milo hobgoblin
New member
http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=126649#121
Assuming they used the scientific method.. and it was repeateable (which from the article appears to be)
Opinions?
Personally .. as much as I wish I was.. Ive never believed in psychics, fortunetelling, time travel.. after all those years in college studying science Ive become so skeptical about anything that cant be seen or verified. I want to beleive our univers is more than what can be quantified by math and physics and that what we feel and wish for mattereed.. however.. I cant. I simply lack faith of any kind.
But something about the article sparked my interest.. maybe the simplicity. It would seem that to pick up human emotions... they would have to be very sensitive devices.
The other problem is that they are so general.. they point to a major world event of "some kind" both good and bad.. there appears to be know way of knowing if the "event" they predict is going tobe good or bad.. jsut something that affect a lot of people simultaneously..
Although Im sure there could be a method to detect "good and bad" human emotions.
and then of course the article could be totally bogus.. it doesnt seem to cite much actual "evidence".. of course its not a journal so that isnt a requirement.. but why wouldnt they give some basic examples??
Assuming they used the scientific method.. and it was repeateable (which from the article appears to be)
Opinions?
Personally .. as much as I wish I was.. Ive never believed in psychics, fortunetelling, time travel.. after all those years in college studying science Ive become so skeptical about anything that cant be seen or verified. I want to beleive our univers is more than what can be quantified by math and physics and that what we feel and wish for mattereed.. however.. I cant. I simply lack faith of any kind.
But something about the article sparked my interest.. maybe the simplicity. It would seem that to pick up human emotions... they would have to be very sensitive devices.
The other problem is that they are so general.. they point to a major world event of "some kind" both good and bad.. there appears to be know way of knowing if the "event" they predict is going tobe good or bad.. jsut something that affect a lot of people simultaneously..
Although Im sure there could be a method to detect "good and bad" human emotions.
and then of course the article could be totally bogus.. it doesnt seem to cite much actual "evidence".. of course its not a journal so that isnt a requirement.. but why wouldnt they give some basic examples??

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










