkxtr-1.jpg
This photograph below, with caption, appeared on the US Army Military District of Washington site. It unwittingly demonstrates that there was no Boeing 757 wreckage. Think now: a hundred thousand pounds of seats, framework, skin plates, engine parts, flaps, wheels, luggage, interior panels, electronics, and this little out-of-context scrap of God-knows what was shown by the Pentagon.
http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/news_photos/911/pages/planepiece.html
http://www.Public-Action.com/911/pentagon0
In the last several months, largely as a result of Mr. DiNardo's work, there has been growing Internet discussion of the lack of Boeing 757 debris outside the Pentagon. Now, magically, new photos of "Boeing 757" Pentagon wreckage are beginning to appear. Check out the websites of Mike Rivero <whatreallyhappened.com> and Joe Vialls for copies of these fakes. Rivero and Vialls, by endorsing them as real, have surely identified themselves as members of the fake opposition.
-----------
last few paragraphs taken from
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/plissken.htm
and check
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










